ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Supreme Court of Albania 1 The Presentation of Albania.
Advertisements

Performance Framework Part 2 – Performance and Resource Management Multi Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support in Serbia.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Presentation of the Work Programme for the year 2008 Dušan Petrović, Minister of Justice Ministry of Justice December.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
Case of Serbia: Relations between EU integration process and judiciry reform Dušan Brajković Between Transformation and Integration – South-East Europe’s.
“MEZAN” Case Management Program At Palestinian Courts.
The « Mizan » Program The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Justice 6 DEC 2014.
LOGO MIRJANA SEKULOVSKA, PhD, DEPUTY MINISTER OF INFORMATION SOCIETY Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Information Society.
REFORM DIRECTIONS IN SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM MINISTRY FOR LABOR, EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL POLICY June 2006.
Subregional Capacity-Building Seminar on the Commercialization and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Skopje, FYR Macedonia, 1-3 April 2009 Prepared.
Faye Business Systems Group presents: The Top 10 Reasons Why CRM Implementations Fail.
ICT business statistics and ICT sector: Uzbekistan’s experience Prepared by Mukhsina Khusanova.
Dublinbureau Nederland REFORM OF JUDICIARY in Republic of Croatia.
Programming of International Development Assistance Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Interior September 17, 2007.
ANTI-CORRUPTION INSTITUTIONS AND MEDIA IN ALBANIA.
Ahmed Sitti Fatouma Chargée de la Coordination de l’Aide Commissariat Général au Plan The current Aid coordination System UNION DES COMORES UNITÉ – DÉVELOPPEMENT-
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia 22-26, Nemanjina Street Belgrade
Republic of Serbia Ministry of Foreign Affairs “Support to MFA in Implementation of Schengen Best Consular Practice”
DIGITAL EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT: LAW, THEORY AND PRACTICE 2-3 April 2004 University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law.
Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia Implementation of the third pillar of the Aarhus Convention - Access to.
NATIONAL JUDICIARY INFORMATICS SYSTEM GENERAL INFORMATION U Y A P Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice.
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Reform of the Judicial System in the Republic of Macedonia Warsaw, June 2005.
MODEL COURT GUIDELINE FOR THE BASIC AND HIGHER COURTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA.
Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on statistics Meshimbayeva Anar, Chairperson of Statistical Agency, Kazakhstan How data can be instrumental in democratic.
PROGRAMMING OF INTERNATIOAL ASSISTANCE Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Justice 25 th September, 2007.
Documents for everyone and Justice for all FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE JUSTICE Monique Beuken, Commission for the Modernisation of the Judiciary (CMOJ) Phedra.
0 USAID/MMC Program Funded in Paraguay Challenges IT Strategic Plan Fundamentals Open Source Software From E-Government to Government Transformation.
Monitoring of Judicial Reform Citizens’ view of the judicial system in Montenegro March 2016 Telephone survey The project "Monitoring of Judicial Reform"
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial Control Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 15 – Energy – Upstream Hydrocarbons.
United Nations Development Fund for Women Labor Rights and Employment *Overview of activities*
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 1 – Free movement of goods Bilateral.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
Electronic Case Management System – Georgian Experience Dr. Kontantine Kublashvili.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
Ministry of Justice Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Ministry of Justice Sweden Government Offices of Sweden CEAS, a judicial reality or actual practice?
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 3 - Freedom to Provide Services Bilateral.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 19 – Social Policy and Employment.
Treasury of the Republic of Kazakhstan
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Bosnia & Herzegovina Statistical Training
ECLI IN ROMANIA BO-ECLI Conference Athens, /06/2017
Implementation of ECLI in Latvia
Recap of the First Day of
PHASE 3 – PROSECUTION AND COURTS TRAINING
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
First meeting 28 September 2006 Council of Ministers
MDTFJSS RESULTS IN 2016 Ministry of Justice.
Program of MODERN ENTERPRISES DEVELOPING SME’s IT SKILLS
Ministry of Health Montenegro ERASMUS+ KA2 PROJECT:
CEPEJ IN TURKEY Ismail Aksel CEPEJ Member of Turkey
1 Background Public Sector Accounting and Reporting Reforms in the Republic of Croatia began in 2002 when the Modified Accrual Accounting Principle and.
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Justice
Content Republic of Serbia Ministry of Justice ICT infrastructure
Study Visit to Norwegian Judiciary
The European Anti-Corruption Report
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS KEEPING AND MANAGEMENT
CMIS - THE NECESSARY BUILDING STEPS Director General of NCA,
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PUBLIC PROCUREMENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Data collection and President's Dashboards
Presentation transcript:

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF MONTENEGRO

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY The Judicial Information System (PRIS) is a unique system of all courts and the Institute for the Execution of Criminal Sanctions. This system began with the development of the late 1990s, and its full implementation, in all courts, was carried out in 2009. The application of the PRIS, which is still in use, was introduced for the first time in 2000, and it was implemented at the level of all judicial institutions in 2009. This application is made in Oracle Forms and Reports technology, which is considered an outdated technology, full of security vulnerabilities, and besides, all the information systems that are therein have problems with system response speed and user speed, because it is not optimally optimized. Because of lack of funds, this application is still in use.

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY From 2009 to 2011, there was no activity on the modernization of PRIS PRIS were used exclusively by courts but insufficiently Montenegro brings the ICT Strategy of the Judiciary 2011-2014 With the support of USAID and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Norway, through IMG, Montenegro approaches the implementation of the Strategy

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY Due to unresolved ownership relations over the source code of PRIS originally developed by a private company, the Judicial Council takes over the management and development of the ICT system for the courts Thus, the Judicial Council has established the Department of ICT, which currently has 19 employees

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY PRIS is actually predicted as: system for registration of cases, case management system, and system for statistical reporting However, although all aspects are possible, today only the registration of cases and some statistical reporting are applied The reasons for this are different: from the lack of funds for system modernization, unresolved ownership relations over the system, and incomplete technical documentation of the system

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY After the implementation of the Strategy for ICT from 2011-2014, the number of beneficiaries has significantly increased , as well as the quality of data in PRIS, this was actually just the beginning of the introduction of ICT into the judiciary. Implementation of this Strategy made progress: all cases in the judiciary are entered into the system, the decisions are integral part of the system, the hearings are scheduled through the system, the functionality of automatic creation of templates for clients is enabled, the PRIS is connected with other systems

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY In the period 2014-2016, there were no significant investments in the system as there was no donor support. Finally, in negotiations with the European Union, Montenegro has recognized the importance of the information system in the judiciary, declared a system of importance to the state, and paved the way for the adoption of the Strategy for ICT in the judiciary for 2016-2020

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY This Strategy provides a unique ICT system for the judiciary: courts, prosecutors' offices, the Ministry of Justice and the Institute for the execution of criminal sanctions At the moment, the Ministry of Justice managed the preparation of technical documentation for the announcement of tenders for new software solutions for all users. In order to avoid problems from the past, the Ministry of Justice has been entrusted with the management of the new system.

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY However, the only way to manage development, improve the system for each user is not clearly defined by the Strategy, so in the near future we will see whether it will bring new problems or the final solution

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY The expectations of the ICT Justice Strategy are huge. In addition to existing functionalities, the new system will provide new ones that will enable judges and court presidents various facilities for case handling and court management.

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY First of all, the functionality of case management, not only as through the registration of cases, but also the measurement of the length of the procedure both in phases and total. Furthermore, we expect better and accurate statistics of cases at all levels, but also the development of a paperless courts.

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY In time to come, we have to do a serious jobs: the involvement of courts for misdemeanors in PRIS, the reorganization of courts network within the Judicial Reform Strategy, the fulfillment of the measures prescribed by the Action Plan for Chapter 23 The problems we face are numerous - from lack of resources to insufficient staff

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY However, the Judicial Council is very committed to the implementation of the Strategy for ICT in the judiciary Despite the problems that we face daily, The Judicial Council is committed to achieving the principles of modern democracy - an independent and efficient judiciary

ICT IN MONTENEGRIN JUDICIARY Thank you on your attention. miroslava.raicevic@sudstvo.me zeljka.jovovic@sudstvo.me