Prescriptive Teaching Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
SCHOOLS K - 12 Dr. Susan W. Floyd Education Associate Speech-Language Disabilities, Assistive Technology Office of Exceptional Children South Carolina.
Rationale Participation with Peers (Section X of IEP)
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
YOUR IEP By Anita Breen. What is an IEP? I ndividualized E ducation P lan.
IEP DEVELOPMENT STAFF DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 14, 2008 PATRICIA GRIFFIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION/PPS.
Understanding the IEP Process
The SST* Process *Student Success Team Presented by: Venus Jones-Turner SST Coordinator.
THE IEP PROCESS REBECCA ROTONDO, M.ED. NORRISTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
The Importance of Providing Students With An Appropriate and Successful Educational Experience By Jennifer Felty EDUC 519.
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
Assistive Technology and Learning Disabilities Megan Brady.
Written By: Mrs. Carrie McSweeney, MEd. Fluency: A Primer for Parents.
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
Get Ready to Huddle! Discover Intensive Phonics (K - 3 rd Grade & SPED) Huddle 4 th Tuesday of each month at 2 pm MT Please Call Passcode.
Special Education Plan Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed in only one way,
Special Education: The Basics Rachel J. Valleley, Ph.D. Munroe Meyer Institute.
Developing the Foundation for the PLAAFP
By Jessica Gibbs. Students with Disabilities Working with students with disabilities while keeping the rest of the class on track and moving forward can.
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
Understanding Students with AD/HD. Defining AD/HD The condition most adversely impact the student’s academic performance to receive services Students.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
 Overall Roles and Responsibilities Noninstructional Responsibilities  Clerical duties (maintaining files, attendance, putting grades in grade book,
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Low Incidence Disabilities. Prevalence Very low incidence disabilities include those with prevalence rates between 1/10 th and ½ of a percent Three very.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
UDL to Solve a Problem Project Judith Kauffman Sped 644 March 12, 2014.
Ms. Fisher Mrs. Kebert Ms. Spaulding Mrs. Walker.
Getting Ready for Kindergarten Annie Wheatcraft, WRE 2012.
Special Education Plan Hamilton High School Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed.
 What is special education?  How does a student qualify for services?
Collaborative Inquiry “Teachers possess tremendous knowledge, skill, and experience. Collaborative inquiry creates a structure for them to share that expertise.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
A SSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY TOOLS Morgan McGlamery EDN 303.
Reading 3D teacher tool assessment inform and change instruction to meet the child’s needs on-going.
1 Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners Overview of the Individualized Education Program.
 Together, my Co-Teaching partner and I have 32 first grade students. All of the students listed below are either 6 or 7 years old.  One child has.
Special Education in the Gen Ed Classroom
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Designing Inclusive Unit and Lesson Plans. Things to keep in mind when adapting unit and lesson plans What follows will help to remind you of issues we’ve.
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
INTERVENING WITH DYSLEXIA IN SCHOOLS Joseph Simoni, Director of Special Education & Student Services Beth DeArce, Intensive Reading Specialist Wappingers.
Student Led Transition IEP By: (Student’s Name). I would like to thank the members of my IEP team for coming to my meeting today. They are…… My Parents:
1 Welcome To The Title One Open House Reading Empowers the Mind! All children can learn with the right tools and strategies.
EDU 620 Week 6 Final Project Check this A+ tutorial guideline at week-6-final-project For more classes.
Understanding Students with AD/HD
Co:Writer Universal.
Prescriptive Teaching Plan
Response to Intervention
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Meeting the Needs of ALL Kids
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Faculty Meeting Resource
Special Education Plan
Prescriptive Teaching Plan
Year 1 Phonics Screening Check 2018 Parent Information Evening
Interrelated Resource Teachers
Developing an IEP for my child
Presentation transcript:

Prescriptive Teaching Plan Houston Baptist University Spring 2012

Student Kindergarten Age 6 (December birthday) Loves soccer Loves to watch Colts football Favorite food: cheeseburgers

Observations Caring Easily distracted by stimuli Impulsive Possible difficulty with vision Difficulty completing tasks which take more than 3 minutes of sustained attention Difficulty carrying out multi-step instructions

