Temporal &Spatial Dependency of the MOS RMF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4
Advertisements

EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Update of EPIC pn noise suppression K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Mallorca, Spain, 2009 March 31 – April 1 EPIC Calibration.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR Mallorca,
Clusters as calibration tools S. Molendi (IASF-MI)
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
Spectroscopic Data ASTR 3010 Lecture 15 Textbook Ch.11.
Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM MODEL PSF EFFECTS OF PILE-UP Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM Tutor: Martin Stuhlinger.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting Mallorca, Spain 26-27/10/06 XRT Point Spread Function in Slewing Mode.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay ESAC 04/10/05 Implementation of the MOS spatial/temporal DRM: Does it work ? Zeta Puppis: Checking the line.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay EPIC Calibration Meeting Saclay 24/09/03 Epoch dependant MOS QE and RMF and Cross-calibration with the PN.
Experience with combined Fe55/Vela SNR calibration - MOS Andrea Tiengo INAF, IASF-Milano In collaboration with: Mariachiara Rossetti (IASF-Milano) Martin.
Evaluation of the EPIC flux cross-calibration from 2XMM sources R. Saxton, S. Mateos, A. Read, S. Sembay Mateos et al., 2009, A&A, arXiv
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC Calibration Meeting Leicester University 30/09/04 Addendum to 1ES0102 Study - Search for similar low-energy.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, MPE K. Dennerl, 2006 May 04 EPIC pn at low energies: LW mode Properties of EPIC pn at low energies: LW mode.
Spectroscopy below ~20 keV Brian Dennis RHESSI/NESSI III 3/30 – 4/01/2005.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We present spectral fits for RHESSI and GOES solar.
Richard M. Bionta XTOD July 19-21, 2005 UCRL-PRES-xxxxxx X Ray Diagnostics LCLS FAC Meeting Oct. 27, 2005.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl Saclay/France, 2003 Sept offset map correction Spatial variation of the energy scale Energy correction for pixels.
XMM-Newton 1 M.Stuhlinger/P.Calderon, ESAC Re-appearance of the MOS1 CCD1 meteorite column during revs Madrid, 23. March 2010.
Energy Calibration using SNRs: preliminary results Andrea Tiengo INAF, IASF-Milano Mallorca, 6 November 2007 EPIC Calibration Meeting.
MOS 3x3 mode slow slew survey Richard Saxton October 2006.
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI and SXI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL) Fall 2003 AGU Meeting.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2005 February 1 Adjustment of spatial gain variations Adjustment of spatial gain variations of EPIC pn.
Slews: Fast and Slow. Fast Slew Status  XMMSL1: catalogue of slew sources released May 2006 Revs , 5180 detections, 2692 Revs , 5180 detections,
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read for the BGWG CAL/OPS/BG Meeting Palermo, Sicily 11-13/04/07 EPIC Background Working Group Summary: Meeting.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We use the RHESSI flare database to measure the center to limb.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
An XMM-ESAS Update Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting - BGWG Palermo - 11 March 2007.
MPE EPIC Cal Meeting – May 2006 Darren Baskill: XMM project: MOS gain monitoring MOS.
1 Understanding GRBs at LAT Energies Robert D. Preece Dept. of Physics UAH Robert D. Preece Dept. of Physics UAH.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 Suppression of the low-energy noise Suppression of the low-energy noise: an improved approach.
Deterministic Modeling of the MOS Background Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting Mallorca 1-3 February.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting Vilspa, Spain 23-24/03/04 XRT Point Spread Function - Conclusion of spectral and spatial.
EPIC PN background spectra for low surface brightness sources Michael Bauer (MPE), Wolfgang Pietsch (MPE) & Ginevra Trinchieri (INAF)
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemperature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay Mallorca 02/02/05 Temporal and spatial variability of the MOS RMF 1.Introduction and brief history of the.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting MPE, Germany 04-05/05/06 EPIC BGWG XMM-Newton EPIC BackGround Working Group founded (~1.
Can people meet from 2:40 to 3:30 on Tuesday, September 5?
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Correcting spatial inhomogeneities of the absolute energy scale K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Correcting spatial inhomogeneities.
Study of NICMOS Non-linearity B. Mobasher, A. Riess, R.de Jong, S.Arribas, E.Bergeron, R.Bohlin, H. Ferguson, A. Koekemoer, K. Noll, S. Malhotra, T. Wiklind.
0. To first order, the instrument is working very well ! 1.Evolution of the IR detector with time 2.Stability of the L channel 3.Saturation 4.Linearity.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
Introduction to Image Processing Grass Sky Tree ? ? Sharpening Spatial Filters.
A multi-colour survey of NGC253 with XMM-Newton Robin Barnard, Lindsey Shaw Greening & Ulrich Kolb The Open University.
SAG+SASWG Meeting Potsdam /15 PN Tasks – Status Report (update since Leicester) Hermann Brunner - MPE  epframes:  The dark quadrant problem.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
SH 51A-02 Evolution of the coronal magnetic structures traced by X-ray and radio emitting electrons during the large flare of 3 November 2003 N.Vilmer,
Edges.
The Slow Slew Survey Richard Saxton / Pedro Rodriguez November 2006.
Marcus Kirsch, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Center Page 1 EPIC ESAC Status of the EPIC calibration Presentation for XMM Newton UG 18 May 2006 Marcus.
Investigation into the strong residuals seen
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
S. Besse, M. A’Hearn and the DIXI team
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
Topic report Laser beam quality
Periodicity Search in X-ray data of RX J
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting
XMM-NEWTON EPIC CONTAMINATION MONITORING.
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
Pulse Profile Decomposition: Geometry and Beam Patterns of EXO and 4U
Calibration Activities – the MOS perspective
The spectral evolution of impulsive solar X-ray flares
Differential Emission Measure
Magnetars with Insight-HXMT
Presentation transcript:

