Alan Fisher OSPAR Pilot project on Ecological Quality Objectives (2002-2005) for the North Sea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASSESSMENT ISSUES An EU Perspective Ladislav Miko Director, Protecting the Natural Environment, DG Environment, European Commission.
Advertisements

Groundfish Management Policy Objectives Diana Evans NPFMC staff North Pacific Fishery Management Councils.
The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
[ Slide Title ] Session II: Reporting back from breakout session NAME, Rhodes University 7 th Biennial GEF International Waters Conference Bridgetown,
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
Building Resilient Marine Protected Areas in Madagascar By Harifidy Ralison 31 January 2008.
Cetacean by-catch M.B. Santos Workshop Marine Environment and fisheries.
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
Should we integrate assessments of the state-based descriptors? YES – Considering that the MSFD is underpinned by ecosystem management approach, it is.
Ecosystem approach to fisheries (western Channel and Celtic Sea) Simon Jennings, Cefas, UK.
Rodney Forster Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, UK Products from the EMECO North Sea Observatory: an EU policy.
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ICES cooperative research report.
The Landing Obligation in the European Union Common Fisheries Policy
North American Marine Protected Areas Network Commission for environmental cooperation Biodiversity Conservation Working Group CEC Council Session - 24.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
Ecosystem based management: definitions and international principles
New EU Multi-Annual Programme
Adaptation Workshop - AOSIS
Sustainable Fisheries in the Black Sea
‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
DG MARE, European Commission
Cumulative Effects Assessment and Marine Spatial Planning
Using EcAp/IMAP indicators for MSP: Experience from Montenegro
GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES
Guidance report: Methodology for the assessment of ecological coherence of MPA’s Henk Wolters 30 October 2014.
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
Follow up of the Saint Malo seminar conclusions in the Batic Sea
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
EU Biodiversity Strategy in context
Integrating D1 indicators to ecosystem component level
senior social scientist Trondheim, Norway
GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS IN THE PROPOSED MARINE STRATEGY DIRECTIVE
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Guidance on Integrating Adaptation into Land Management
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
Conclusions: Parallel session 2, Group 2
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Regional workshop on Approaches to the implementation and monitoring of community-based ecosystem approach to fisheries management (CEAFM): finding common.
Group 2.
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
No: need to identify the sources and adress totally new pressures
Morning session: discussion on spatial scales
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
European Red List of Habitats
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Progress of intersessional work
1.
OSPAR biodiversity assessments Intermediate Assessment 2017
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Assessment of current management plan (EoH Tool 5)
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 3+
Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Existing BSAP follow up
Assessment scales and aggregation
Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting
Head, Marine Conservation
By-catch work at ICES Lara Salvany,
Presentation transcript:

Alan Fisher OSPAR Pilot project on Ecological Quality Objectives (2002-2005) for the North Sea

Aim: clear objectives to implement OSPAR Ecosystem Approach Alan Fisher Aim: clear objectives to implement OSPAR Ecosystem Approach Defining a healthy and sustainable marine ecosystem Assessment of the current situation Good communication tools Showing whether OSPAR achieves its aims

Alan Fisher The EcoQO concept (1) 10 issues for the North Sea 1. Commercial fish 6. Benthic communities species 2. Threatened and 7. Plankton communities declining species species 3. Sea mammals 8. Habitats 4. Seabirds 9. Nutrient budgets and production 5. Fish communities 10. Oxygen consumption

Alan Fisher The EcoQO concept (2) 21 EcoQOs Example of an EcoQO: “Annual by-catch levels of harbour porpoise should be reduced to levels below 1.7% of the best population estimate”

Monitoring and Assessment Alan Fisher Monitoring and Assessment DPSIR: Driving force Pressure State Impact Response

Process of the Pilot Project Alan Fisher Process of the Pilot Project Co-ordination: Overall lead of the Pilot Project by The Netherlands and Norway Support: Lead countries for individual EcoQOs

Comparison EMS guidance with 7 OSPAR criteria Alan Fisher Comparison EMS guidance with 7 OSPAR criteria Objectives, indicators, limits and targets (EMS) similar to OSPAR approach. OSPAR includes DPSIR: broadening from environment to sustainable development. Management: some EcoQOs ready for implementation, learning by doing

Alan Fisher Costs requirements Based on existing databases Harmonisation of monitoring

Comparison with EA: coherent actions Alan Fisher Comparison with EA: coherent actions Prioritising lead to a set of 21 EcoQOs Focus mainly on environmental coherence (by scientific coherence) Via DPSIR indirect focus on other areas of coherence

Alan Fisher Lessons learnt (1) “Best practices” Much knowledge available Quality control by ICES Criteria for good EcoQOs Communication tools: public and politics Stakeholder involvement

Alan Fisher Lessons learnt (2) “Obstacles”: Complex subject Hard instrument needed No success on the short term Complex: Many organizations involved Difficult to link some EcoQOs to human activities

Alan Fisher Recommendations (1) Take advantage of experiences of the North Sea pilot project Taylor made: adapt issues for regional seas Development and implementation of objectives on “regional level” Prioritising of actions

Alan Fisher Recommendations (2) Communication with stakeholders is very important Objectives based on existing monitoring to reduce costs Implementation of EMS objectives within OSPAR by EcoQOs

Alan Fisher Stakeholder workshop Oslo, 13-14 December 2004 Aim: Discuss opportunities and difficulties Comment on the Pilot Project Advise to OSPAR