Strategic Coordination Group Eutrophication Guidance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The European Eutrophication Activity and the UWWT and Nitrate Directives Ana Cristina Cardoso.
Advertisements

The need for better integration between science and management MARE workshop 1-3 December 2004 Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
1 JRC – Ispra, Eutrophication Workshop 14 th -15 th September 2004 A conceptual framework for monitoring and assessment of Eutrophication in different.
ECOSTAT WG2A meeting 7-8 October 2004 Eutrophication Activity Status report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso.
WG 2A ECOSTAT Meeting 4-5 March 2004 Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT summary Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The.
Water.europa.eu Priority substances inventoryemissions, discharges and losses Priority substances inventory emissions, discharges and losses Working Group.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Working Group A ECOSTAT Ecological Status 7th Meeting Stresa, Lago Maggiore, Italy
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
New Work Programme and mandates 2005/2006
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
Water and Marine Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.
Ana Cristina Cardoso & Mark Dowell
Water Directors’ Meeting Common Implementation Strategy
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
European Commission DG Environment
MSFD Com Dec 2010/ 477/ EU review Recommendations for D2
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Draft Work programme / revised mandate for WG F
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Introduction & objectives Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute.
Progress SOE –drafting group
Ad-hoc Activity: Biodiversity and Water Progress Report
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Draft Mandate and Proposed Approach for the Drafting Group on
Meeting of Water Directors Eutrophication Guidance
New mandates for Working Groups A, C and D including GIS
Meeting of Water Directors Future Work Programme of the CIS
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
The Common Implementation Strategy – an overview
WG GES: Decision review progress
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Main blocks of discussion
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
EU Water Framework Directive
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
Session 1: The report on CIS-members´ views on the experience in the implementation of the economic aspects of the WFD.
Strategic Coordination Group 2007 Reporting Guidance on Monitoring
Ad-hoc Activity: Biodiversity and Water Progress Report
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
EIONET and EUROWATERNET Common Implementation Strategy
Eutrophication activity
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Activity on Eutrophication
Common Implementation Strategy for the
EU Water Framework Directive
Conclusion and action points
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
EU Water Framework Directive
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
European Marine Monitoring and Assessment
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Environmental Objectives and Exemptions State of Play
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Strategic discussion on the future role of WG GES WG GES, 5-6 March 2013 European Commission, DG Environment, Marine.
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Coordination Group Eutrophication Guidance 27/28 October 2004 Agenda item 6.4 - Eutrophication Guidance State-of-play

Starting Point Mandate agreed by Water Directors in Dublin First Workshop on Eutrophication held in Ispra on 14/15 September Invitaion to all EU Member States, other stakeholders and NGOs also represented Documents available on WFD CIRCA (folder “E-WGs”, sub-folder “eutrophication activity”)

Extended Steering Group DG Environment Joint Research Centre ECOSTAT Leaders (DE, UK) EEA 2 member states (FIN and NL) Assisted by a technical secretariat

Workshop documents Guidance on eutrophication assessment: overview of the requirements for eutrophication assessment in different EU directives and conventions conceptual framework of the eutrophication process ECOSTAT discussion paper on principles of ecological status classification in relation to eutrophication Agreement on workshop to incorporate the two papers

Conceptual framework It was agreed that the conceptual framework provides a good basis for describing the critical processes/ effects of eutrophication in both marine areas and freshwaters Experts in different water body categories suggested changes to the model - generalised to represent all surface water categories, by means of adjusting the terminology and linkages in the diagram

as a component of the OSPAR COMPP Conceptual Framework of the main NUTRIENT INPUTS SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS physical and hydrodynamic aspects, and climatic/weather conditions (e.g. flushing, wind, temperature, light availability), TRANSBOUNDARY TRANSPORT INCREASED (WINTER) DIN & DIP CONCENTRATIONS & NUTRIENT RATIOS TRANSBOUNDARY NUTRIENT FLUXES increase in primary production increase in turbidity nuisance / toxic algal species (cell concentration) increase in phytoplankton biomass (chl-a) organic matter degree of oxygen deficiency (during growing season) shift from long-lived to short-lived nuisance macrophyte species and reduced depth distribution foam macrophytobenthos biomass and primary production decrease in light regime toxins increase bacteria zoobenthos / fish kills & benthic community structure Ecosystem structure (+) (-) II I III IV as a component of the OSPAR COMPP Conceptual Framework of the main cause/effect relationships proposed

Table of contents of guidance Working Title: “Assessment of eutrophication in European water policy”  Draft Table of contents:          1 Introduction Context History and scientific context of eutrophication assessment Scope of the document Purpose of the document Process of document development         2 Overview and common understanding on regulation of eutrophication in international policies 2.1Overview on Eutrophication in EU legislation (WFD, NiD, UWWD, others) Factual, brief presentation of relevant issues  2.2  Overview Eutrophication in other international policies (OSPAR, HELCOM, others) 2.3  Common understanding WFD CIS guidance document Common understanding relevant to eutrophication presented in the various CIS guidance document Next steps and open questions 2.4  Common understanding of the links/similarities/differences between the methodologies developed under different policies

3.2 Description of the conceptual eutrophication assessment framework 3 Overall conceptual framework for the assessment of eutrophication 3.1 Requirements/Principles for the development of a conceptual framework 3.2 Description of the conceptual eutrophication assessment framework 3.3 Explanation of the overall conceptual eutrophication assessment framework 4 (Examples for) Classification criteria for the application of the conceptual framework 5 Examples/case studies for the application of the conceptual framework 6  Monitoring Best Practices and proposals for harmonising reporting 7 Toolbox and best practices on applying the conceptual framework 8  Conclusions and future work 

Three new chapters were suggested A chapter on monitoring Specify aspects in the existing Guidance on Monitoring relevant for eutrophication assessment How to monitor pressures (nutrient loading) from different sources How to harmonise the monitoring in a way to satisfy the requirements in the different directives dealing with eutrophication Recommendations for reporting results from eutrophication assessments and monitoring chapter on forthcoming tasks and next steps, e.g. link of assessment to pressures, sources and cost-effective measures.

Timetable next steps Oct: Meeting report Revision of the guidance: 24 Sept: Written comments (mainly chapter 2) 4 Oct: Revised guidance (chapters 1-4) Comments by Eutro Network directly to SCG members REVISION NOT COMPLETED YET 27/28 Oct: Discussion SCG on what to present to WD 19 Nov: Presentation to Water Directors on whether the process is going in the right direction Nov. 2004: Next steering group to organise follow-up First half 2005: Next Eutrophication workshop (to be further discussed in Steering Group)