Erasmus Evaluation 2014/2015 International Office.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.

Advertisements

Panel Reviewer Training Overview 1 ANA Objective Panel Review Process Each year, ANA convenes panels of experts to objectively analyze and score eligible.

___State Program Improvement Planning (PIP) Process and Expectations Date (7/30/07)

1 Response to the Employee Survey Recommendations.

Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture International Credit mobility.

Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.

ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM Strategic Priorities refining assessment practice and improving academic feedback research-led teaching use.

- Objective of the Program Evaluation - The process of the Program Evaluation.

Quality in Vocational Training in relation to the SCIH project Basic Quality Measures Hargašová Oľga, Ing. SSOŠ SD Jednota Šamorín.

Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.

PRESENTATION Internationalisation Policy for Higher Education Malaysia

The London Metropolitan University Writing Centre: An overview of teaching and research Savita Bakhshi School of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences,

Components of a Quality Induction Program Shirley P. Andrews Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia.

PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.

Athena Swan/Gender Equality Charter Mark An overview of Academic Promotion and Recognition and Reward Elaine Reid, College of Social Sciences David Tedman,

2015 Commendations and Citations Information Session.

Kim England Head of Personnel Operations & Staff Development University of Bristol.

Switch off your Mobiles Phones or Change Profile to Silent Mode.

Towards Bologna Process Creative and Innovative Thinking and their incorporation in syllabi.

Quality in Vocational Training. Q uality in G eneral S tate A dministration QUALITY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL AUTONOMOUS LOCAL.

UTEP Office of Research and Sponsored Projects Results from Spring 2004 Satisfaction Survey SOURCE: UTEP Center for Institutional Evaluation, Research.

National Erasmus+ Office - Jordan Education and Culture International credit mobility with partner countries.

AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.

PS 3 Organisation of the mobility Piedad RIVAS, EACEA EMECW project manager.

Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture International opportunities for Higher Education.

THE NEED TO TRAIN THE TRAINERS. Who University lecturers /academics Teaching assistants (such as research students who do tutoring etc) Senior academics.

Education and Culture International credit mobility with partner Countries Ayna Chorekliyeva Coordinator of National Erasmus+ Office in Turkmenistan Information.

Call for Proposals for the implementation of mobility actions in the academic year 2008/2009 Piedad RIVAS, EM ECW Project Manager Erasmus Mundus and External.

Copyright  Altran SDB, All rights reserved. ALTRAN SDB.

1 Quality Assurance System UOC Planning and Quality Office

YFU experience Ensuring quality via the “International Basics Standards”

Automated feedback processing in the educational process VІI SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL SEMINAR WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION "ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE.

AHPGS ON SITE VISIT NOVEMBER 2015 Vice -Deanship for Development and Quality November 2015.

Dat e: in 12 pts Erasmus+ Генствами Education and Culture International credit Mobility National Erasmus+ Office in Kyrgyzstan 28 November 2014.

Erasmus+ Higher Education (ECHE) in de praktijk José Ravenstein, NA Erasmus+, Juni 2015.

1311A.1 - Achieving Success as PresidentP-V #1  Feature quality programming  Require manual speeches  Expect effective evaluations  Encourage active.

GOT 2003 Customer Satisfaction Survey: Results Summary Office of Policy & Customer Relations September 4, 2003.

Education and Culture International credit mobility with partner countries.

How to be prepared for implementation of credit mobility in Erasmus+ ? From experiences of Polish National Agency for the LLP-Erasmus programme Beata Skibińska,

– Closed User Group – EBA CLEARING’s Quality Survey December 2015 Results.

1 Researcher mobility Why and How?. 2 NTNU as an example Vision: To be internationally outstanding Objective: The entire organization upholds quality.

Obtaining your EDI Funding

Experience from university as participant in PASCL project

Accreditation External Review

International credit mobility with partner countries

Academic Year UNC Asheville

Erasmus+ Evaluation 2014/2015 International Office.

The positive impact of personal advising training

Erasmus+ Come to study or teach in Europe

Slide Set 2012 Department 6.0 – Planning, Development and Controlling Office, Division 6.4, RWTH Aachen University May 2012.

Instructional Technology Plan Overview

Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges

European TRAINING FOUNDATION

Erasmus+ Come to study or teach in Europe Erasmus+

Developing the Guided Learner Journey

The UK Professional Standards Framework

Erasmus+ Come to study or teach in Europe Erasmus+

ERASMUS+ STAFF MOBILITY Confirmation of Participation

Internationalisation strategy at BUCKS

Introduction to the training

Workforce Development Goal

Youth v. Adult Roles Role of Adults.

Influence of Erasmus+ mobility on higher education students’ competences and attitudes Warsaw, November 2018.

Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007

Erasmus+ Come to study or teach in Europe Erasmus+

PARTICIPANTS’ REPORTS

ERASMUS+ STAFF MOBILITY Confirmation of Participation

Student Involvement in Quality Assurance in Higher Education

Evaluate the integral {image}

Presentation transcript:

Erasmus Evaluation 2014/2015 International Office

1- Participants‘ Profile Activity Type Total Number of Participants Student mobility for studies (outbound) 271 Student mobility for traineeships (outbound) 117 Total 388 Activity Type Total Number of Participants Student mobility for studies (inbound) 272 Activity Type Total Number of Participants Staff mobility for teaching (outbound) 57 Staff mobility for training (outbound) 5 Total 62 Activity Type Total Number of Participants Staff mobility for teaching (inbound) 39

2- Participants‘ Feedback 2.1- Participants‘ overall satisfaction with their mobility experience Activity Type Number of students that submitted a final report % of students who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Student mobility for studies (outbound) 271 94,83% Student mobility for traineeships (outbound) 117 97,44% Total 388 95,62% Activity Type Number of students that submitted a final report % of students who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Student mobility for studies (inbound) 272 96,32%

Activity Type Number of staff that submitted a final report % of staff who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Staff mobility for teaching (outbound) 57 100,00% Staff mobility for training (outbound) 5 Total 62 Activity Type Number of staff that submitted a final report % of staff who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Staff mobility for teaching (inbound) 39 100,00%

2.2. Charter provisions Equal treatment and integration Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report % of students who stated that equal academic treatment was ensured Student mobility for studies (inbound) 272 74,26% Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report % of students who stated that their integrationto UR‘s everyday life was good or very good Student mobility for studies (inbound) 271 84,87% Mentoring and support Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report % of students who were satisfied or very satisfied with the academic mentoring & administrative support Student mobility for studies (inbound) 271 90,41%

3 Recognition for satisfactorily completed activities Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report with finalised recognition process % of students who got full recognition at the time of their report submission Student mobility for studies (outbound) 148 55,41% Student mobility for traineeships (outbound) 66 90,91% Total 214 66,36%

International Office