Classification and diagnosis of schizophrenia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A / AS Psychology.. Key Studies
Advertisements

Abnormal Psychology Discuss to what extent biological, cognitive, and sociocultural factors influence abnormal behaviour Evaluate psychological research.
Context  How do we define sane? How about insane? Is there a difference? How do we tell?
Devise at least 5 (no more than 10) questions on the Rosenhan study. Try to make them challenging – some ideas: They will mainly be knowledge based, but.
How to understand a research article Behavioral Research.
The Individual Differences Approach
Chapter 8 Psychopathology
Discuss the validity and reliability of diagnosis
Discuss validity and reliability of diagnosis
DSM- IV The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (Edition 4), was last published in The DSM is produced by the American Psychiatric.
Module 47 Mr. Ng Abnormal Psychology Unit 13. Psychological Disorders Psychological Disorders: persistently harmful thoughts, feelings, and actions. Behavior.
DEFINING “ABNORMALITY” OR CONSTRUCTING PSYCHOPATHOLOGY?: LECTURE OUTLINE Some warnings about “abnormality” Difficulties defining abnormality Thomas Szasz.
Who’s Crazy Here, Anyway?
Ethical Issues Involved in Assessment & Clinical Diagnosis.
Defining Abnormality and Diagnosing Psychological Disorders.
Goldstein (1988) Gottesman & Shields (1966)
Classification and diagnosis of schizophrenia. There are a number of criticisms associated with the diagnosis of Schizophrenia. These involve the concepts.
‘On Being Sane in Insane Places’
Being sane in insane places
Psychopathology Introduction. ource/view.php?id=6874http://vle.ccs.northants.sch.uk/mod/res ource/view.php?id=6874.
On being sane in insane places Science
Research support for validity and reliability theories
D L ROSENHAN (1973) On being sane in insane places!
Rosenhan (1973) Sane in Insane places On being sane in insane places Science psychlotron.org.ukMark Souter.
On being sane in insane places
Who’s Crazy Here Anyway? By: D. L. Rosenhan Presented by: Amy Chicos Craig Shadden Ashley Ferin Angie Flowers Stacey Wall Jackie Jensen.
“On Being Sane in Insane Places” A study by D.L. Rosenhan 1973 “On Being Sane in Insane Places” A study by D.L. Rosenhan 1973 Christinia Stokley, Sara.
Schizophrenia Lesson Two. Specification Describe and evaluate two issues in classifying or diagnosing schizophrenia… -Reliability -Validity.
Rosenhan (1973) Sane in Insane Places. Map to Spec – Page Studies in detail Describeevaluate a) Describe and evaluate Rosenhan (1973) “On being.
DIAGNOSING PSYCHOPATHOLOGY: DSM-IV MORE HARM THAN GOOD?
Defining Abnormality and Diagnosing Psychological Disorders.
Abnormal Psychology Unit 13 Module 47 Mr. Ng.
The DSM – how valid and reliable is it as a tool for diagnosis?
The DSM – how valid and reliable is it as a tool for diagnosis?
Schizophrenia Issues of Reliability and Validity Explain the issues of reliability with classification of schizophrenia.
Context  How do we define sane? How about insane? Is there a difference? How do we tell?
BPA Jan-11 Problems of schizophrenia Classification & Diagnosis.
Abnormal Psychology Lesson objective: Discuss the validity and reliability of diagnosis.
CONTENT DEFINITIONS, DIAGNOSIS OF ABNORMALITY. EXPLANATIONS AND TREATMENTS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION (INCLUDING EVALUATION)
DO NOW Based on the article assigned as yesterday’s HW….
On Being Sane in Insane Places (1973) D.L. Roshenhan – The Psychology of Individual Differences.
Concepts & Diagnosis Paper 2 Question (Major). Sources of info… Use your textbook……… Use the wiki………. Use the summary sheets….. Use the handouts………..
The human face of schizophrenia rellist&playnext=1&list=PL0655A5F779E91DED
VALIDITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #3.
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology 4) Content Reliability of the diagnosis of mental disorders Validity of the diagnosis of mental disorders Cultural issues.
Intro to Psychological Disorders CHAPTER 16. Why are we so interested in psychological disorders? Chances are, we have all been affected by a psych disorder.
Dysfunctional Behaviour G543. –Categories: DSM and ICD –Definitions by Rosenhan & Seligman –Diagnostic bias (gender) Ford & Widiger.
Discuss the validity and reliability of diagnosis
On the side or front of your folder:
Key question in clinical psychology
On Being Sane in Insane Places
Schizophrenia.
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology
Intro to… Abnormal Psychology A.K.A. Psychological Disorders
Reliability and Validity
Relibility and validity of diagnosis
Classification of Schizophrenia Diagnosis of Schizophrenia
IB Psychology Today’s Agenda: Turn in: Abnormal Intro Cont.
Reliability in diagnosis
Consequences of being diagnosed with depression
IB Psychology Today’s Agenda: Turn in: What is Sanity? Nothing
FACTORS INFLUENCING DIAGNOSIS
Rosenhan is part of what is called ‘anti psychiatry movement’
PSYA3 Essay Planning Pack
Medical Approach Physicians began using medical models to review the physical causes of these disorders. Etiology: Cause and development of the disorder.
Classification & Diagnosis
Classification and Treatment Plans
Issues in Diagnosis and Classification
Let’s start today’s lesson by
Sz Mini mock feedback..
Presentation transcript:

