MSFD reporting in 2018 on updates for Art. 8, 9 & 10

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Advertisements

Helsinki, Finland, November 2016
Alignment and Integration to MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: progress report
introducing the general approach
1.
MSFD integrated reporting
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Using EcAp/IMAP indicators for MSP: Experience from Montenegro
D5 EUTROPHICATION REVIEW PROCESS
Draft Article 8 MSFD assessment guidance
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
15th meeting of WG DIKE 27 April 2017, Brussels
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: reporting in 2012
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
15th meeting of WG DIKE, held jointly with WGs GES and POMESA
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Results of breakout group
D1 BIODIVERSITY REVIEW PROCESS
16 april 2009 Draft OSPAR’s MSFD Advice Manual on Biodiversity approaches to determining GES, setting of environmental targets and selecting indicators.
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Reporting on species and habitats under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and Habitats and Birds Directives Expert Group on Reporting under the.
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
European Commission DG Environment
Update on MSFD reporting
Action Points 16th meeting of the Working Group on
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
MSFD Com Dec 2010/ 477/ EU review Recommendations for D2
Summary and Action Points
Summary and action points 1-2 March 2017 Brussels
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
MSFD 2018 reporting outputs
Lists of commercially-exploited fish and shellfish
D1 Species Conclusions.
Reporting on species and habitats under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and Habitats and Birds Directives Joint meeting on biodiversity assessment.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Technical and administrative support for the joint implementation of the MSFD in Bulgaria and Romania - Phase 3 Draft Final Report   Specific contract.
Conclusions Group 3 Parallel sessions 2 and 3
MSFD reporting in 2018 on updates for Art. 8, 9 & 10
Proposed plan of work for ICES CIS contribution
WG GES, 6 December 2016, Brussels
Morning session: discussion on spatial scales
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD WG Reporting - 31 March 2009.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU Overview of main changes
1.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Reporting Units: Western Mediterranean Sea
Leonie Dransfeld MI Ireland
Working group on data & information sharing DIS under CIS of WFD
1.
Marine Reporting Units: Aegean-Levantine Sea
What can we learn from D3 assessments?
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
WG DIKE training 8 November 2017, Copenhagen
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
Presentation transcript:

MSFD reporting in 2018 on updates for Art. 8, 9 & 10 Worked examples and focused outputs GES Working Group on Good Environmental Status 22 March 2018, Brussels David Connor DG Environment C.2

Reporting is the final essential step in the process Resources needed at each stage (Art. 8 example): Art 8 schema Indicator-based assessments Process data into assessment 'products' (Art 19.3) Collect monitoring data (Art 11)

Worked examples - Art 8(1a, b) Demonstrate use of schema per Descriptor Examples for all criteria Scenarios for available assessments or no assessments Scenarios for regional and national assessments Highlight fields not needed per Descriptor (grey) Highlight fields needed for focused outputs (yellow)

Contributes to criteria X Schema class Key to slides Marine Unit MarineReportingUnit GES component Overall Status Feature A Feature B Element Status Element A Element B Element C Criteria Status Criteria A Criteria A Criteria B Parameter A Parameter A Parameter B Criteria values Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Criteria Status Criteria status Criteria status Criteria status Element A status Element B status Contributes to criteria X Element Status GESextentAchieved Overall Status GESachieved: by YYYY

Arrived in 6-year period Arrived in 6-year period Descriptor 2 MRU: subdivision X GES component: D2 Feature: New NIS Feature: Established NIS Element: Species A Element: Species B Element: Species C Criteria: D2C1 Criteria: D2C1 Criteria: D2C2 Parameter: Arrived in 6-year period Parameter: Arrived in 6-year period Parameter: Abundance Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Status: Not Good Status: Not Good Status: Not Good Status: Not good Status: Not good Contributes to D2C3 GESextentAchieved: 2 new NIS in 6-year period Not required GESachieved: by 2020

Descriptor 3 MRU: subregion X GES component: D3 Feature: Commercial fish Element: Species A Population A Element: Species B Population A Element: Species B Population B Criteria: D3C1 Criteria: D3C2 Criteria: D3C3 Parameter: Fishing mortality Parameter: Spawning stock biomass Parameter: Size Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Status: Good Status: Good Status: Not assessed Status: Good Status: Not good GESextentAchieved: 43% (X of Y populations in good status) GESachieved: by 2020

Descriptor 5 MRU: coastal waters of RBD X GES component: D5 Feature: Eutrophication Element: Nutrient A Element: HAB Species Element: Oxygen Criteria: D3C1 Criteria: D5C3 Criteria: D5C3 Parameter: Conc. in water Parameter: No. of HAB events Parameter: Duration of HAB events Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Status: Not good Status: Good Status: Not good Status: Good Status: Good GESextentAchieved: 75% (of MRU is not subject to eutrophication) GESachieved: after 2020, exception

Descriptor 8 ? MRU: territorial waters of RBD X GES component: D8 Feature: UPBTs Feature: non-UPBTs Feature: Species Element: A Element: B Element: C Element: Dog whelk Criteria: D8C1 Criteria: D8C1 Criteria: D8C1 Criteria: D8C2 Parameter: Conc. in water Parameter: Conc. In biota Parameter: Conc. In sediment Parameter: Imposex Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Threshold Values Trend Indicator Status: Not good Status: Good Status: Good Status: Not good Status: Good Status: Good ? GESextentAchieved: 50% (of UPBTs achieve thresholds) GESextentAchieved: 66% (of non- UPBTs achieve thresholds) GESachieved: after 2020, exception GESachieved: by 2020

Thresholds & proportions Assessment area: MRU or habitat or species population within MRU Samples achieving threshold value Samples not achieving TV Scenario 1: Proportion to achieve set as 90% Values achieved: report highest and lowest Result: 92% (22 of 24) achieve TV; parameter achieved

Thresholds & proportions Assessment area: MRU or habitat or species population within MRU Samples achieving threshold value Samples/area not achieving TV Scenario 2: Proportion to achieve set as 70% Values achieved: report highest and lowest Result: 55% of area achieves TV; parameter not achieved

Improving reporting process No info needed: grey cells in spreadsheet Predefined list of elements: autofill of ElementCode and ElementCodeSource Copy entry: enter some info. only once and copy record – only change specific fields (values that change)

Proposed changes (main points): Guidance text: clarify Art 9: allow multiple MRUs Integration rules: move to OverallStatus class Threshold/Proportion values achieved: need to clarify what is expressed (6-year average, last year etc)? Enumeration lists: some updates ThresholdValue: Upper and Lower RelatedIndicator: ever more than one per parameter?

Focused outputs Aim to clearly express extent to which GES is being achieved: Extent of pressures Extent of impacts Current status of species groups and broad habitat types How: Complete specific fields (Table 1 outputs highlighted in examples spreadsheet) 'Not assessed' as default when not yet known Use: Outputs per MRU aggregated to (sub)region Use in Art. 20, WISE-Marine