Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constraining Inflation Histories with the CMB & Large Scale Structure Dynamical & Resolution Trajectories for Inflation then & now Dick Bond.
Advertisements

Dark Energy BAO Intensity Mapping T. Chang, UP, J. Peterson, P. McDonald PRL 100, (March 5, 2008) UP, L. Staveley-Smith, J. Peterson, T. Chang arXiv:
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University Shaun Cole for Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Cosmological simulations.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
Hydrogen 21cm Cosmology Tzu-Ching Chang (ASIAA)
Observational Constraints on Sudden Future Singularity Models Hoda Ghodsi – Supervisor: Dr Martin Hendry Glasgow University, UK Grassmannian Conference.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
Cosmology from Topology of Large Scale Structure of the Universe RESCEU Symposium on Astroparticle Physics and Cosmology 11-14, November 2008 Changbom.
Å rhus, 4 September 2007 Julien Lesgourgues (LAPTH, Annecy, France)
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
PRE-SUSY Karlsruhe July 2007 Rocky Kolb The University of Chicago Cosmology 101 Rocky I : The Universe Observed Rocky II :Dark Matter Rocky III :Dark Energy.
CMB as a physics laboratory
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Program 1.The standard cosmological model 2.The observed universe 3.Inflation. Neutrinos in cosmology.
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Inflation, Expansion, Acceleration Two observed properties of the Universe, homogeneity and isotropy, constitute the Cosmological Principle Manifest in.
Quiz 4 Distribution of Grades: No Curve. The Big Bang Hubble expansion law depends on the amount of matter and energy (both are equivalent!) in the Universe;
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Early times CMB.
Cosmology from CMB Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the.
Modern State of Cosmology V.N. Lukash Astro Space Centre of Lebedev Physics Institute Cherenkov Conference-2004.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
The Current State of Observational Cosmology JPO: Cochin(05/01/04)
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
PREDRAG JOVANOVIĆ AND LUKA Č. POPOVIĆ ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY BELGRADE, SERBIA Gravitational Lensing Statistics and Cosmology.
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Yun Wang, 3/2011 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and DE Figure of Merit Yun Wang Yun Wang WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 BAO as a robust.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
The measurement of q 0 If objects are observed at large distances of known brightness (standard candles), we can measure the amount of deceleration since.
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Ignacy Sawicki Université de Genève Understanding Dark Energy.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
L2: The Cosmic Microwave Background & the Fluctuation History of the Universe & the Basic Cosmological Parameters Dick Bond.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
The Cosmic Microwave Background
Universe Tenth Edition Chapter 25 Cosmology: The Origin and Evolution of the Universe Roger Freedman Robert Geller William Kaufmann III.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
DESY, 30 September 2008 Julien Lesgourgues (CERN & EPFL)
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
The cross-correlation between CMB and 21-cm fluctuations during the epoch of reionization Hiroyuki Tashiro N. Aghanim (IAS, Paris-sud Univ.) M. Langer.
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
The Three Legs of the Cosmos Robert Knop Astronomy 205 Vanderbilt University
The Dark Side of the Universe
Summary Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University
WEIGHING THE UNIVERSE Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University.
The Standard Model of Cosmology
Observational limits on dark energy
Princeton University & APC
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
Images: M. Blanton. Images: M. Blanton Figures: M. Blanton & SDSS.
Large Scale Structure of the Universe
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Complexity in cosmic structures
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys Changbom Park Feb. 27, 2008 School of Physics Korea Institute for Advanced Study

A sketch of Astronomer's methods to measure cosmological parameters (DE's w)

『What we want to know』 1. Spacetime 2. Matter 3. Phenomena/Laws Homogeneous & isotropic space Geometry & topology of space (flat & infinite?) Expansion of space ( matter) Past and future of the Universe (why now?) 2. Matter Contents and nature (what & how much) Primordial fluctuation () Structure formation (when & how, environment) 3. Phenomena/Laws

the Uni-verse: a map of our play-ground

1. Recombination & Decoupling Dark First NL Evolution LSS hear & now age structures of galaxies 1. Recombination & Decoupling  CMB radiation. Let there be primeval light ! 2. Dark Age  What is buried here? 2. First structures & Reionization  Let there be star light ! 4. High-z objects and Evolution of galaxies  Quasars, Ly-a forest clouds 5. Large-scale structure and nearby objects  Cosmic zoo: clusters, voids, filaments & walls of galaxies Recent events in the universe

Expansion of space & Growth of structures Ideas to draw information on the universe 1. Look at primordial fluctuations directly CMB (+neutrino, gravitational wave) => geometry of space, matter contents, matter P(k), non-Gaussianity 3. Study the expansion history of the space : H(t) or r(z) use standard candle (SN Ia), rulers (BAO, topology) => matter contents (DE w) 4. Measure the growth of structures use gravitational lensing, cluster abundance depends on expansion of space, matter power spectrum 5. Study the properties of non-linear structures properties of galaxies, clusters Expansion of space & Growth of structures

Cosmic microwave background anisotropy: CMB anisotropy: Primordial & ISW Cosmic microwave background anisotropy: geometry of space, matter contents, matter P(k), non-Gaussianity only at z~1100, 2d map, foregrounds