Classification and diagnosis of schizophrenia

Homework: 12th November Research methods booklet 2 weeks to complete

Revision sessions Up to Christmas: After Christmas: Friday: Research methods After Christmas: Wednesday: other topics

Diagnosis and classification of SZ

Task In your groups, outline on a sheet of paper, the advantages and disadvantages of using classification systems like the ICD and DSM

Advantages of using classification systems Leads to effective treatment programmes and support which would, otherwise, not be offered Common language among practioners. Facilitates communication and research DSM incorporates a great deal of practical knowledge in a convenient and useful format. It does its job reasonably well when it is applied properly and when its limitations are understood

Problems associated with classification and diagnosis. Diagnosis might lead to labelling and stigmatisation (Scheff 1966) causing long-term problems of getting / keeping employment/relationships. Lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. The motives of the people working on DSM 5 have often been questioned. They have been accused of having a financial conflict of interest because some have (minimal) drug company ties and also because so many of the changes enhanced pharma profits by adding to an ‘already existing societal overdose of carelessly prescribed psychiatric medicine’. Criticisms of the DSM-5, such as the issue of medicalising mental wellbeing, are legitimate areas of debate. This debate is to be welcomed if doctors are to appreciate the scale of the challenges of better diagnosing, treating and caring for people with mental health conditions.

issues surrounding diagnosis There are several issues surrounding the diagnosis of Schizophrenia that need to be assessed. These include addressing issues surrounding the reliability and validity of diagnosis. Task…. What is meant by reliability What is meant by Validity Discuss in pairs the difference between the two.

RELIABILITY OF CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS Reliability refers to the consistency of a measuring instrument, such as a questionnaire or scale, to assess for example, the severity of the schizophrenic symptoms. Level of agreement on the diagnosis by different psychiatrists across time and cultures; stability of diagnosis over time given no change in symptoms Reliability of such questionnaires or scales can be measured in terms of: whether 2 independent assessors give similar diagnosis (inter-rater reliability) whether tests used to deliver these diagnoses are consistent over time (test-retest reliability)

Validity Define the following terms…. Predictive validity Descriptive validity Aetiological validity Criterion validity

Validity In relation to schizophrenia validity refers to the extent to which the classification systems are accurately diagnosing schizophrenia. Reliability – a valid diagnosis has to first be reliable, though this is no guarantee of validity. Predictive Validity – if diagnosis leads to effective treatment, the diagnosis can be seen as valid. Descriptive Validity – to be valid, patients diagnosed with different disorders should differ from each other. (e.g. The description of schizophrenia should match the symptoms shown in individuals). Aetiological Validity – to be valid, all patients with the same disorder should have the same cause. Criterion validity: - to be valid, different assessment criterions should arrive at the same diagnosis

Rosenhan: Being Sane in insane places https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8OxdGV_7lo 1960’s anti psychiatry movement https://www.livingwithschizophreniauk.org/information- sheets/the-anti-psychiatry-movement/ Psychiatric classification is unreliable Rosenhan’s 1973 study aimed to investigate the reliability of staff in psychiatric hospitals to identify the sane from the insane. He wanted to see if people who posed as mentally ill would be identified by staff in psychiatric hospitals as sane rather than insane. The participants he used had never been diagnosed with a mental illness.

