Evaluation of Training

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training Companies are in business to make money, and every business function is under pressure to show how it contributes to business success or face.
Advertisements

SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.
Effective Training: Systems, Strategies, and Practices, 4th Edition
Evaluation of Training
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
Effective Training: Strategies, Systems and Practices, 2 nd Edition Chapter Eight Evaluation of Training.
Training OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 23, Agenda Debrief on mid-semester feedback In-class writing Review training cycle Technology and training.
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Training OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 26, Agenda In-class writing Review training cycle Technology and training Return and discuss SAP exercise.
HOW TO DESIGN EFFECTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM
Talent Management - Training Design - AUC / SCE - HM 1 Welcome to Talent Management Training Design.
TRAINING, DEVELOPMENT AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Training the Workforce 8-1 Chapter 8.
Table of Contents Introduction Leadership vs. Management and Path Goal Theory Leadership Followership Management.
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Chapter 6 Training and Development in Sport Organizations.
EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING Group 5. Effectiveness of Training  What is “effectiveness of training”? Effectiveness means producing an intended result.
BBA 229 Training and Development
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation. Chapter 6 Training Evaluation Concepts Training Evaluation: The process of collecting data regarding outcomes needed to.
5 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Training and Developing Employees.
Group HR Training & Development Welcome Good Evening 18 th September 2012 Sukanya Patwardhan.
Evaluating HRD Programs
CPS ® and CAP ® Examination Review ADVANCED ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT By Garrison and Bly Turner ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper.
Avelino, Frynx DY, CRISTALLE KASALA, LEA ANNE PACAPAC, CASSANDRA PADILLA, JOSEPH ANTHONY SALABAO, NORMANDY.
Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM
Human Resource Management Lecture-23 Staffing HRM FUNCTIONS Employee & Labor Relations Safety & Health Compensation & Benefits Human Resource Development.
Chapter 4 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT. Introduction Need for organizations to build and sustain competencies that would provide them with competitive advantage.
Chapter-Nine Evaluation of Training Evaluation Phase InputProcess Output Evaluation Objectives Evaluation Strategy and Design Process Measures Design Issues.
SIUC Instructor Workshop Introduction to Assessment and Evaluation.
8-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Training the Workforce Chapter 8.
Evaluation of Training Rationale for Evaluation Types of Evaluation Data Validity Issue Evaluation Design.
Training Evaluation Chapter 6 6 th Edition Raymond A. Noe Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Output of Development Phase Training Title: Training Duration: Trainer: Seating: Target Population: Overall Training Objectives: After having attended.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 8 Development & Implementation of Training Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education,
7 Training Employees What Do I Need to Know?
Training processes for extension education
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT
Psych 638: Training needs assessment
Training the Workforce
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Evaluating performance management
Training & Development
HRM 326 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
HRM 326 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
Aligning Training with Strategy
Chapter 8 Performance Management and Employee Development
Chapter 8 Performance Management and Employee Development
Chapter Thirteen Fieldwork Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
Orientation and Training
Orientation and Training
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
Orientation and Training
Part IV SALES FORCE COMPETENCIES
Training OS652 HRM Fisher Oct. 7, 2004.
Measuring Course Effectiveness
Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model
Training Evaluation Chapter 6
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Orientation and Training
Training and Developing Employees
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Training and Developing Employees
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Training Chapter 9 Evaluation of Training Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Evaluation = 2 Types Process Evaluation Outcome Evaluation

Purpose of Process Evaluation Identify areas where training process can be improved Improved process leads to improved outcomes

Types of Questions to answer in a Process Analysis (Before Implementation) Were needs diagnosed correctly? Were needs translated into training objectives? Was an evaluation system designed to measure objectives? Was the training program designed to meet all the training objectives? Are the training methods appropriate for the learning objectives? Were the guidelines developed in the design phase used to develop the training content, materials and processes?

Types of Questions to answer in a Process Analysis (During Implementation) Was the trainer and techniques well matched to the objectives? Were lecture portions of the training effective? Was involvement encouraged/solicited? Were questions used effectively? Did the trainer conduct the various training methodologies (case study, role-play, etc.) appropriately? Was enough time allotted and was it used as intended? Did trainees follow instructions? Was there effective debriefing following exercises? Was time allowed for questions?

