ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking 2? - Status JU-1 and wishes for JU-2 Key slides presented by Commission and ARTEMIS-IA on the ARTEMIS-JU Governing Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title of presentation ARTEMIS Industry Association Ad ten Berg ARTEMIS Industry Association The association for R&D actors in embedded systems.
Advertisements

Finding partners Chantal Schoen Office Operations Manager ARTEMIS Industry Association E: 13 March 2013 Brussels, Belgium.
ARTEMIS Industry Association & ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking ARTEMIS Industry Association The association for R&D actors in embedded systems.
Alan Cross, European Commission FP7 Open Day Riga, 16 November 2010 EU Framework Programme: taking stock, and looking ahead.
NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.
Dr. Andreas Wild Executive Director, ENIAC JU
Welcome to the 2015 ARTEMIS-IA Brokerage Event Jan Lohstroh Secretary General 2015 Jan. 21.
FP7 from a large firm’s perspective EPP-ED Group Hearing on FP7 European Parliament, Brussels, September 22, 2005 Dr Jan van den Biesen MBA VP Philips.
Czech Republic in Eniac and Artemis JU Jiří Kadlec ÚTIA AV ČR, v.v.i. Tel Inovace 2011,
Artemis project proposal round 2013 Johan Lukkien, Peter van Otterloo Monday, January 21, 2013.
The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 Judit Fejes Executive Agency of Small and Medium Enterprises (EASME)
EU policy objectives and European research on Smart Grids European Commission, DG Research Henrik Dam Research Programme Officer ADDRESS international.
Sixth Framework Programme INTRODUCTION . Contents Contents of FP6 Instruments in FP6 Financing Budgets Timetable Highlights.
Director, DG RTD, Directorate International Cooperation
Research Obj.: ICT 26 – 2014: Photonics KET What are you looking for? Photonics: Major S&T and R&I progress to sustain competitiveness & leadership in.
The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) Georgi Dimitrov, European Commission TCI Annual Conference 2010 Facilitating global outreach.
1 International Cooperation Aspects and Instruments of the European Union Strategic Energy Technologies (SET) Plan Ismo Koskinen Energy Counsellor Delegation.
András Siegler - ERTRAC National Platforms Workshop, Budapest, 5/9/2008 The role of Technology Platforms in European Research ERTRAC National Platforms.
September 13, 2007SGH&M2B International&Training Workshop What does the European Technology Platform “Innovative Medicines initiative” offer? Vitalijs.
IST Call 5 Preparatory Workshop on “Collaborative Working Environments” Nuria de Lama Las ideas no duran mucho. Hay que hacer algo con ellas.
The EU framework programme for research and innovation Christophe Cotillon - Actia.
Introduction to ARTEMIS Date, location Jan Lohstroh – Secretary General ARTEMIS Industry Association Introduction to ARTEMIS Barcelona 2010, December 14.
Title of presentation ARTEMIS Industry Association Finding partners Else Embregts, PR & Communications Manager, 1 March 2011, Nuremberg, Germany ARTEMIS.
ARTEMIS Success Stories ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking 1 The ARTEMIS programme Eric Schutz, Executive Director ARTEMIS-JU 4/10/2011, Brussels ARTEMIS Joint.
COSME Financial Instruments for SMEs 20 March 2014 George Lemonidis (Deputy Head of Unit) Unit D3: SME Access to Finance Directorate General for Enterprise.
ARTEMIS Call for proposals 2008 Tom Bo Clausen “Embedded Systems & Control” European Commission, Brussels.
Title of presentation ARTEMIS Industry Association Summer Camp 2011 June 14, Brussels Agenda and Organisation Ad ten Berg ARTEMIS-IA office ARTEMIS Industry.
Partnerships Horizon 2020 / Eurostars expert: Dr. Radosław Piesiewicz.
HORIZON 2020 Launch Conference 16 January 2014, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Paris Brokerage: Presentation ARTEMIS Industry Association JOURNEE ARTEMIS ! le 04 Février 2013 à Paris Présentation du 6 ème appel ARTEMIS Laila Gide.
ARTEMIS Industry Association Title Presentation - 1 e.g. SCALOPES e.g. SCAlable LOw Power Embedded PlatformS.
Evaluation and Impact Assessment of European FP for R&D :
Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario
ARTEMIS-IA SPRING EVENT
“Self-Sustaining Innovation Ecosystems for European Leadership”
ARTEMIS Call 2013 Highlights and How it Works
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
ARTEMIS Brokerage Event Barcelona, December 14th 2010
European (Sector) Social Dialogue overview & update
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
Strengthening the foundations of ERA
ROBERT LOWSON EEA COORDINATOR GMES BUREAU.
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
South-East European Space
Alessandra Luchetti Deputy Head of Unit
ARTEMIS Industry Association & ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking
Building ARTEMIS.
IMI Member States Contact Group
Research Obj.: ICT 26 – 2014: Photonics KET
From Horizon 2020 to FP9: Mid-term evaluation and foresight
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
ESS Cooperation: New Financial supporting frameworks?
Finding partners Else Embregts, PR & Communications Manager,
EUSDR Action Plan - Revision
Summer Camp & 10 June, Rome Agenda and organisation
Boosting Social Enterprises in Europe December 3-4, 2015
Purpose of the presentation
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
ARTEMIS Industry Association & ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Legal Documents Call info day May 21st 2008 C. van Mourik.
Director «Components & Systems»
Introduction to the Summer Camp 2010
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
DPN OFFICIAL LAUNCH EVENT
League of Advanced European Neutron Sources
ReConfirm Regional Co-operation Networks for Industrial Modernisation
Experience of the implementation of FP6; preparations towards FP7
Training on joint doctoral studies
Presentation transcript:

ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking 2? - Status JU-1 and wishes for JU-2 Key slides presented by Commission and ARTEMIS-IA on the ARTEMIS-JU Governing Board on 2011 May 17 Jan Lohstroh, Secretary General ARTEMIS-IA ARTEMIS Industry Association The association for R&D actors in embedded systems

Observations current JU By ARTEMIS-IA

Top level observations current JU 1/2 PRO’s A new initiative with a strategic top-down approach is up and running with a big value for Europe based upon a well supported SRA The industry driven projects have a large footprint with a rich content addressing societal needs (see next slide) Industry’s commitment, represented by ARTEMIS-IA, is unchanged high since the start of the JU See oversubscription of the calls for instance call 2010: 28 projects evaluated above threshold, only 11 funded See our CEO-letter of 2011 May 13 See SRA 2011 (official launch on 2011 May 18) See work by Working Groups Combining strengths of many players (industries, small and big, and knowledge institutes) targeted to improve R&D and innovation efficiency in Europe SUMMARY: programme has proven its usefulness

The industry driven projects have a large footprint with a rich content addressing societal needs Examples are project clusters on: Safety and reliability (CESAR, RECOMP, MBAT, pSafeCer) Electric Vehicle (POLLUX in relation to ENIAC-EEECAR and FP7-CASTOR/Smarttop) Low-power Multi-Core for embedded (SCALOPES, SMECY,) Energy efficient communities (buildings and districts) (eDIANA , ENCOURAGE and IoE) E-health (CHIRON, HIGH PROFILE) “Things of the internet” (SOFIA, SIMPLE, SMARCOS, iLAND) Manufacturing (iFEST, eSONIA, R3-COP)

Top level observations current JU 2/2 Con’s Commitment by Member States much lower than envisioned, leading to situations where relevant/important projects could not be executed Increasing number of National eligibility criteria Very long and different signing procedures by some Member States No funding for non-R&D (innovation projects), due to national and JU funding rules SUMMARY: Some very good proposals have not been started

OTHER observations Current JU Pro’s Impact and visibility of embedded systems in Europe has increased Con’s Unbalanced funding by Member States (not in line with the size of their Embedded Systems activities and national demand for project funding) Significant differences in funding rates between Member States, usually lower than in FP Large programme overhead (in costs and effort), partly due to the fact that the JU is a Community Body Considerable overhead effort by project consortia Large effort by ARTEMIS-IA to collect 1.5% fee needed to fulfill its financial commitment to the JU and still a significant number of free-riders

Wishes future JU By ARTEMIS-IA

Top level wishes future JU Future JU with a first call in 2014 JU will be essential for Europe, because embedded systems are crucial key enablers for the future electronics are everywhere in all our daily lives and continuously change the world and our way of living Embedded systems will strongly contribute to addressing the grand societal challenges Finding a construction with stable funding commitments per year is essential commitments per Member State Innovation projects should be fundable by EC only? Max. 6 calls More top down and leave bottom up projects to ITEA Simplification and flexibility needed

Other wishes future JU 1/3 Essential boundary conditions are: A more flexible, lean and mean legal structure than the current JU with its status of Community Body, to enable a truly balanced public-private partnership preferably by means of a mixed public-private body with a light model financial regulation, as proposed by the Commission for the revision of the EU Financial Regulation and in line with the recommendations of the JTI Sherpas Group; Better alignment of Member state rules and procedures (details next slide) A smarter instrument for national and EU co-funding to execute transnational collaborative R&D projects

Other wishes future JU 2/3 Elements of attention for a tri-partite continuation: Continuation of the approach of the present JU: programme is industry driven, following a strategic top-down approach All con’s of present JU should be addressed Funding commitments per Member State for the total programme Balanced funding by Member States Short procedures in Member States No additional National eligibility criteria Possibility to fund non-R&D projects (those to be funded by EC only?) All project partners to contribute to the running costs Etc.

Other wishes future JU 3/3 Elements of attention for a bi-partite continuation if a tri-partite continuation would not be possible under better conditions: It would automatically mean: Equal conditions for all project consortia Single procedure for all project consortia Innovation projects can be funded

Thank you for your attention! ARTEMIS Industry Association