Investigation on one and two stream BCH MIMO Schemes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Band segmentation for S-BCH to increase cell coverage Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1111r1 Date Submitted: Source: Bin-Chul Ihm, Youngsoo.
Advertisements

Modified pilot patterns for 8 data streams IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1724 Date Submitted:
1 UL Pilot Evaluation Results Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1098r1 Date Submitted: Source: Jiacheng Huaning.
8Tx Dedicated Pilot Pattern Simulation Results IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0805 Date Submitted:
8Tx Pilot Pattern Performance for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0544 Date Submitted:
1 MIMO Supports for IEEE m Broadcast Channel IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1416r1 Date.
1 Pilot Pattern for 8-Stream Transmission Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1138 Date Submitted: Source: Debdeep Chatterjee, Jong-kae (JK) Fwu,
Resource granularity for unicast and E-MBS FDM multiplexing IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0405r1.
1 DL Unicast Service Control Channel Structure and High Level Design Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/1270 Date Submitted: Source: Yi Hsuan,
Distributed Sounding Channel – Simulation Results Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0749 Date Submitted: Source: Bishwarup Mondal, Fan Wang,
Synchronization Drafting Group Schedule Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0379 Date Submitted: Source: Paul Cheng
1 Comparison of DL Pilot Patterns IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/798r1 Date Submitted:
1 HARQ Feedback AMAP Design Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1029 Date Submitted: Source: Debdeep Chatterjee, Yi Hsuan, Hujun Yin
MCS table design for 16m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1007 Date Submitted: Source: Zhou Liang
1 Proposal of the UL Pilot Pattern IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_977 Date Submitted:
1 Proposed Randomization for 16m Document Number: S80216m-09/1415 Date Submitted: Source: Changlong Xu, Tom Harel, Huaning Niu, Jong-Kae Fwu,
1 DL Power Control A-MAP Design (AWD ) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1363 Date Submitted: Source: Debdeep Chatterjee, Yi Hsuan,
1 Comparison of Variable and Fixed MCS for DL Unicast Service Control Channel Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/1269 Date Submitted: Source:
UL Pilot Simulation Results Comparison Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_1204 Date Submitted: Source: tian qu hong yun.
DL Pilot Comparison Results Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/649 Date Submitted: Source: Jiacheng Huaning
E-MBS Zone Specific Pilot Patterns for MBSFN
Analysis of E-MBS Specific Pilot Pattern ( )
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_2238 Date Submitted:
MM RG Report Document Number: IEEE C802.16n-11/0083 Date Submitted:
Uplink Pilot Structure for IEEE802.16m
Discussion of Explicit vs. Implicit PC-A-MAP IE Assignment (15.2.3)
Uplink MIMO proposal for IEEE m
Feedback for long term beamforming
A transmission scheme of DL Control information
Simulation Results for 8 Tx Antenna Pilots
Collaborative uplink MIMO techniques for IEEE m
Opening report of Connection Management and QoS DG
Proposed text on section subband partitioning of 802
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Proposal on Update of S-SFH
HO DG Meeting Minutes Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0752
Sounding Antenna Switching for IEEE m Amendment Working Document
Modulation and Coding set design for IEEE m system
Proposed Change to 8-stream Pilot Patterns (Section )
Proposed PHY Structure for the IEEE m Bandwidth Request Channel
802.16m Downlink Interlaced Pilots Link Level Simulation Results
Project Planning Committee Opening Report
UL Control Ad-hoc group discussion summary
Investigation on One- and Two-Stream BCH MIMO Schemes
UL Fast Feedback and HARQ Feedback Channel Structure
QPSK Mapping Rule for Constellation Rearrangement
ARQ for IEEE m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0512
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
IEEE m UL Fractional Power Control
IEEE m MIMO RG recommendations for SDD text
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/828 Date Submitted: Source:
Session # Maintenance Task Group Opening and Agenda
Uplink HARQ Feedback Channel Design for IEEE802.16m
Harmonized text proposal to SDD on UL HARQ Feedback Channel
Proposed PHY Structure for the IEEE m HARQ Feedback Channel
Analysis of E-MBS Zone Specific Pilot ( )
IETF 16ng Working Group Update
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_2238r2 Date Submitted:
Network Coding Retransmission Design with Common Feedback Channel
Uplink MIMO proposal for IEEE m
Zhu dengkui,Jerry Chow UL HARQ Feedback Channel Performance Comparisons of tile Format Options Document Number: C80216m-09_0158.
Network Synchronization Considerations for n
PHY Structure for UL Fast Feedback Channel in m Systems
UL Pilot Evaluation Results
HF-A-MAP Scrambling for Error Handling (AWD )
HARQ Feedback Joint Coding
HARQ and ARQ Interactions
Treasurer’s Report Document Number: IEEE /0059
ARQ protocol in m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9)
Presentation transcript:

Investigation on one and two stream BCH MIMO Schemes Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/0122 Date Submitted: 2009-1-5 Source: Yi Hsuan, Debdeep Chatterjee, Senjie Zhang, Jiacheng Wang, Hujun Yin, Yang-seok Choi Email: {yi.hsuan@intel.com, debdeep.chatterjee@intel.com, senjie.zhang@intel.com, jiacheng.wang@intel.com, hujun.yin@intel.com, yang-seok.choi@intel.com } Intel Corporation Venue: IEEE Session #59, San Diego, US. Re: TGm SDD section 11.7.2.2.4 Base Contribution: N/A Purpose: For TGm discussion and adoption of 802.16m SDD text. Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >.

Overview The current SDD text on multiple antenna schemes for BCH says “Transmission of PBCH and SBCH as one stream or two streams is FFS”. This contribution is to compare BCH performance using either random beamforming (one stream) or SFBC (two stream).

Evaluated Scenarios Antenna Scheme: Diversity schemes: 2Tx and 2Rx antennas Diversity schemes: Random beamforming (RBF) SFBC Antenna spacing: High correlation Tx antenna case (0.5 lambda antenna spacing) Low correlation Tx antenna case (4 lambda antenna spacing) Rx antenna spacing is 0.5 lambda Traffic model: eITU-PedB 3 km/h eITU-VehA 120 km/h

Additional Simulation Parameters Bandwidth: 10 MHz Carrier frequency: 2.5 GHz Number of information bits: 48 Modulation and Coding: QPSK ½ CC with 8 repetitions Channel estimation: PRU based MMSE Resource: distributed LRU MIMO receiver: MMSE Angle of Departure: -60, -30, 0, 30, 60 degrees Pilots: The two stream pilot pattern in SDD is used for both SFBC and random beamforming. 5 dB pilot boost over data is applied.

Conclusion RBF shows slightly better performance than SFBC when AoD is 0 degree. With AoD other than 0 degree, RBF has significantly more performance degradation than SFBC. Averaged over different AoD values, SFBC has better overall performance than RBF. For BCH transmission, it is critical to maintain the robustness of channel and provide a more uniform coverage of the cell. In that sense, SFBC is superior to random beamforming. We propose to use SFBC for BCH MIMO transmission.

Proposed SDD Text Change: Replace the following sentence on page 92, line 13 and 14 of 11.7.2.2.4 “Transmission of PBCH and SBCH as one stream or two streams is FFS.” with “PBCH and SBCH are transmitted with two stream MIMO schemes.”