Agenda Where We Are in the Planning Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 POLICY ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY: M.B. WILLIAMS DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.
Advertisements

1 OAS Financial Management Challenges and Program- Budget Implications 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE October 2008.
SJR 88 Higher Education Finance Study Commission November 10, 2010.
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
FBOE K-20 Accountability Project CEPRI Workgroup June 13, 2002 Orlando, Florida.
Southern Regional Education Board 1 Preparing Students for Success in High School.
House Committee on Workforce and Technical Skills February 20, 2001.
Council for Education Policy, Research and Improvement CEPRI Projects Presentation to State Board of Education February 17, 2004.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 R-2 Report: Graduation A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional Services Staff Research and Assessment.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Copyright The Info-Tech Research Group Inc. All Rights Reserved. D1-1 by James M. Dutcher Strategic IT Planning & Governance Creation H I G H.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Strategic Planning 1.State Comprehensive Plan , FS A.Education – 15 policies B.K-12 – 18 policies C.Postsecondary – 12 policies D.Career Ed. –
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
P-16 Councils from 30,000 Feet: What Do They Do? Why Are They Needed? Charles S. Lenth State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) ECS National Forum.
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
AB 86: Adult Education Consortia Planning Webinar Series
Southern Regional Education Board WELCOME Strategy Work Session For What Should the Tech Center of the Future Look Like? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Missouri Higher Education Issues and Initiatives 2013.
Student Success Task Force. 1.Increase college and career readiness 2.Strengthen support for entering students 3.Incentivize successful student behaviors.
The Context for Outcomes Assessment – Industrial Age or Information Age Education? Presented to: Community College of Rhode Island Learning Evidence Team.
Midland County Career & College Access Network HHSC March 2014.
1 Accountability in P-16 Systems & Database Issues: Florida Perspective August 13, 2004 Jay Pfeiffer, Director K20 Education Information and Accountability.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Tennessee Board of Regents Developmental Studies Redesign Project ECS Annual Forum July 2007.
Data & Accountability DPI Career & Technical Education.
Louisiana Community & Technical College System Changing Lives, Creating Futures Louisiana’s Community and Technical Colleges Joe D. May President.
Marin Promise Partnership Networks 4 year olds enrolled in preschool Preschool attendance KOF assessment California Standards Test English Language Arts.
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
System Office Performance Management
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1 University of North Florida Jacksonville, Florida July 22, 2004 Steve Uhlfelder, Chair 1 Florida Board of Governors Performance & Accountability Committee.
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Working Together.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Senate Bill 909 The Oregon Education Investment Board Dollars (Trillions) House Interim Committee on Education September 22, 2011 Tim Nesbitt, Oregon Education.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
TENNESSEE SUCCEEDS.. In the spring of 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released an education report card for all states. Tennessee received an “F” in.
Terminology Standards (TS) Certification Project Overview.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Glendale College Our Great Mission System Report Access Success Budget Workforce.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board THECB 10/2013.
Texas Association of Community Colleges
Post-secondary Success for All: Increasing Awareness, Aspiration, Opportunity and Attainment A Vision for Redesigning Grades 11, 12, 13 and 14 in Minnesota.
Demystifying Dual Credit and Articulation
kctcs action plan.
The CCPS Strategic Plan
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Current Issues in Education
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Florida Board of Education Strategic Planning Workshop 3: Global Trends in Education and Strategic Imperative Form December 13, 2001