Temporal &Spatial Dependency of the MOS RMF 1ES0102-72

MOS1 Thin filter 0447

MOS2 Thin filter 0433 0447

- Able to do spectral analysis of on- and off-‘patch’ regions 1ES0102 0.1-0.35 keV images ‘Good’ spectra – clean images ‘Bad spectra’ – bright ‘patch’ - Able to do spectral analysis of on- and off-‘patch’ regions

MOS1 Rev375 MOS1 Rev375 MOS1 Rev447 MOS2 Rev447 ‘patch’ ‘patch’ ‘non-patch’ ‘non-patch’

Only 0447 lies on MOS1 Boresight 11 obs. 0065-0803 Only 0447 lies on MOS1 Boresight 0447 MOS1 Boresight

Only 0433 & 0447 lie on MOS2 Boresight 12 obs. 0065-0803 Only 0433 & 0447 lie on MOS2 Boresight 0433 0447 MOS2 Boresight

- Investigate possible photon damage at boresights - Stacking of all-pattern, all-energy images from all imaging mode observations MOS1 (CCD1) 3249 Event Files 307501987 Events MOS2 (CCD1) 3223 Event Files 357647490 Events

- Investigate possible photon damage at boresights - Comparison of boresight positions (pn/RGS prime) with stacked images (zoom) MOS1 MOS2 RGS prime 299,299 RGS prime 309,295 pn prime 315,291 pn prime 303,305 310 300 290 280 300 320 290 310

N132D Mos1 Searching for ‘patch’ in other datasets/objects… 0283 Thin 0.1-0.35 keV 0.35-0.55 keV 0.55-0.8 keV 0.8-2.0 keV 0283 Thin 0606 Med 0771 Thin No Thin filter, ‘On-Patch’ Observations 0828 Thin

N132D Mos2 0283 Thin 0606 Med 0771 Thin No Thin filter, ‘On-Patch’ 0.1-0.35 keV 0.35-0.55 keV 0.55-0.8 keV 0.8-2.0 keV 0283 Thin 0606 Med 0771 Thin No Thin filter, ‘On-Patch’ Observations 0828 Thin

N132D - Rev 0606 - Medium filter M1 - ‘On-Patch’ M1 M2 M2 0.1-0.35 keV smoothed M2 M2 smoothed

