European and Economic Social Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

Proposal for a Directive on credit agreements for consumers Table of contents A. The history of the proposal and the state of play B. Objectives and scope.
Slide 1 Workshop on NAPs and IPM – Brussels, January 2009 FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE ON THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF PESTICIDES - What is new for Member States.
Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
Introduction to Article 45 (5) of the CLP Regulation
Reference Document Management 1 European Railway Agency (ERA) Cross-Acceptance Unit P. Mihm 17/11/2010.
Transposition of Consumer Rights ERGEG Monitoring Report Christina Veigl-Guthann, ERGEG Task Force Chair.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
1 Reform of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications What it means for Access to Emergency Services Reform of the EU regulatory framework.
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION The perspectives of applying ecotaxes in the EU. Christos LIOLIOS BERLIN,
The New EMC Directive 2004/108/EC and the DTI transposition Brian Jones and Peter Howick.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
| 1 Guido de Wilt DG TREN D4 EUROPEAN POLICY REGARDING MICRO-CHP EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Institutional structure of the Commission Giorgi Chakhnashvili 27 June - 3 July, 2008.
Consumer Information and Mobilization Processes Graca Cabral Grazyna Rokicka.
New Implementing Regulation DG Enterprise on the Administrative Requirements for the approval and market surveillance of 2- or 3-wheel vehicles and quadricycles.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
Biofuels – EU policy context Funding and Legislation Workshops Glasgow, 26 May 2011 Francesca Giannini Scotland Europa.
Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
National Agencies’ contribution to the evaluation of Grundtvig Action and to the National Evaluation Report on Socrates Programme Socrates - Grundtvig.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
Electric safety requirements in European Community vehicle type-approval legislation GRSP ELSA sub-group – 6 th meeting Brussels, Belgium, April.
EU Regulation on type-approval of hydrogen vehicles HFCV GTR – 4th SGS meeting Tokyo, Japan, September 2008 Ferenc PEKÁR Automotive Industry Unit.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
Overview of Smart Metering initiatives in EU
Renewable energy support schemes in the Republic of Moldova
BUSINESS FRAMEWORK AND APPLICATION SCENARIOS
Harmonising Biofuels Quality and Labelling in Europe
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
Fuel Economy in Macedonia Policy prioritisation
15 March 2016, Kiev, Ukraine TWINNING PROJECT
Empowering consumers in retail and wholesale markets
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli: Please, check the web site for.
International Open Procedure (1) – PRAG 4.3
EU Competences Tamara Ćapeta 2016.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs WLTP 2nd act Working Group
Dan Tofan | Expert in NIS 21st Art. 13a WG| LISBON |
Amendment to the NUTS Regulation Oliver Heiden Eurostat.E4
Incentives and Cross-border Cost Allocation in the Energy Infrastructure Package Benoît Esnault (CRE) Chair of the ACER Gas Infrastructure Task Force.
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Jozsef Szlezak & Pawel Kazmierczyk (EEA)
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli: Please, check the web site for.
Recent developments in the EU transport policy
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Point 6. Eurostat plans for Time Use Survey data processing and dissemination Working Group on Time Use Surveys 10 April 2013.
Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts
Jill Michielssen European Commission, DG Environment
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
The Treaty of Lisbon and Administrative Cooperation
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
INNOVATION DEALS: A NEW APPROACH TO REGULATION
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
EU Powers Tamara Ćapeta 2014.
Water scarcity and droughts
Meeting Of The European Directors of Social Statistics
Presentation transcript:

European and Economic Social Committee Commission Implementing Regulation on a common methodology for alternative fuels price comparison. Implementation of Article (7.3) of Directive 2014/94/EUEU of t European and Economic Social Committee 28 June 2018 TOWARDS A NEW CULTURE FOR URBAN MOBILITY

Requirements of the AFI Directive Art 7.3 of the AFI Directive stipulates that "Where appropriate, when displaying fuel prices at a fuel station, in particular for natural gas and hydrogen, comparison between the relevant unit prices shall be displayed for information purposes". The Commission is empowered to adopt, by means of an implementing act, a common methodology for alternative fuels unit price comparison

A common methodology on Fuel Price Comparison The purpose of the common methodology is to facilitate a comparison of conventional and alternative fuel prices in an easy manner in order to build consumer awareness about the relative prices of using different fuels for vehicles The methodology for calculating a comparison of alternative fuel prices concerns conventional fuels and alternative fuels as specified in Art (2) of Directive 2014/94/EU