Agenda Where We Are in the Planning Process Summary of Global Education Trends Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Next Steps © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Agenda Where We Are in the Planning Process Summary of Global Education Trends Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Next Steps © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Where We Are in the Planning Process As it moves to specify its strategic imperatives, the Florida Board of Education (BOE) is examining global education trends and major challenges for Florida’s education system. Phases of Strategic Planning for Florida’s K-20 Education System Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Organization Strategic Context Assessment Strategic Imperatives Development Objectives and Projects Development Implementation Roadmap Definition Current Situation Diagnostic Define Governance Structure Formulate Marketing/ Communications Plan Establish Timeframes and Resources Delineate Roles Define Terminology Profile the Global Environment Identify Best Practices Assess Current Situation Identify Potential “Fast Track” Initiatives Confirm Guiding Principles and Mission Define Strategic Imperatives Set Measurable Goals Identify, Screen, and Prioritize Projects Perform Detailed Assessment of High Priority Projects Document Strategic Roadmap, Including Sequencing, Phasing, and Operational Recommendations Define Key Milestones Determine Project Governance and Reporting Structure Strategic Context Assessment Profile the Global Environment (National Comparisons) Student Achievement Student performance and annual learning gains according to national and international measures Graduation or completion rates at all learning levels Other? Articulation and Access Percentage of students demonstrating readiness for the educational level they are entering, from kindergarten through postsecondary education and into the workforce Number and percentage of students needing remediation at all learning levels Percentage of citizens (or residents) who complete associate, baccalaureate, professional, and postgraduate degrees Skilled Workforce Number and percentage of graduates employed in their areas of preparation Percentage of citizens (or residents) with high school diplomas and postsecondary education credentials Percentage of business and community members who find Florida's graduates possess the skills they need Economic Development Growth in new jobs by sector from 1990 through latest year for which data are available Growth in state (and Florida county, if available) GDP from 1990 through latest year for which data are available Quality, Efficient Education Services Cost per completer or graduate Average cost per non-completer at each educational level Average federal revenue received per elementary/secondary student Identify Best Practices (National and International Examples, If Applicable) Current Situation Diagnostic Assess Current Situation (National Comparisons) Highest Student Achievement Student Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) performance and annual learning gains Number and percentage of schools that improve at least one school performance grade designation or maintain a school performance grade designation of "A" pursuant to s. 229.57 Measures analogous to FCAT for community college, university, and workforce training delivery channels? Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Number and percentage of students needing remediation Percentage of Floridians who complete associate, baccalaureate, professional, and postgraduate degrees Number and percentage of credits that articulate Extent to which each set of exit-point requirements matches the next set of entrance-point requirements Skilled Workforce and Economic Development Percentage of Floridians with high school diplomas and postsecondary education credentials Quality, Efficient Services Cost disparity across institutions offering the same degrees Percentage of education customers at each educational level who are satisfied with the education provided Identify Potential “Fast Track” Initiatives Define Strategic Imperatives (That Address Issues Emerging From Strategic Context and Current Situation) Highest Student Achievement (Potential Imperatives Proposed by FBOE Members on 20 November) Reduce K-12 Dropout Rate (Proctor) Create a Highly Skilled Human Resource Pool (Eads) Close the Achievement Gap Between Inner-City Students and All Others (Fair) Increase Graduation Rate for High School and University (Particularly Among Minorities) (Johnson) Create Teaching as a Real Profession (“Get Teaching Right, Student Achievement Will Follow”) (Handy) Increase Graduation Rate by 100% in 5 Years (Garcia) Reduce Teacher Turnover/ Increase Teacher Retention by 100% in 5 Years (Garcia) Reduce Class Size (Student / Faculty Ratio) (Roberts) Improve College Readiness Rate (Proctor) Expand the Use of Technology in Teaching, Learning, and Administrative Processes (Eads) Develop Funding Formulas Aligned to Need and Values (Fair) Increase Student Achievement on Standardized Tests (Johnson) Increase High School Graduates Enrolling in Higher Education by 100% Over Next 5 Years (Garcia) TBD Timeframes: Oct. – Nov. Nov. – Jan. Dec. – Feb. Feb. – Apr. Mar. – May © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001