WMAP Experiment WMAP Observatory Launched on 30 June 2001 to L2 of Sun-Earth system 1.4m*1.6m primary + 10 feed horns in each 2 focal plane Bands 1 K 1 Ka 2 Q 2 V 4 W Ν [GHz] 22.8 33 40.7 60.8 93.5 FWHM [°] 0.82 0.62 0.49 0.33 0.21

Observed ΔT Maps W 94GHz 0.21° V 61GHz 0.33° Q 41GHz 0.49° K 23GHz 0.82° Ka 33GHz 0.62° Galactic emission + CMBR + others

WMAP's 3 year Map Park, Park, Gott (2007)

Spergel et al. (2007) 3yr & 1yr data 3yr & 1yr fits

Shape of T Power Spectrum Super-horizon scale fluc. SW effect 1∼0.1rH fluc. with initially coherent phases Oscillation & Doppler effect Radial averaging & radiation diffusion

Spergel et al. (2007) 3yr & 1yr constraints

Park, Park, Gott (2007)

HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI 3D HI distribution & reionization

3D HI distribution : 21cm tomography mapping most of our observable universe Power spectrum of 21cm fluctuations HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI Bright in HI !

Gravitational Lensing: Strong & Weak only projected mass along the line of sight

Shear map expected in SCDM Jain, Seljak & White (2000) mass fluctuations along the line of sight -->Weak lensing by LSS --> coherent distortions in the observed shapes of background galaxies Shear map expected in SCDM

CFTHLS weak-lensing survey: i<24.5 & 22 deg2 Spergel (2007)

Type Ia Super Novae Intrinsic dispersion, systematics

r(z) relation : Expansion history SN Ia as a standard candle Transition from deceleration to acceleration at z= 0.46 ± 0.13 (Riess et al. 2004)

μ = m-M = 5log dl + 25 Ωm=0.27, ΩΛ=0.73 Riess et al. (2007)

Matter contents Dark energy Ωm=0.29±0.050.03, ΩΛ=0.71 (if flat U) (Riess et al. 2004) (Riess et al. 1998) (Riess et al. 2004) Matter contents Ωm=0.29±0.050.03, ΩΛ=0.71 (if flat U) Dark energy w = -1.02±0.130.19, w<-0.76 at 95% (if P=wρc2)

Clusters

Clusters of galaxies Searched by X-ray, SZ effect abundance d2N/dMdz spatial distribution P(k)

Future experiments clusters CMB SN Ia

Large Scale Structure in linear ~ quasi-linear regime : P(k), BAO, Topology

Geometric methods using the large scale structures Standard rulers (Actual objects or Features in PS/CF)  measure Δz & Δθ  H(z)DA(z)  Ωm, ΩΛ, w (=dt/a) r|| r┴ (=r dθ) where H(z)

BAO (ex) Features in PS & CF Baryonic oscillation in PS Baryonic bump in CF of deep redshift sample  Ωm, ΩΛ, w We know actual length! Acoustic oscillation : amplitude depends on Ωb scale = comoving sound horizon ‘s’ at last scattering kA = 2π/s depends strongly on Ωm, weakly on Ωb not on DE  Curvature of space, Baryonic mass

SDSS DR5 Best fit m=0.26 (Percival et al. 2007) Main galaxies and LRGs BAO+HST h=0.72 BAO+WMAP3 Best fit m=0.26

Power Spectrum from CMB & LSS : Ωm But biasing relative to matter

Linear scale structures do not change shape (Springel) Linear scale structures do not change shape Intrinsic topology of LSS insensitive to biasing & redshift distortion

LSS topology as a standard ruler Primordial density Dark matter at z=0 LSS topology as a standard ruler Dark halos at z=0 in r Dark halos at z=0 in z 25h-1Mpc Gaussian smoothing

Cosmological parameter estimation from LSS topology curvature in P(k) => genus(λ) depends on cosmology Inconsistency test ! given z => choose a cosmology, i.e. r(z) => measure genus(λ) => compare model prediction & measurement of genus

Constraint on Ωm better than WMAP3

Properties of non-linear structures

? LSS CMBR 70s BB+(γ,ν; baryon)+GI Dark matter 82Inflation 80s CMBR dT/T < 10-4 Late70s Discovery of LSS mid80 SCDM Model BB+Inflation+(γ,ν; baryon, CDM)+GI 92 COBE dT/T~10-5 92 LSS P(k) SCDM Model ruled out 98 Accelerating expansion 00-03 WMAP Cℓ >2000 Concordance LCDM Model BB+Inflation+(γ,ν; baryon, CDM; Dark E)+GI SDSS JWST many more Planck ? Topology of space; matter contents; matter fluctuation & structure formation

Small scale 1/√N reduction Decoupling surface Acoustic oscillation Small scale 1/√N reduction & Photon diffusion Width Δz=195 Δr=44Mpc 1. Inflation  Same initial phase of oscillation  peaks & troughs in PS 2. Baryonic λJb 2200Mpc ≫ Horizon rHdec 320Mpc > Sound horizon λs 270Mpc > Width Δr 44Mpc > Photon Diffusion λD 14Mpc

3. Gaussianity of ΔT/T Minkowski functionals G(ν)=(Nhot-Ncold)/2πA  Gaussian: No frequency, scale dependence ! Non-Gaussianity Detected! (Park & Park 03)