Who Is Interested in the Process Data Training Department Trainer: Yes, to determine what works well and what does not. Other trainers:  Yes, to the extent that process is generalizable Training manager Only if training is not successful or a problem is shown for a particular trainer. Customers Trainees: No Trainees’ supervisor Upper management:

Who Is Interested in the Outcome Data Reaction Learning Behavior Results Training Department Trainer Yes No Other Trainers Perhaps Training Manager Customers Trainees Trainees’ Supervisor Not really Only if no transfer Management

What do you evaluate at the Outcome Evaluation What do you evaluate at the end of training??? Your Training Objectives

Outcome Evaluation The KEY outcomes achieved by your training Trainee Reactions Learning Transfer to the job Organizational Results The same as your objectives 

Outcome Evaluation Design Alignment Between TNA and Outcomes Training Evaluation Objectives Outcomes Measured the same way TNA

Design Evaluation Evaluation Design Phase Activities Phase Reactions Determines Evaluation Phase Reactions Learning Performance Person Unit Org. Design Phase Activities Develop Training Objectives Evaluation Plan & Design

Reaction Questionnaires Training reaction questionnaires do not assess learning, but DO assess the trainee’s attitudes about and perception of the training.

Reaction Questionnaires continued At a minimum, the following categories should be assessed in a reaction questionnaire: Relevance/value of training (to trainees) Training content and materials Trainer’s behavior/effectiveness Facilities, activities and procedures

Reaction Questionnaires continued It should also provide an overall evaluation of the training experience.

Steps to Consider in Developing a Reaction Questionnaire – Part 1 of 2 Determine what you want to find out (consider training objectives). Develop a written set of questions to obtain the information. Develop a scale to quantify respondents’ data. Make forms anonymous so participants will feel free to respond honestly. Ask for subgroup information (e.g., young vs. old; minority vs. non- minority). This could be valuable in determining effectiveness of training for different cultures, for example, which may be lost in an overall assessment.

Steps to Consider in Developing a Reaction Questionnaire – Part 2 of 2 Allow space for “Additional Comments” in order to allow participants the opportunity to mention things you might not have considered. Decide the best time to give the questionnaire to get the information you want. If right after training, ask someone other than the instructor to administer and pick up the information. If some time later, develop a mechanism to obtain a high response rate (e.g., encourage the supervisor to allow trainees to complete the questionnaire on company time).

Types of Outcomes and Examples of Factors Affecting those Outcomes Trainee characteristics Trainer behavior Reactions Trainee readiness for the course Trainee motivation to learn Design, materials, and content Learning Training’s transfer of training effectiveness Motivational forces in the job setting Opportunity to apply learned KSAs on the job Job Behavior External environment of the organization Internal environment of the organization Employee performance, KSAs, and needs Organizational Results

Examples of assessing objectives Training objectives are set in the Design Phase based on “Gaps” identified. Training objectives are assessed in the Evaluation Phase Let’s look at some examples of how this is done for reaction objectives.

Reaction Objectives -example At least 75% of participants will rate the following aspects of training a 4 or higher on a 5 point scale (with 5 being the highest rating):  1. Quality of the training content 2. Relevance of the training content 3. Effectiveness of each trainer 4. Overall effectiveness

Table of Reaction Results Training Content Strongly Disagree - Strongly Agree 1 2 3 4 5 Rating of 4 or 5 Ave % Quality 0% 13% 40% 33% 73% 78% Relevance 53% 86% Overall Rating 27% 47% 74%

Trainer Overall Effectiveness Ratings 1 = Low 5 = High Trainer 1 2 3 4 5 Rating of 4 or 5 Average Rating A 0% 27% 41% 32% 73% 4.05 B 13% 19% 36% 68% 3.87 C 40% 60% 100% 4.60  

Financial Evaluation Actual savings based on outcomes Cost of performance prior to training Cost of performance after training = Performance savings - Cost of Training = Cost Savings Return on Investment ratio (ROI) = Cost Savings/Cost of Training

Cost Savings for Grievance Reduction Training Pretraining Post training Management time 10 hours/grievance 10 hrs. X 63 grievances = 630 hrs. 10 hrs. X 8 grievances = 80 hrs. Union Rep’s time 7.5 hrs/grievance 7.5 X 63 grievances = 472 ½ hrs 7.5 X 8 grievances = 60 hrs. Total Cost Management time Union rep’s time Total 630 hrs X $50 = $31,500.00 472 ½ hrs X $.= $11,812.50 $43,312.50 80 hrs. X $50 = $4,000.00 60 hrs. X $25 = $1,500.00 $5,500.00 Reduction in cost of grievances: 43,312.50 – 5,500.00 = $37,812.50 Cost of training: -32,430.00 Cost saving for the first year $ 5,382.50