Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI)
Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 6: Juvenile Offenders in.
Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
Strengthening Probation as the Sanction of Choice In order for Probation to be a meaningful sanction, it must be adequately funded. Probation is the sanction.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
November 3 1.What is an action committed by a juvenile called that would be considered a crime if committed by an adult? a. intake b. truancy c. status.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 7: Juvenile Offenders in.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Give Your Assessment of the philosophy behind your state’s approach to Judicial Waiver “To provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation.
Understanding the “System”
PRESENTED BY: LORI ALBIN, DIRECTOR FISCAL POLICY CENTER NATIONAL JUVENILE JUSTICE NETWORK How Much Does it Cost to Put Johnny in Jail?
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Public Meetings on the Proposed Female Detention Center
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
Georgia and the American Experience
Lori Albin, Director Fiscal Policy Center National Juvenile Justice Network July 2011 Show Us the Money: Calculating the Cost of Juvenile Justice.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.
VOCABULARY. ADJUDICATE  TO HEAR AND SETTLE A CASE BY JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn.
\. 2 Expediting Court Process As bureaucracies advance red-tape bureaucratization tends to develop Opportunities to expedite can occur at various points.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 15: Government of the Empire State Section 3 Judicial Branch ©2005 Clairmont Press.
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
Juvenile Justice System: Detention
Race and the Relationship to Juvenile Adjudication
Lesson 6: Juvenile Justice (Chapter 15 Section 4)
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Racial injustice in the criminal justice system
Juvenile Justice in Georgia
Juvenile Justice system
Dependency Court Flowchart
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
Overview of the Juvenile Justice System
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
LESSON OBJECTIVES Unit 4-3: Adjudication in Juvenile Court
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Raise the Age Implementation
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
CHAPTER 1 Juvenile Justice: Definitions, Measurements and Process
Presentation transcript:

Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2016

Baltimore City Juvenile Complaints Have Declined Significantly Baltimore City complaints referred to DJS Intake declined 73.2% in ten years. Statewide complaints declined 56.1% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Juvenile Complaints in Baltimore City Have Declined for All Race/Ethnicities Since FY07 Complaints for Baltimore City African American youth declined 73.4%, and declined 72.7% for white youth. African American youth comprise 94% of complaints which is similar to FY07. African American youth comprise 72% of the general population. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake in fiscal year. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Proportion of Baltimore City Complaints Referred to Court Increased 73.8% of Baltimore City complaints were referred to court by DJS Intake in FY15, 4.7% more than in FY07. Statewide 48.4% were referred to court. 7.8% of Baltimore City complaints were diverted to an informal DJS pre-court case. Statewide 15.7% were diverted. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Baltimore City Detention Population Has Declined Significantly Baltimore City daily population in DJS detention declined 40.7% in ten years, to 97.8 in FY16. The statewide detention population declined 39.1% over the same period. Cases detained for the Adult Court now make up 44.9% of the DJS detained population in Baltimore City. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, detention admissions for Baltimore City youth. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Baltimore City Youth Population In Detention Pre-Disposition Has Declined Significantly The Baltimore City juvenile pre-dispositional detained population declined 62.4% in ten years to 36.8 youth in FY 2016. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Baltimore City’s Pre-Disposition Detention Placements Have Decreased for Most Complaint Types Youth detained pending disposition for misdemeanors has decreased 48% over ten years. Youth detained pending disposition for crimes of violence has decreased 3% over ten years.

Crimes of Violence Make Up an Increasing Proportion of Detention Placement Offenses The proportion of youth detained pre-disposition for Crimes of Violence complaints has increased 14 percentage points over ten years. The detained population is increasingly comprised of youth with violent crimes complaints.

Detention Placements for Non-Violent Felonies are Declining The proportion of youth detained pre-disposition for Non-Violent Felony complaints has decreased 12 percentage points over ten years. The detained population is increasingly comprised of youth with violent crimes complaints.

Baltimore City’s Pre-D Detention Population

Baltimore City Youth In Detention Pending a Committed Placement Has Declined Dramatically Juvenile court pending placement population declined 74.4% in ten years to 17.1 youth in FY 2016. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Juvenile Probation and Commitment Orders Have Declined Baltimore City Juvenile probation orders declined 64.2% in ten years. Statewide probation orders declined 49.7% over the same period. Baltimore City juvenile commitments declined 48.3% in ten years. Statewide commitments declined 48.5% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Average Committed Out of Home Population Has Declined Significantly in Baltimore City The overall daily population of Baltimore City youth committed by the juvenile court to out of home placement declined 51.5% over ten years, from 186.0 in FY07 to 104.3 in FY16. Statewide average committed population declined 43.6% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed program admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Baltimore City’s Committed Youth Population Has Decreased for All Facility Types Overall committed out-of-home population has declined 51.5% since FY06, and by over 57.4% since the high of 244 in FY11. DJS-Operated ADP decreased 41.5%, and Private In-State has declined 45.2% since FY07. Out of State committed average population declined from the high of 58 youth in FY11, to just 15 in FY16. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, average population of committed facilities. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Low-Level Offenses Has Declined The proportion of new commitments for misdemeanor and other low-level offenses declined over ten years. The proportion of new commitments for violations of probation has decreased significantly in the last year.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence has Increased in Baltimore City Crimes of Violence made up nearly a third (32%) of new commitments in FY 2016. The rate of juveniles committed for Non-Violent Felonies has slightly increased over the past two years.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence has Increased in Baltimore City Crimes of Violence made up nearly a third (32%) of new commitments in FY 2016.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Non-Violent Felonies has Increased in Baltimore City

Recidivism Rates for Baltimore City DJS Committed Youth Have Remained Relatively Flat in Recent Years 26.2% of Baltimore City youth released from committed placement in FY15 had a new offense within a year that resulted in a delinquent adjudication or criminal conviction, a slight decrease of 1.4 points from FY14. The Statewide rate was 16.7% in FY15, down 4.1 points from FY14. Data Source: DJS Data Resource Guide FY2015. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions

Recidivism Rates for Baltimore City DJS Probation Youth Have Declined Significantly in The Past Year 19.5% of Baltimore City youth placed on probation for the first time in FY15 had a new offense within a year that resulted in a delinquent adjudication or criminal conviction, a decrease of 7.7 points from FY14. The Statewide rate was 17.6% in FY15, down 1.4 points from FY14. Data Source: DJS Data Resource Guide FY2015. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions