Improvement through Self-Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

Key Stage 3 National Strategy
5 th June 2008 Peer review and development Penny Silvester Divisional Manager Learning and skills.
Overview Securing School Improvement. Welcome and introduction AIM Understanding the Ofsted Inspection Framework To give some insight into how some of.
Evaluating and Measuring Impact Presented by – Date –
Head teacher Performance Management
Independent schools inspection annual conferences 2014 Bradley Simmons, National Director, Independent schools John Seal HMI, Special Advisor to Independent.
OUTSTANDING PE LESSONS Key features that contribute to an outstanding lesson and the strategies used to get consistency across the department.
PSHE education and the SEF The contribution of PSHE education to the school inspection process.
Equality and Inspection – an Ofsted perspective of Impact NATSPEC/LSIS June 2011.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
Ian Hodgkinson HMI 19 June 2015
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
Theory & Practice – the new Common Inspection Framework and what it means to governors UCU-LSIS-UNISON FE Staff Governors’ Conference 3 December 2012 Lorna.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Observation System Kidderminster College June 2012.
The role of governance in self-assessment NATSPEC conference Sue Preece HMI March
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from January 2012.
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from January 2012.
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
Bradfield CE (VA) Primary School School Development Priorities
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
AOSEC Principals’ Meeting ‘The new Ofsted inspection framework’ Paul Joyce, Her Majesty’s Inspector Deputy Director Further Education & Skills and Independent.
September 2015 Focus – OfSTED Changes and Curriculum requirements
ISC Conference Inspecting learner involvement in the new inspection framework Kath Townsley HMI Margaret Hobson HMI September 2009.
Dorset School Sport Conference School Inspection 2015 John Mitcheson HMI 25 September 2015.
What Ofsted does to reach a judgement about teaching and what can be learned from this by academies?
EYFS – and the OFSTED Framework Sue Monypenny Senior Education Standards and Effectiveness Officer.
From good to outstanding: Teaching & Learning in the new framework Dave Lewis Nov 2010.
Ofsted Expectations – 2009 Framework Nicola Pruden St John Payne School 7 th December 2010.
Buckstone Primary School School Improvement Plan Summary A copy of the full Standards and Quality Report and the full Improvement Plan are available on.
The Future of Education Inspection Overview: Key points from the new Common Inspection Framework (CIF) Highlight Ofsted new way of working Priorities.
Equality and Assessment Andy Ashley. Common Inspection Framework B- Quality of provision –B1. How effectively do teaching, training and assessment support.
Ofsted Common Inspection Framework Mapping to Career Ready September 2015.
Provider Briefing Welcome
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
IT&L Training Introduction for New Observers. Domestics Curriculum manager for improving teaching & learning Tea and.
Hertfordshire LA, Supporting schools, June 2009 ©
A Brave New World: Using the New Ofsted Framework on DWP Inspections Karen Adriaanse March 2010.
April 2016 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Preparing for Observation The New Common Inspection Framework.
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
Annual report findings 2010/11 Lorna Fitzjohn, Divisional Manager, Learning and Skills 29 November 2011.
Enterprise in the Curriculum Review Meeting 22 nd September 2010.
Raising standards, improving lives
AOSEC Teaching & Learning Fair
Bay Education Trust March 2016
OTLA Report Writing Training
The New Ofsted Framework May 2012
Self Evaluation in Partnership
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
The Hawthorns Primary School Strategic Plan
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
Sean Harford HMI National Director,
Preparing for Observation The New Common Inspection Framework
The Literacy Hub Introduction Literacy Toolkit
Super.. Great A look at OFSTED criteria for trainee achievement.
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
What Does Outstanding Learning Look Like?
Curriculum for Wales Creating the Climate for Change
Professional development
OTLA Report Writing Training
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
Assessing Pupil Progress in Science (APP) Department CPD session Spring 2009 Slide 0.1.
OTLA Report Writing Training
Presentation transcript:

Improvement through Self-Assessment 2014 - 2015 Christine Wilks 4th June 2015

(2) Welcome Outline of the session Housekeeping Introductions and experience of SAR/QIP Expectations Action planning Accessible at: Learninharrow.org.uk ACFL Template layout & presentation.

(3) Objectives Identify 2 advantages of a SAR. 2. Identify 4 sources you might tap into to complete the SAR process. An introduction to performance data and making evaluative judgements. 4. Compare Good, Bad & Ugly Ofsted reports. 5. Evaluate a sample SAR report.

(4) Common Inspection Framework CIF The Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills was devised by her Majesty’s Chief Inspector in line with the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The CIF comprises the principal criteria that inspectors must consider when inspecting every education and training provider.

(5) What is Self-assessment? A tool for improvement – how well did we do and how can we improve? Process should focus on actions which improve outcomes for learners. Led by the needs of the organisation. Judgements should be based on reliable evidence.

(6) Why self-assess & plan improvements? Improve the learning experience and the outcomes for learners. Support your organisation’s priorities and monitor progress in meeting them. Focus on the continuous task of raising quality. Critical theme for risk assessment. Essential tool for future planning.

(7) Self-assessment To be fully effective self-assessment must clearly evaluate: Where you were Where you are Where you are going

(8) Activity 1 - Group think? What sources might you tap into when carrying out self-assessment of your provision? Jot down as many as you can in 5 minutes.

(9) Advantages of the SAR process Significant aid to Ofsted compliance. Identifies strengths and weaknesses. Focuses attention on outcomes for learners. Encourages staff to buy-in (feel valued). Provides a benchmark for performance. Shapes next year’s curriculum offer.

(10) Advantages of the SAR process Stimulates the capture and use of data. Forces the application of the learner voice in curriculum planning. Concentrates attention on the impact on learners. Supports grant applications. Common ground for professional dialogue.

(11) How to identify Strengths and Areas for Improvement Eg: Proposed strength – “Every learner has an induction and learning plan.” Question: If every learner did not have an induction and learning plan would this be an area for improvement? Answer: Yes. This is a norm and not a key strength. If the opposite of whatever is claimed is an Area for Improvement …THEN…what is claimed cannot be a strength but a norm.

(12) Activity 2 - Norm or Strength? Tutor promotes change in behaviour previously restricted by learned cultural norms. Tutor completes ILP for Learners. Tutor uses creative activity sheets. Tutor sets and marks homework for every class. Students have opportunities to go on cultural trips. Tutor embeds ICT. Learners are made to feel safe and are aware of safeguarding procedures. Learners make good progress. Tutor promotes healthy living and lifestyles. Tutors maintain an accurate register.

(13) Ofsted Reports Good, Bad & Ugly How do the reports match with your organisation? What outstanding features could you also achieve? Are the identified strengths true strengths? Are there any common themes?

(14) Application of data Headline data 3 year trends Achievement gaps Use of benchmarks Review of data Judgements on data

(15) Data continued . . . Data must be valid & reliable. Capture soft data outcomes. Record unexpected outcomes. Quantitative – learner success rates or numbers enrolled. Qualitative - feedback from learners throughout their learning journey. Use both historic & current data. Full range eg Observation (OTLA) results.

(16) Evaluative & judgement statements Using the correct words to describe the judgement you have made. Matching the judgement statement to the SAR grade. Ensuring the judgement as finally phrased is evidence based – can you justify? Aligning the judgements with the QIP

(17) Evaluating teaching & learning The key factor in judging the effectiveness of teaching and assessment is the impact on learning: Outcomes Attainment Progress Learning activities in the broadest sense.

(18) Group Activity – evaluate sample SAR Identify at least 2 key strengths and AFIs from your report. What evidence is there that the judgements in the report are data based? Evaluate what is good and bad and why. Make recommendations for the QIP. What assumptions can you make about the quality of provision in terms of the wider outcomes for learners? What grade would you allocate and why? What further exploration would be needed?

(19) Summary SAR is a process designed to drive improvement SAR is a reflective process turning experience into learning SAR results should inform future curriculum offer SAR is most efficient where all members of staff buy-in to the process The quality of underpinning data is key Impact on learners is always a focus of effort

(20) SAR Sources of guidance Ofsted CIF 2012 Ofsted Handbook for inspection of Further Education and Skills 2014 LSIS Self-assessment and Improvement Planning 2010 Learninharrow.org.uk http://archive.excellencegateway.org.uk/page.aspx?o=EE3B1097-ED4A-4B7C-9C9D-4EC0533C72CE