Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 OVERVIEW. FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICES The Privacy Act is primarily concerned with fair information practices. The Privacy Act is primarily.
Advertisements

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) – 1972, 1988 By, Kevin Iida The FIFRA was amended in 1996 by the Food Quality Protection Act.
Chapter 8 AP Environmental Science. * 1. Gives the EPA the authority to control pesticides. Which act is this? * A. Toxic Substances Control Act * B.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Rocky Beem 2011 Smithfield Environmental Conference.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Larrica AC Devin.
Confidentiality and HIPAA
HIPAA PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS Dana L. Thrasher Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC (205) ; Victoria Nemerson.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
1 EPA’S PESTICIDE REGISTRATION PROGRAM Eugene Thilsted Strategic Agriculture Initiative Coordinator Environmental Protection Agency – Region 6 Dallas,
1 Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division Sheryl K. Reilly, Ph.D. Chief, Biochemical Pesticides Branch
Pesticide Labels & Safety Data Sheets Developed by Carol Black WSU Pesticide Safety Education.
Structural Pesticide Ordinance Development In A Tribal Community Presented At The 17th Annual Region 9 Tribal EPA Conference October 21-23, 2009 Barry.
November 14, 2011 Presented by Robert Stockel, Agricultural Inspector/Biologist III San Luis Obispo County Agricultural Department.
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
PESTICIDE LABELING Main method of communication between manufacturer and user Main method of communication between manufacturer and user Label: information.
1 Pesticides Sherry L. Glick Office of Pesticide Programs U.S. EPA
Briefing for Acting EPA Administrator (Your Name Here) Background on the Alar Situation January 2003 Richard Wilson based upon an analysis by John Graham.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
Section 18 Final Rule Overview Presentation originally given by EPA at Emergency Exemption Process Revisions Workshop, revised by Laura Quakenbush.
Pesticide Labeling Reeves Petroff
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Administrativ e Law.
Pesticide Labeling.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 45 Environmental Law Chapter 45 Environmental Law.
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
Environmental Compliance Assistance Workshop for Colleges and Universities September 13-14, 2005 Chapel Hill, NC.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans08-1 Unit 13 Regulation of Pesticides Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? What is an environmental impact.
 Nuisance.  Person liable if they use their property in a manner that unreasonably interferes with others’ rights to use or enjoy their own property.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
Administrative Penalty Program SB Regulatory Item California Air Resources Board Enforcement Division Public Hearing December 12, 2002 Sacramento,
Chapter 46 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Regulatory Processes for Pesticides Mark Hartman Antimicrobials Division (AD) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances United States Environmental.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Ecology and the Environment Mr. Corsini - NWHS.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
Chapter 39 Environmental Law. 2  Under what common law theories may polluters be held liable?  What is an environmental impact statement? What is the.
Briefing for Acting EPA Administrator (Your Name Here) Background on the Alar Situation January 2010 Richard Wilson.
Introduction to FIFRA Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act Chapter 1 Section I of the Pest Bear & Affiliates Service Personnel Development Program.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 1972, 1988 When the FIFRA was first passed in 1947, it gave the United States Department of Agriculture.
Overview of Risk Assessment and Risk Management of PIPs in the U.S.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 25: Environmental Law.
Administrative Penalty Framework under the Safety Codes Act An enforcement tool under the Safety Codes Act.
FIFRA 101 Karl Arne May 17, 2010 Karl Arne May 17, 2010.
Chapter 6 Administrative Agencies Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 46: Environmental Law By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Interest Approach Begin the lesson by handing each student a copy of LS–A. The only verbal instructions you should give your students are for them to read.
Core Values & Principles in Organic Organic Methods in Agriculture Jay Feldman US Congressional Hearing June 14, 2016.
Enabling Business, Empowering Consumers. DEPARTMENT.
California Healthy Schools Act
Pesticide Labels & Safety Data Sheets
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Providing Access to Your Data: Handling sensitive data
Section 18 Emergency Exemption
Laws Relating to Accreditation, the use of NGABs, and Enforcement
Liability Under CERCLA
An Overview of Pesticides:; Its Uses, Abuses, Effects and Regulations
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Environmental Legislation Logan Hobbs
FIFRA 1972, 1988 (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act)
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
Herbicide Registration & Environmental Impact
California Department of Pesticide Regulation
Presentation transcript:

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Purpose To govern the use, sale, and labeling of pesticides Scope All pesticide manufacturers must submit data regarding the safety and efficacy of their pesticides Implementation of the program is by the EPA; but where a state has a federally approved pesticide program, the state is the primary enforcement authority

History & Antecedents of FIFRA FIFRA is almost exclusively a “federal” act in that states are given little authority to deal with the regulatory issues addressed by FIFRA Modified over time in an attempt to achieve the goal of protecting humans and the environment In its original iteration, FIFRA dealt more with form, such as the information on pesticide labels, than it did with the substance of protecting humans and the environment

Pesticides Pesticide Defined as any substance intended for “preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest” or any substance intended for use as a “plant regulator, defoliant or dessicant” Herbicides Chemical agents used against plants Insecticides Chemical agents used against insects Fungicides Chemicals used against fungi Rodenticides Chemical substances used against rodents Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) The office the EPA uses to track registration of pesticides

Registration Criteria Unreasonable adverse effects A term defining the standard used in registering pesticides pursuant to FIFRA Defined as “any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, taking into account the economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of the use of the pesticide” Labeling The process of affixing warnings and information regarding pesticides to pesticide containers Enforcement

Evaluating Pesticides for Registration 4 conditions must be met before a pesticide can be registered The composition of the pesticide must be such as to warrant the proposed claim for it The labeling and other materials for the pesticide must comply with the provisions of FIFRA The pesticide will perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment When used in accordance with common practice, the pesticide will not generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment

Registration of Pesticides Types of Registration Conditional Registrations Authorized by FIFRA under a section entitled “Registration Under Special Circumstances” that provides for conditional registration for pesticides identical or very similar to currently registered products new uses for existing pesticide registrations pesticides containing active ingredients not contained in any currently registered pesticide for which data needs to be obtained for registration Notice of Rebuttable Presumption Against Registration (RPAR) When a RPAR has been issued for a pesticide, conditional registration is not permitted

Registration of Pesticides (cont.) Reregistration “Me-too” pesticides Featherbedding Trade Secrets 2 Types of Registered Use General Use Registration Preferred over restricted use registration Restrictions, other than FIFRA restrictions and requirements, are not imposed on the sale and use of a pesticide Restricted Use Registration EPA restrictions imposed to mitigate identified potential harmful effects that are not severe enough to prevent registration but require mitigation in some manner Effects of Registration Cancellation of Registration

FIFRA Suspension Orders Generally Sought by the EPA administrator when it is believed that a pesticide presents an “imminent hazard” or an imminent risk The sale, distribution, and use of a pesticide is immediately suspended 2 Types Emergency Suspensions Infrequently used An order immediately suspending the sale, distribution, and use of a pesticide where the EPA administrator believes it poses an imminent risk/hazard No opportunity for a hearing Action is taken ex parte To overturn an emergency suspension order, a party must demonstrate that the order was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or “not issued in accordance with the procedures established by law” Ordinary Suspensions An order suspending the sale, distribution, and use of a pesticide because the EPA administrator believes it to be an imminent risk/hazard This differs from an emergency suspension in that with an ordinary suspension, the registrant has an opportunity to request an expedited pre-order hearing

How Much Risk is Needed for Purposes of a FIFRA Suspension Order? 5 Factors Used to Analyze Risk The seriousness of the threatened harm The immediacy of the threatened harm The probability that the threatened harm would result The benefits to the public of the continued use of the pesticides in question during the suspension process The nature and extent of the information before the administrator at the time the decision is made

Enforcement Written warning In lieu of a written warning, the EPA can issue a stop sale, use, or removal order or seek a seizure order from the federal court Civil penalties Range from upward of $1,000 per violation for private users or applicators to upward of $5,000 for violations by a registrant, wholesaler, retailer, or distributor Mitigating or aggravating factors used by the EPA to determine the amount of the fine requested, the effect of the fine on the viability of the business, and the seriousness of the violation Criminal penalties May be imposed for knowing about FIFRA violations Fines up to $1,000 for a user or applicator and fines up to $25,000 for a firm Jail sentences may be imposed for officers of a firm or private users or applicators