Yuba County LAFCO Municipal Service Review Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Meeting Jan. 9, 2007 John Benoit, LAFCO Executive Officer Beverly Burr, LAFCO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 18, 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Advertisements

Municipal Service Review Public Safety Services Alameda Local Agency Formation Commission July 8, 2004 By Burr Consulting Braitman & Associates Maps by.
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED SMUD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND ANNEXATION Presented by Chris Tooker Friday, October.
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
WILLIAMSON ACT AND AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTS WILLIAMSON ACT AND AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTS Fresno County Board of Supervisors February 26, 2008.
Kings County as part of the San Joaquin Valley Blueprint County Planning & LAFCO engaging the COG’s Blueprint efforts to map out the County’s future. Greg.
CLIMATE ALLIANCE KLIMA-BÜNDNIS ALIANZA DEL CLIMA e.V. Local authorities and Climate Protection Dipl. phys. Gotelind Alber Director Climate Alliance - Klima-Bündnis.
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions LAFCo 101 A Special District Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, Executive Officer; Donald J. Lockhart, Assistant Executive Officer; Diane Thorpe, Commission.
Community GPU Forums California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter Carmel Valley Association Citizens for Responsible Growth Coalition to Protect.
1 LAFCO FEES The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
CALAFCO Annual Conference, Palm Springs Neelima Palacherla LAFCO 201 Island Annexations in Santa Clara County.
Board of Supervisors General Plan Study Session Circulation Element Traffic, Circulation, Land Use Correlation Traffic, Circulation, Land Use Correlation.
Local Planning Process The General Plan SB 18 Training Program.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
1 LAFCo and the RHNA Presented by Adam Lindgren CALAFCO September 6, 2006.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
LAFCO RESPONSIBILITIES SPHERES OF INFLUENCE & MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD ANNEXATION Presented to Yolo LAFCo September 19, 2005.
W HY C LERKS D O W HAT T HEY D O... Different Roles for Different LAFCOs  staff/county size makes a difference  clerks, secretaries, office assistants,
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions LAFCo 101 An Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions Bill Chiat, Executive Director.
Placer LAFCO Municipal Service Review North Tahoe/Martis Valley Area Northstar CSD and PCWA.
Presentation to the Placer LAFCO Commission September 10, 2014.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Incorporation and Annexation Process A Comparison November 1, 2005.
Thirtysomething: EMS in California 30 Years After SB 125 Workshop Presentation by Emergency Medical Services Administrators’ Association of California.
SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION August 30, 2007.
1 LAFCo 201 The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
LAFCo Municipal Service Review: Community Services Local Agency Formation Commission May 11, 2006 By Burr Consulting Maps by EDAW.
1 LAFCO Staff Workshop Crowne Plaza Hotel, San Jose Executive Officer Bob Braitman Legal Counsel Scott Browne.
North Dakota Water Funding 2013 Legislative Session May 13, 2013 NDACo Legislative Wrap-up Jean Schafer – North Dakota Water Coalition.
2010 CALAFCO Annual Conference Moderator: Brendon Freeman, Napa LAFCO.
Environmental Justice The Story of Matheny Tract Julie Allen, Tulare County LAFCO Public Member.
Where Do We Go From Here? 2006 Annual Conference, San Diego MSRs & Spheres Wednesday September 6, :45 pm TO 3:00 pm.
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS. Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg.
Local Agency Formation Commissions Law, Policy and Practice Plumas Local Agency Formation Commission December 14, 2015.
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
WELCOME to the FIRE DISTRICT WORKSHOP San Joaquin LAFCo July 16, 2009.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Update on Marin LAFCO Recent, Current, and Pending Projects
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
Westin Horton Plaza, San Diego
What’s Ahead Why LAFCo was created LAFCo’s role and functions
Contra Costa Watershed Forum May 11, 2016
2018 – 2020 Budget Presented by: Darryl Beaton
Special Districts on LAFCo: Why, Why Not, & How
Summary of Public Transit Evaluation
San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission
Agriculture - Open Space Preservation Policy Workshop
LAFCO AND CEQA LAFCO Role as A Responsible Agency
Subcommittee on Spheres of Influence Municipal Service Reviews
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Fresno LAFCo Special District Performance Standards Workshop
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission
Incorporation and Annexation Process A Comparison November 1, 2005
Presentation transcript:

Yuba County LAFCO Municipal Service Review Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Meeting Jan. 9, 2007 John Benoit, LAFCO Executive Officer Beverly Burr, LAFCO Consultant

What is LAFCO? LAFCO Governs: Creation of new agencies Reorganization or dissolution of agencies Agency boundaries Spheres of Influence Services provided outside boundaries Municipal service reviews LAFCO has no Direct Jurisdiction over: School districts Private water companies Air quality districts County boundary lines Redevelopment agencies Mello-Roos districts

Who are the Commissioners? Christina Billeci City of Marysville Enita Elphick City of Wheatland Mary Jane Griego Board of Supervisors Don Schrader Board of Supervisors Art Aseltine Public Member

Why Are We Here? Two state Commissions called attention to the challenges that public service providers will face over the next few decades. The legislature responded with AB 2838: New requirements include reviewing spheres of influence at least every five years; and Preparing municipal service reviews in conjunction with updating spheres of influence.