Learning Style Strengths: Auditory Processing and Conceptual Processing Concerns: Visual Processing (severe), Sequential Processing (moderate), and Executive Functioning (severe)

Academics Began year with limited knowledge of letters, sounds, and phonemic awareness Has since gained the skills to transition to reading Now at an instructional level (90%) on a Rigby Level 5 This is great progress, but he is still struggling to keep up with his peers

Findings and Other Considerations Concerns about vision prompted a recent vision screening. It was determined that he needs corrective glasses. He was also diagnosed with ADHD. His doctor, family, and teacher are collaborating closely to find the right medication.

RTI Began RTI process this year in order to address his attention and behavioral issues. Receives reinforcement from the school counselor to help with impulsivity.

IEP: Present Levels Henry’s ADD hinders him from being able to focus on a given activity for the same amount of time as his non-disabled peers. He has difficulty completing long assignments. Henry’s impulsivity makes it difficult for him to follow multi-step directions when participating with the group in activities. Henry’s lack of attention has caused him to fall behind his peers in the area of reading and math. Henry’s eyesight impairment causes him to make mistakes on assignments, even when he knows the content.

IEP: Annual Goals Henry will progress from three minutes of sustained independent work to six minutes of sustained independent work as measured by teacher observation on three out of four trials in 36 instructional weeks. Henry will progress from an instructional level of 90% on a Rigby Reader Level 5 to an instructional level of 90% on a Rigby Reader level 9 as measured by benchmark test in 36 instructional weeks.

IEP: Short-Term Objectives In 9 instructional weeks, Henry will progress from 3 minutes of sustained independent work to 4 minutes of sustained independent work as measured by teacher observation on 3 out of 4 trials. In 18 instructional weeks, Henry will progress from 4 minutes of sustained independent work to 5 minutes of sustained independent work as measured by teacher observation on 3 out of 4 trials. In 27 instructional weeks, Henry will progress from 5 minutes of sustained independent work to 6 minutes of sustained independent work as measured by teacher observation on 3 out of 4 trials.

IEP: Short-Term Objectives In 9 instructional weeks, Henry will progress from a 90% on a level 5 Rigby Reader to a 90% on a level 6 Rigby Reader as measured by a benchmark assessment. In 18 instructional weeks, Henry will progress from a 90% on a level 6 Rigby Reader to a 90% on a level 7 Rigby Reader as measured by a benchmark assessment. In 27 instructional weeks, Henry will progress from a 90% on a level 7 Rigby Reader to a 90% on a level 8 Rigby Reader as measured by a benchmark assessment.

How will the goals be measured? Henry’s progress will be monitored by documented teacher observations, reading benchmark exams, and mixed one-digit math assessments. Other assessments that will aid in his instruction are TPRI, Stanford, and teacher-made tests. Reports will be provided quarterly.

Services Henry will participate in the regular classroom for social studies, science, language arts, ancillary, reading, math and special programs. He will receive pull out services from the school counselor to help regulate his impulsivity for 60 minutes each week. He will receive small group re-teaching in the areas of math and reading for 75 minutes each week with his regular education teacher. Henry will be given shortened or segmented independent assignments. Each part will take 6 minutes of focus. Henry will receive auditory reminders of the steps needed to complete assignments. He will also receive auditory reminders and kinesthetic practice of the rules.

Least Restrictive Environment Henry will not participate in rest time twice a week to accommodate his 60 minutes with the counselor.

Testing Accommodations Henry will be tested in a small group of no more than 3 of his peers.

Alternate Assessment The child will take all state and district-wide exams.

Transition Services     This portion of the IEP is not yet applicable because the child is not yet 16.                                      

Prescriptive Teaching Plan Text: “Time for Play” (Level 5/6) Modalities: Auditory: Children hear the story first Visual: The book has visual words and pictures Kinesthetic: students will move letters to make words. They will also act out the text

Prescriptive Teaching Plan Modalities will switch every few minutes to help accommodate Henry’s attention issues. Peers not involved with the lesson would be participating in a multi-step assignment independently.