Scott Downey Director of Compliance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blogging at Memorial University Libraries The what, the why, the how, the who.
Advertisements

Revised Event Analysis Process Event Analysis Subcommittee (EAS) Process Update Team (EUT) Hassan Hamdar – FRCC Reliability Engineer, EAS Vice-Chair FRCC.
ProcessIt Document Library 8.0 Controlled Documents Suite.
Notice of Compliance Audit
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Introduction Peak Hosted Advanced Applications. 2 What is this project all about? Enhanced TOP situational awareness and ability to perform real-time.
Joe Mercer Operations Planning Engineer III Operation Planning Analysis PHAAUG Meeting Mar 12 th, 2015.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
1 P25 Compliance Assessment Program Update TIA TR-8 & P25 Steering Committee February 2015 John Merrill Deputy Director, Office for Interoperability and.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Enterprise Data Warehouse Section 8 – Performance Monitoring.
1 Options Clearing Corporation Encore Data Distribution Services April 22, 2004.
Mastering the AUPHA Network Kristi Donovan, MS, CAE Senior Director, Professional Affairs 2012 AUPHA Annual Meeting June 2, 2012.
CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach Stacen Tyskiewicz WECC CIIMS Chair March 22, 2016.
Compliance Management System. Intelex System Overview Focus Modules: –Permits Management –Monitoring & Measurement –Training Management –Document Control.
Portals and CRM: what, When, Why, and How
The Performance and Staff Development Program
EIFL Licensing Training 2: EIFL LICENCE AGREEMENTS
Communications Report and Plan Review Monday, September 26, 2016.
NERC Published Lessons Learned
NERC Published Lessons Learned
Applying for a Cultural Grant
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Timeline to drive the Vision
Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair October 18, 2016
COM Operating Personnel Communications Protocols
Developments in Standards of GRAP 12 July 2016
CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach
The International Plant Protection Convention
Partnership Forum 2017 Partner Institution Survey 2016 :
Steven Garrett. October 26, 2012
Chapter 6: Community Features.
Training for New District Test Coordinators
CME Software Review: Real Life Experiences
Department of Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour
Welcome to our first session!
Vendor Management and Software Asset Management
The IAASB’s Future Strategy
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
HRA User Satisfaction Report
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
PAN Forum June 27, 2014 ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV
Sam Houston State University
Public Management Information Systems System Analysis & Design Tuesday, December 04, 2018 Hun Myoung Park, Ph.D. Public Management & Policy Analysis.
SEMS Monthly Training Webinar – April 24, 2014 Compliance Management Part 2a: Consumer Confidence Reporting Presented by Chuck Pugh, Director – Professional.
Academy Hub An eUnomia Factory Solution.
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
LUCAS Task Force The way forward.
Strategic Planning Process
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
Knowledge Base.
Strategic Planning Process
WISP Follow on Reporting.
NEW INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Sam Houston State University
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Peak Reliability IRO Webinar
Applied Software Project Management
Public Management Information Systems System Design Monday, July 01, 2019 Hun Myoung Park, Ph.D. Public Management & Policy Analysis Program Graduate.
REAL WORLD CASE STUDY.
Project Kick-off <Customer Name> <Project Name>
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE)
Report on TDL activities since Mts#73
LIHEAP Performance Management in the District of Columbia
EMIS Advisory Council Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Street Manager Communications approach
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Scott Downey Director of Compliance Peak Reliability RC Users Group Sharing Information May 16, 2017 Scott Downey Director of Compliance

Webinar Objectives Begin a dialogue on how Peak can improve the way we share information Provide an overview of peakrc.com and peakrc.org Describe current process for collection and maintenance of external contacts Discuss Sharing Information Survey Provide highlights of the Compliance Impact Stakeholder Engagement Plan

Peakrc.com Peakrc.com - PUBLIC Board and Governance Materials Universal Data Sharing Agreement Procedures/processes – Public Classification Comment forum for documentation under development/revision News and Event Announcements Career Postings

Peakrc.com

Peakrc.org

Peakrc.org Peakrc.org - SECURE

Peakrc.org Peakrc.org - SECURE Real-time displays Real-time Contingency Analysis (RTCA) Study libraries Modeling Data Procedures/processes – Non-Public classification BA/TOP Data Requests Currently no access for non-UDSA signatories (DP-TO-GO-GOP)

Sharing Information – Delivery Issues Current software used for storing external contacts inefficient and inflexible Failed deliveries due to: Contact information out of date Entity firewall blocks communication from Peak

Sharing Information – Issues No defined process or central repository for new contact subscription No defined process for contacts to update their information No mechanism in place to validate contact list First steps Peak beginning list clean up New database software

Sharing Information Survey Objectives: Better understand how stakeholders want to receive and/or access information Gain insight on best practices for contact list management Survey will be 3-6 questions Targeted for distribution June 12 Sent to compliance contacts Entity input required for maximum understanding and insight

Sharing Information Survey Sample Questions: Are you satisfied with the current mechanism of separation for public vs secure materials (.com vs .org)? Should sections of .org be accessible to non-UDSA signatories in order to improve the way secure documentation is accessed? If yes, what type of documentation would qualify?

Sharing Information Survey Should each Member Class representative or entity provide a point of contact responsible to update Peak when contacts change? How often should the contact list be updated? Would your organization be willing to subscribe to email distribution lists?

Compliance Impact Stakeholder Engagement Plan Developing Compliance Impact Stakeholder Engagement Plan Process to assess and identify compliance impacts (internal/external) resulting from development or revision of Peak documentation Engagement process Collaborative Transparent Comment periods

Scott Downey sdowney@peakrc.com 360.213.2314