Rosenhan asked eight ‘sane’ people to telephone psychiatric hospitals for urgent appointments, complaining of hearing unclear voices saying ‘thud, hollow, empty’. All eight were admitted to hospital and all but one was diagnosed with schizophrenia, the other with manic-depressive psychosis. Upon admission, all pseudo-patients stopped showing any symptoms and took part in ward activities. The average length of stay was 19 days. All participants had agreed to stay until they had convinced staff they were no longer ill. On release, the pseudo-patients were given the diagnosis of schizophrenia ‘in remission’. In a second follow up study one hospital was told that sometime over the next three months, one or more pseudo-patients would try to be admitted, and hospital staff were asked to rate the patients who presented themselves on a scale of 1-10 on the likelihood of them being a pseudo-patient. 44% were judged by at least one member of staff to be a pseudo patient. Rosenhan concluded that we cannot reliably distinguish the sane from the insane, and that hospitalisation and labelling can lead to depersonalisation, powerlessness and segregation which are counter- therapeutic.

Research into Reliability/validity of Schizophrenia Diagnosis Task Read pages 12-15, complete the activities and complete the summary box below Research into Reliability/validity of Schizophrenia Diagnosis Researchers What they did / found.......... Reliability/ Validity and WHY Cheniaux % concordance rate between..... Jakobson Rosenhan Birchwood and Iqbal

Rosenhan 1973/77 This study highlighted the unreliability of diagnosis. However, this study was conducted over 30 years ago. Since then manuals have been improved and diagnostic practise is very different. For example, categories and definitions are more detailed and operationalised and psychiatrists now use standardised interview schedules when assessing patients. Also the ICD and DSM have been bought in line with one another so they are now very similar. Rosenhan refers to mental health diagnoses as "labels" which are attached to patients. His study shows that these labels are often attached wrongly. He also claims that these labels, once attached, are very hard to change or remove.

However… Seymour Ketty (1974) criticised Rosenhan, saying that, because the pseudopatients were faking an unreal mental condition, it doesn't tell us anything about how people with genuine mental conditions are diagnosed. Kety’s point is that psychiatrist don't expect someone to carry out deception in order to be admitted to a psychiatric hospital. In other words, the study lacked ecological validity.

Discuss reliability and/or validity in relation to the diagnosis and classification of schizophrenia. (Total 8 marks) In pairs, person A: reliability. Person B: validity

Discuss reliability and/or validity in relation to the diagnosis and classification of schizophrenia. (Total 8 marks) Possible Content: Definitions of reliability in relation to diagnosis and classification – level of agreement on the diagnosis by different psychiatrists across time and cultures; stability of diagnosis over time given no change in symptoms Definitions of validity – the extent to which schizophrenia is a unique syndrome with characteristics, signs and symptoms Possible discussion points: Use of evidence on the reliability of major classification systems Use of evidence on reliability of diagnosis between different clinicians and across different cultures Range of different symptoms in different patients – positive and negative symptoms Factors affecting reliability and validity of diagnosis Wider implications of reliability and validity of diagnosis eg labelling

Extra reading Issues with diagnosing and classifying schizophrenia using the DSM/ICD https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/ds m5-in-distress/201212/dsm-5-is-guide-not-bible- ignore-its-ten-worst-changes https://www.nhs.uk/news/mental-health/news- analysis-controversial-mental-health-guide-dsm- 5/#in-defence-of-the-dsm-5

Store the research Create your own poster/method/revision activity of the research for schizophrenia *We are going to add o this every lesson