N132D Mos1 0474 - Medium filter 0538 0542 0552 0.1-0.35 keV

N132D Mos2 0474 - Medium filter 0538 0542 0552 0.1-0.35 keV

- No spatial evidence for ‘patch’ found in N132D (larger remnant - more complex, spatially and spectrally - no thin-filter, on-boresight observations) - Other Objects? Coma – Many observations – All Medium Filter Tycho – 1 observation – Medium filter Kepler – 1 observation – Thick filter (No such features [spectral enhancements, spatial ‘patch’] seen in pn analysis - remnant however sometimes on CCD gap, or non-thin filter used)

1ES0102 - Proposed On- Boresight Raster Observation - Performed in Revs 894/900 4 observations: - 894 - 900a - 900b1 & 900b2 (flare-damaged) - 900c

0447

894-900 0447

0433 0447

894-900 433&447

- Fluxes calculated and compared (dotted lines show ±10% variation) 0.1-0.4 keV - Models (continuum + multi-Gaussian) fitted to spectra in narrow energy bands - Fluxes calculated and compared (dotted lines show ±10% variation) - On-Axis observations (433, 447, 894, 900) show marked departures from mean 0.4-0.8 keV 0.8-1.15 keV

- Zoom of 894-900 region (all on-axis)

- At higher energies, flux is very constant 1.15-2.0 keV - At higher energies, flux is very constant 2.0-6.0 keV - Across whole energy band, flux is quite well conserved 0.1-6.0 keV

M1(raw/smoothed) M2(raw/smoothed) MOS1 in timing mode 0.1-0.35 keV RAWX/Y images M1(raw/smoothed) M2(raw/smoothed) from Revs. 433, 447, 894, 900(a,b1/2,c) - MOS2 patch is compact, stationary, distinct - MOS1 patch is fuzzier, not so distinct, more diffuse - Are able to compare ‘patch’ and ‘non- patch’ spectra ,as before…

MOS1 Rev375 MOS1 Rev375 MOS1 Rev447 MOS2 Rev447 ‘patch’ ‘patch’ ‘non-patch’ ‘non-patch’

- peak ‘level’ (?) reached by rev 447 - little evolution thereafter M1 On-patch - peak ‘level’ (?) reached by rev 447 - little evolution thereafter 447 375 (off-axis)

- low-moderate effect at rev 447 - moderate evolution thereafter M1 Off-patch - low-moderate effect at rev 447 - moderate evolution thereafter 894 447 375 (off-axis)

- moderate effect at rev 433/447 (lower than M1) M2 On-patch - moderate effect at rev 433/447 (lower than M1) - moderate evolution (to peak level?) 447 375 (off-axis) 433

- low (zero) effect at rev 433/447 - moderate evolution thereafter M2 Off-patch - low (zero) effect at rev 433/447 - moderate evolution thereafter 375 (off-axis) 433 447

On-patch – Off-patch M1 375 (off-axis) M2 375 (off-axis)

On-patch – Off-patch M1 447 M2 447

On-patch – Off-patch M1 894 M2 894

On-patch – Off-patch M1 900a M2 900a

On-patch – Off-patch M1 900c M2 900c

Spatial Analysis of ‘Patch’ - Mosaic all ‘good’ off-axis sky (X/Y) images to obtain 0.1-0.35 keV images of ‘non-patch’ remnant - Using knowledge of remnant detector position and observation position angle, rotate and flip this image to correct RAWX/RAWY position & orientation for each ‘bad’ on-axis pointing - Subtract rotated/flipped image from each ‘bad’ on-axis RAWX/RAWY image (correcting for relative exposures) to obtain images of the remainder – the ‘patch’

- M1 patch is bright, and quite large already at rev 447 - Outer regions become larger and even brighter at later times

- M2 patch is not as bright as M1, and is initially compact - Outer regions become effected at later times

Mosaics (raw & smoothed) of ‘patch’ images for MOS1

Mosaics (raw & smoothed) of ‘patch’ images for MOS2

- Patch is only visible when remnant illuminates the particular area of detector - 1ES0102 acts like a torchlight – Final correction is made for this

New Boresights? MOS2 MOS1 Obvious places that are close, equidistant from pn/RGS boresights (and by pn-RGS boresight offset) and with relatively little photon impact

Discussion: Dealing with ‘The Patch’? – - New Boresight(s)? - Spatio-temporal RMF? - Correct on photon-by-photon basis?