Preparatory Works: Definition of a common methodology A study has been carried out by the German Energy Agency – DENA - proposing two methodologies, each with two variants, for fuel price comparison. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/2017-01-fuel-price-comparison.pdf Methodology I: The price Euros/National currencies per 100 km is calculated taking into account both the energy content of the fuel and the vehicle energy efficiency on a well to wheel basis (first variant, based on EU Data) or the fuel consumption values (second variant) provided with the certificate of conformity of the vehicle based on the World Harmonised Light Vehicles Test Procedure - WLTP Methodology II: The price is only based on the energy content of the fuel (Euros/National currencies per petrol litre equivalent – first variant - or Euros/National currencies per 10 Kwh – second variant)

Selection of the methodology Methodology II (euros/national currencies per petrol litre equivalent or10 Kwh) appears not optimal because the efficiency of the respective technologies linked to the use of the different fuels in the vehicles is not considered, which means that the advantage of the use of more efficient vehicles(e.g. electric vehicles) is minimised. Methodology I in its variant 1 (euros/national currencies per 100 km based on EU data), appears also less suitable because the values of the JEC well-to-wheel is based on a modelling exercise and could create confusion to the consumers. Methodology I (variant 2 euros/national currencies per 100 km on the basis of the certificate of conformity) appears to be the most suitable because is based on fuel consumption values measured in the type approval procedure.

Preparatory Works: Testing Consumer Opinion A consumer survey on fuel price comparison has tested the opinion of consumers on the two methodologies analysed. The findings of the survey clearly show that consumers would favour the fuel price comparison to be made in euros-national currencies per 100 km, as this methodology appears to be the most clear and convenient. It is suggested that a new price system at the filling station should be accompanied by online tools that would enable the consumer to obtain a more accurate picture of the fuel prices of vehicles with different propulsion systems. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e8d1774-fa70-11e7-b8f5-01aa75ed71a1

The methodology selected: price per 100 km The method is based on the fuel consumption per 100 km as indicated in the certificate of conformity of the vehicle and the price of the fuel in the conventional units. • The figure of fuel consumption per 100 km given in the certificate of conformity is based on the vehicle energy efficiency and the energy content of the fuel • If this figure is multiplied by the price of the fuel in the conventional unit, we have the price per 100 km for the car in question Fuel price (€/ltr or kg)* ltr/100km or Kg/100km= Fuel price €/ 100km

Determination of the Price as amounts of applicable currency per 100 km The fuel consumption value is based on the World Harmonised Light Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP) starting from September 2017 for new type of vehicles and from September 2018 for all new vehicles. This test procedure replaces the currently used New European Test Cycle (NEDC) As no values for fuel consumption are provided in the certificate of conformity of the vehicles regarding different biofuel blends with petrol or diesel, Member States may use their own data in order to determine such values The methodology described, in order to be operational, requires a reference to average fuel prices. It would seem appropriate to calculate the average price of the relevant fuel per conventional unit over maximum the last calendar quarter prior to the time of calculation

A common methodology for Fuel Price Comparison The use of the methodology described supposes that each Member State must established appropriate vehicle samples Cars in that sample would need to have at least similar power and weight and should represent the use of conventional fuels and alternative fuels The display is a matter for Member States.

A Common methodology for Fuel Price Comparison/Better Regulation Use could be made of the opportunities offered by digitalisation such as online tools, which can be specified by Member States authorities, which could enhance the advantages of the methodology. This could allow users to obtain information relevant to all vehicle models Thirteen feedbacks were received and published (Better Regulation portal).

The interpretation of Art 7 The interpretation of Art 7.3 in relation to the impact with the existing legislation The display referred to in Article 7.3 of Directive 2014/94 does not aim at replacing the display of prices in the measurement units existing in the MS, but constitutes an element of "comparison" to be added for information. As such, a display in the form of "Euros per 100 km "would not be questionable under Directives 98/6/EC (consumer protection in the indication of the prices), 2005/29/EC (unfair commercial practices Directive) and 2011/83/EU (consumers rights). On the other hand, it would be contrary to the provisions of Directive 98/6 to replace the display, at the totem, in conventional units by a display of a price comparison.

Programme Support Action The overall objectives are: To support a consistent and harmonised implementation of article 7.3 in of the Alternative fuel infrastructure Directive in all Member States To support Member States in making consumer information available in via digital tools (to be advertised also at filling stations)

Programme Support Action The specific objectives: To inform consumers, fuel suppliers, consumers organization and media on the methodology set out in the Commission Implementing Regulation Definition of the contents, format and location of the fuel price information To explore possible ways and locations to display the prices at the filling stations on the basis of the methodology adopted: Pilot test will be carried out in different filling stations (placed in urban areas and highways) at least in 9 Member States To develop an on-line tool to display the fuel prices for all models of vehicles. The elaboration of recommendations and/or guidelines to be addressed to Member States. Participation: At least 9 MS. Budget: 2 MEUR

European and Economic Social Committee Thank you for your attention! Antonio Tricas Aizpun