SOI Statutory Requirements Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Upon determination of a sphere of influence, the commission shall adopt that sphere, and shall review and update, as necessary, the adopted sphere not less than once every five years. - Government Code §56425 In order to prepare and update spheres of influence in accordance with Section 56425, the Commission shall conduct a service review of the municipal services provided in the county or other appropriate area designated by the commission. - Government Code §56430

What is a Sphere of Influence (SOI)? A plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency – Government Code §56076 Meaningful spheres … are regularly updated based upon comprehensive studies and they incorporate actual and projected information on trends in growth and development, service capacities, and public preferences. – Commission on Local Governance for the 21st Century A policy signal on governance or boundary changes that LAFCO would likely approve.

MSR Statutory Requirement Service Reviews Must Address 9 Determinations - Government Code § Infrastructure needs or deficiencies; 2. Growth and population projections for the affected area; 3. Financing constraints and opportunities; 4. Cost avoidance opportunities; 5. Opportunities for rate restructuring; 6. Opportunities for shared facilities; 7. Government structure options, including advantages of consolidation or reorganization of service providers; 8. Evaluation of management efficiencies; and 9. Local accountability and governance.

What was the Legislative Intent? The Commission on Local Governance for the 21 st Century recommended that LAFCO develop: Comprehensive knowledge of services available within its county, The current efficiency of providing service within various areas of the county, Future needs for each service, and Expansion capacity of each service provided.

What is the Scope of the Reviews ? Services Field services water reclamation wastewater fire among others Excludes administrative functions Excludes general County services Agencies All agencies with SOIs: cities, independent special districts County-dependent special districts School districts, redevelopment agencies, and transit are outside scope.

Yuba LAFCOs Approach Southeast City of Wheatland Plumas/Brophy FPD Beale AFB CDF* Reclamation District #817 Reclamation District #2103 Yuba County Water Agency * South Yuba Water District * Wheatland Water District Camp Far West Water District Dry Creek Mutual Water Southwest City of Marysville * CDF * Olivehurst Public Utility District Linda Fire Protection District Smartville FPD * Reclamation District #784 Yuba County Water Agency * Cal Water (Marysville) * South Yuba Water District * Linda County Water District Brophy Water District * Agency in multiple MSR subregions

Yuba LAFCOs Approach North City of Marysville * CDF * Clippermills Fire District Dobbins-Oregon House FPD Foothill FPD Smartville FPD * Camptonville CSD Hallwood CSD Loma Rica/Browns Valley CSD River Highlands CSD Reclamation District #10 Browns Valley Irrigation District Cal Water (Marysville)* Cordua Irrigation District Ramirez Water District Yuba County Water Agency* Yuba County Water District * Agency in multiple MSR subregions

Steps in the MSR Process Outreach with local agencies LAFCO requests information Agencies provide data Objective data evaluation & analysis Consultant drafts report Administrative Draft Agency Review Draft Draft Final MSR LAFCO public hearing LAFCO adopts MSR determinations LAFCO adopts SOI updates

MSR Timeline

Local Agencies Role REQUIRED Provide information Designate a liaison File written statements specifying the functions or classes of services provided OPTIONAL Review draft MSR Form working group Suggest SOI changes and governance alternatives Participate in public hearings

How will Service Reviews be Used? The reviews will assist LAFCO in carrying out its statutory responsibility of promoting orderly growth and development, while preserving open-space and agricultural land resources. Provide the basis for the Sphere of Influence (SOI) updates for all affected agencies. Service reviews will be informational tools available to the public, cities, counties, special districts, agencies and citizens groups that seek to improve the quality of Californias public service infrastructure.

How will local agencies benefit? Spheres of influence and boundaries will be more logical and oriented toward service delivery. Will promote regional efficiency, orderly growth and development. Standardized and digitized GIS maps Comprehensive local agency information directory Facilitation of inter- jurisdictional SOI conflicts Potential for identifying cost-cutting opportunities use of shared facilities, joint service agreements, contract service cost options, agency restructuring Comparisons with other agencies service costs

Who pays? The MSR and SOI updates are being funded through LAFCOs budget by the County, cities and developer contributions. SOI expansions requiring CEQA review will be funded by affected agencies and developer contributions In the future, LAFCO fees may reflect ongoing MSR and SOI update costs.

THANK YOU! The municipal service review process affords LAFCO and stakeholders a unique opportunity to revisit the range of municipal services provided in Yuba County. We hope the process will encourage public participation and maximum input from local agencies, as we work together to implement the intent of the Legislature at the local level.