Near-Term Strategic Planning Schedule Where We Are in the Planning Process The Board’s goal is to complete the definition of its strategic imperatives for hand-off to the Secretary of Education in February 2002. Near-Term Strategic Planning Schedule Event Agenda December 13 Florida BOE Workshop Tallahassee Summary of Global Education Trends Further Discussion of Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives January 17 Florida BOE Workshop Pensacola Analysis of Florida’s Main Education Challenges Selection of Finalist Strategic Imperatives January 31 Delivery to Florida BOE Members of Draft Report on Recommended Strategic Imperatives February ? Florida BOE Meeting Formal Adoption of Strategic Imperatives Strategic Context Assessment Profile the Global Environment (National Comparisons) Student Achievement Student performance and annual learning gains according to national and international measures Graduation or completion rates at all learning levels Other? Articulation and Access Percentage of students demonstrating readiness for the educational level they are entering, from kindergarten through postsecondary education and into the workforce Number and percentage of students needing remediation at all learning levels Percentage of citizens (or residents) who complete associate, baccalaureate, professional, and postgraduate degrees Skilled Workforce Number and percentage of graduates employed in their areas of preparation Percentage of citizens (or residents) with high school diplomas and postsecondary education credentials Percentage of business and community members who find Florida's graduates possess the skills they need Economic Development Growth in new jobs by sector from 1990 through latest year for which data are available Growth in state (and Florida county, if available) GDP from 1990 through latest year for which data are available Quality, Efficient Education Services Cost per completer or graduate Average cost per non-completer at each educational level Average federal revenue received per elementary/secondary student Identify Best Practices (National and International Examples, If Applicable) Current Situation Diagnostic Assess Current Situation (National Comparisons) Highest Student Achievement Student Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) performance and annual learning gains Number and percentage of schools that improve at least one school performance grade designation or maintain a school performance grade designation of "A" pursuant to s. 229.57 Measures analogous to FCAT for community college, university, and workforce training delivery channels? Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Number and percentage of students needing remediation Percentage of Floridians who complete associate, baccalaureate, professional, and postgraduate degrees Number and percentage of credits that articulate Extent to which each set of exit-point requirements matches the next set of entrance-point requirements Skilled Workforce and Economic Development Percentage of Floridians with high school diplomas and postsecondary education credentials Quality, Efficient Services Cost disparity across institutions offering the same degrees Percentage of education customers at each educational level who are satisfied with the education provided Identify Potential “Fast Track” Initiatives Define Strategic Imperatives (That Address Issues Emerging From Strategic Context and Current Situation) Highest Student Achievement (Potential Imperatives Proposed by FBOE Members on 20 November) Reduce K-12 Dropout Rate (Proctor) Create a Highly Skilled Human Resource Pool (Eads) Close the Achievement Gap Between Inner-City Students and All Others (Fair) Increase Graduation Rate for High School and University (Particularly Among Minorities) (Johnson) Create Teaching as a Real Profession (“Get Teaching Right, Student Achievement Will Follow”) (Handy) Increase Graduation Rate by 100% in 5 Years (Garcia) Reduce Teacher Turnover/ Increase Teacher Retention by 100% in 5 Years (Garcia) Reduce Class Size (Student / Faculty Ratio) (Roberts) Improve College Readiness Rate (Proctor) Expand the Use of Technology in Teaching, Learning, and Administrative Processes (Eads) Develop Funding Formulas Aligned to Need and Values (Fair) Increase Student Achievement on Standardized Tests (Johnson) Increase High School Graduates Enrolling in Higher Education by 100% Over Next 5 Years (Garcia) TBD © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001

Agenda Where We Are in the Planning Process Summary of Global Education Trends Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Next Steps © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Presentation by Russ Meekins Summary of Global Education Trends Presentation by Russ Meekins © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Agenda Where We Are in the Planning Process Summary of Global Education Trends Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Next Steps © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Approved Organization and Scope of Florida BOE’s Strategic Plan Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives In Ocala, the Board approved a focused but flexible outline for its strategic plan and began experimenting with the composition of strategic imperatives. Approved Organization and Scope of Florida BOE’s Strategic Plan Component/ Sub-Component(s) Amount Of Detail Proposed Number To Be Included In Strategic Plan Guiding Principles* Minimal 5 Core Values Minimal 8 Mission* Minimal 1 Goals* Minimal 4 Strategic Imperatives Moderate to Minimal 4 to 7 Objectives Substantial to Moderate 16 to 30 Projects Substantial 30 to 60 *Provided by the Florida State Legislature. © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Hierarchy of Selected Strategic Plan Components Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives BOE’s strategic imperatives are intended to elaborate on the goals for Florida’s education system established by law, but not to be detailed prescriptions for management. Hierarchy of Selected Strategic Plan Components Definition Created And Monitored By: 40,000 Feet Goal A measurable result that the public education system is required to achieve as part of carrying out its mission Florida State Legislature and Governor Bush Strategic Imperative A top-priority initiative to be completed within two to five years as a key part of achieving one of the education system’s strategic goals Florida Board of Education 30,000 Feet Objective A major milestone that the K-20 education system’s management must pass on the way to implementing a strategic imperative Secretary and Commissioner of Education (Under the Aegis of Florida Board of Education) 10,000 Feet Project A discrete, budgeted management effort undertaken to attain one or more defined objectives Secretary and Commissioner of Education (Under the Aegis of Florida Board of Education) Ground Level © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Strategic Imperative #1 Strategic Imperative #2 Unspecified Timeframe Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives In developing its strategic imperatives, it will be important for the Board to focus on what needs to be achieved and refrain from specifying how to achieve it. What To Achieve What To Give Priority Objective #1 Objective #2 Project How Far To Go How To Do It CONCEPTUAL Strategic Imperative #1 Strategic Goal Strategic Imperative #2 © Accenture 2001 Unspecified Timeframe 2 to 5 Year Timeframe 1 to 2 Year Timeframe Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001

Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Each strategic imperative should be a major initiative (or sub-goal) supporting a strategic goal that will take two to five years to accomplish. Established By Law Developed By Florida BOE Defined By Secretary And Commissioner Of Education And Approved By Florida BOE CONCEPTUAL Project Objective #1 Objective #2 Strategic Imperative #1 Strategic Goal Strategic Imperative #2 © Accenture 2001 Unspecified Timeframe 2 to 5 Year Timeframe 1 to 2 Year Timeframe Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001

Strategic Imperatives Management Objectives And Projects Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Each strategic imperative should indicate a BOE priority vis-à-vis achieving one or more strategic goals and provide a high-level definition of success. Strategic Goal Strategic Imperatives Management Objectives And Projects Design and Implement New Recruiting Programs That Target Undersubscribed Teaching Fields ILLUSTRATIVE Reduce Frequency of “Teaching Out of Field” by 50% Statewide Design and Implement New Incentives for Teachers to Earn Extra Certifications in Undersubscribed Fields Improve Quality of Instruction So That Student Attainment Exceeds [Sunshine State Standards] Project Highest Student Achievement Project Objective #2 Project Strategic Imperative #2 Etc. Unspecified Timeframe 2 to 5 Year Timeframe 1 to 2 Year Timeframe © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001

Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives While draft imperatives proposed by BOE members have good focus, many indicate potential management objectives and projects, which goes too far at this time. Draft Strategic Imperatives Proposed in Support of the Goal of “Highest Student Achievement” Reduce K-12 Dropout Rate Create a Highly Skilled Human Resource Pool Close the Achievement Gap Between Inner-City Students and All Others Increase Graduation Rate for High School and University (Particularly Among Minorities) Create Teaching as a Real Profession (“Get Teaching Right, Student Achievement Will Follow”) Increase Graduation Rate by 100% in 5 Years Reduce Teacher Turnover / Increase Teacher Retention by 100% in 5 Years Reduce Class Size (Student / Instructor Ratio) Improve College Readiness Rate Expand Use of Technology in Teaching, Learning, and Administrative Processes Develop Funding Formulas Aligned to Need and Values Increase Student Achievement on Standardized Tests Increase High School Graduates Enrolling in Higher Education by 100% Over Next 5 Years © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Unspecified Timeframe Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives We recommend BOE’s strategic imperatives focus on outcomes that are highly likely to help cause attainment of a strategic goal, not just result from such attainment. ILLUSTRATIVE What To Achieve What To Give Priority How Far To Go How To Do It Highest Student Achievement Create Teaching as a Real Profession Reduce Teacher Turnover / Increase Teacher Retention by 100% in 5 Years Reduce K-12 Dropout Rate Increase Graduation Rate for High School and University (Particularly Among Minorities) Increase Graduation Rate by 100% in 5 Years Improve College Readiness Rate Reduce Class Size (Student / Instructor Ratio) Develop Funding Formulas Aligned to Need and Values Close the Achievement Gap Between Inner-City Students and All Others Expand Use of Technology in Teaching, Learning, and Administrative Processes Increase Student Achievement on Standardized Tests Increase High School Graduates Enrolling in Higher Education by 100% Over Next 5 Years Create a Highly Skilled Human Resource Pool Unspecified Timeframe 2 to 5 Year Timeframe 1 to 2 Year Timeframe © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001

Working Student Achievement Model Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Identification of such imperatives will require research-based causal models for each strategic goal, which we are developing for next month’s BOE workshop. Working Student Achievement Model CONCEPTUAL Recruitment and Retention of Enough Competent Instructors Certification and Ongoing Training of Instructors Mastery of Basic Skills Required at Start of Each Educational Level Early Identification and Remediation of Major Obstacles to Student Learning High-Quality Instruction Readiness to Learn High Student Achievement For Instructors For Students + Critical Success Factors Desired Outcomes © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3 © Accenture 2001 13

Agenda Where We Are in the Planning Process Summary of Global Education Trends Proposed Form of Strategic Imperatives Next Steps © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Strategic Goals of Florida’s K-20 Education System Next Steps Given the breadth and diverse needs of the education system’s customer population, the Governor and Legislature have called for a focus on four strategic goals. Strategic Goals of Florida’s K-20 Education System Progress To Be Measured By: Highest Student Achievement Student FCAT performance and annual learning gains Number and percentage of schools that improve at least one school performance grade designation or maintain a school performance grade designation of "A" pursuant to s. 229.57 Graduation or completion rates at all learning levels Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Percentage of students who demonstrate readiness for the educational level they are entering, from kindergarten through postsecondary education and into the workforce Number and percentage of students needing remediation Percentage of Floridians who complete associate, baccalaureate, professional, and postgraduate degrees Number and percentage of credits that articulate Extent to which each set of exit-point requirements matches the next set of entrance-point requirements Skilled Workforce and Economic Development Number and percentage of graduates employed in their areas of preparation Percentage of Floridians with high school diplomas and postsecondary education credentials Percentage of business and community members who find Florida's graduates possess the skills they need Quality, Efficient Services Cost per completer or graduate Average cost per non-completer at each educational level Cost disparity across institutions offering the same degrees Percentage of education customers at each educational level who are satisfied with the education provided Source: SB 1162, Section 9 © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3

Strategic Imperative Development Framework Next Steps Next month, we propose to help articulate BOE’s priorities and visions of success in relation to each strategic goal for Florida’s K-20 education system. Strategic Imperative Development Framework Goal Priorities Definition of Success in Two to Five Years Highest Student Achievement High-Quality Instruction Student Readiness to Learn Other? Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Skilled Workforce and Economic Development Quality, Efficient Services © Accenture 2001 Florida Board of Education/ Strategic Planning Workshop 3