Division Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax Connector Bus Service Plans HOT Lanes and Dulles Rail Phase I Fairfax County Board of.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
Monterey Branch Line Association of Environmental Professionals and American Planning Association July 28, 2010.
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
Charlotte Area Transit System Sprinter Enhanced Bus Project Implementation NCAMPO Conference May 2012 Travis Pollack, AICP.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Mid Ohio Development Exchange (MODE) Presentation January 16, 2014.
MAC -- Update on CTfastrak October 16, What is CTfastrak? Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) –Fast, frequent, reliable service throughout.
Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis Findings Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee November 26, 2012.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
Webinar Presentation January 21, 2014 Commuter Corridors Study Welcome!
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project Description August 11, 2011.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority THE HEATHLINE EUCLID CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Michael J. Schipper, P.E DGM- Engineering & Project.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: The Boston Silver Line Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for.
1 AASHTO: SCOPT/MTAP Winter Meeting METRO Update: Light Rail Operations and the Status of Future Corridors Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Project Development.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
Imagine the Possibilities… Vision from the 2002 Rail Plan.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP)
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
Regional Roads Committee
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP)
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
North-South Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Central Avenue Rapid Transit
Presentation transcript:

Division Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project August 2012

Project Background 2003 – Great Transit Grand Tomorrows (GT2) study initiated – Purpose: Identify potential needs for future transit investment – Process: task force of community leaders and stakeholders examined needs of the areas population, considered multiple transit modes, corridors, and alignments to develop a wide range of options – Funding sources: Federal Transportation Administration (FTA), Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), Urban Cooperation Board, Wege Foundation – Alternatives Analysis – Priority recommendation: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Division Avenue 2007 – Locally Preferred Alternative – Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) was selected and approved

Analysis Criteria Evaluation of future transit needs was based on: – Population growth and employment areas – Population growth in southern Kent County; Michigan Street in downtown Grand Rapids: largest employment center in West Michigan – Location of major activity centers – Congestion and mobility – Commuting alternative to US-131 – Economic development potential – Multiple locations for redevelopment and revitalization along Division Avenue – Travel patterns and existing transit use – Route 1 (Division) ridership = 3,283 rides/weekday – Opportunities for future connectivity on east/west thoroughfares – Location or potential of transit supportive land use – Cost effectiveness – Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is approximately 1/3 of the cost of equivalent Light Rail (LRT) – Land use benefits

Project Timeline Each step in this process required full federal approval from the FTA (Federal Transportation Administration) and was subject to financial, logistical, and regulatory standards for viability. In addition, Rapid staff has worked with staff at the federal level that has spanned two presidential administrations.

What is Bus Rapid Transit? From the National Bus Rapid Transit Institute ( BRT is an innovative, high capacity, lower cost public transit solution that can significantly improve urban mobility. This permanent, integrated system uses buses or specialized vehicles on roadways or dedicated lanes to quickly and efficiently transport passengers to their destinations, while offering the flexibility to meet transit demand. BRT systems can easily be customized to community needs and incorporate state-of-the-art, low-cost technologies that result in more passengers and less congestion. BRT in West Michigan: Shared (non-rush hour) and dedicated (rush hour) lanes for bus use on Division Avenue (no exclusive or separated lanes) Several operational features to decrease travel times

Benefits of Bus Rapid Transit Travel Benefits: Faster commute (fewer stops, quick boarding, signal priority) Improved regional mobility and community cohesiveness Cost effectiveness Community Benefits: Increases access to employment; construction and transit job creation Improves air quality, reduces congestion Stimulates economic development: transit oriented development, efficient land use Cost effectiveness, potential for high return on investment Streetscape improvements Utility upgrades Police and Fire access to Traffic Signal Priority (TSP) and safety surveillance

Project Elements 9.6 Miles from downtown Grand Rapids to Division and 60 th St. 18 stations (33 independent platforms) Pre-pay fare vending and level boarding Real-time arrival information 10-minute peak frequency and minute off-peak frequency Hours of service from 5:30 AM – 12:30 AM on weekdays Dedicated lanes during weekday peak hours Traffic Signal Priority (TSP) at intersections Unique branding of stations and vehicles 10 hybrid-electric vehicles

Project Budget Capital Budget: Federal Transit Administration: $31,885,617 Michigan Department of Transportation: $7,971,405 Local: $0 Total project budget:$39,857,022 Operating Budget* (estimated cost): Local property tax millage $1,224,243 *Operational funds for the Bus Rapid Transit project will come from the public transportation millage approved in May Of the total approved millage increase, operational costs of the BRT represent approximately 32% (shown in the following chart). Compared to the overall operating budget for The Rapid ($35,639,300 in 2010), the operating costs of the BRT represent approximately 3.5%.

Operational Funding As a percentage of the May 2011 Public Transportation Millage

Project Alignment Directly connects downtown Grand Rapids and South Division to major employment areas and activity centers Total travel time from Division and 60 th street to Michigan Street will be less than a half-hour This is approximately 40% faster than current service on Division

Station Elements Platforms are 60 long Shelters are either 48 or 36 depending on available space Platforms are raised for quick and level boarding Lighting Snow melt system Emergency phone Close circuit television Real-time bus arrival signs Fare vending machines Bike racks and benches

Station Design – Shelter and Platform

Station Design – Real Time, Fare Vending, and Bike Racks

Vehicles – 40 Hybrid Electric

Landscape/Streetscape – Division & 28th

Landscape/Streetscape – Division & 36th

Landscape/Streetscape – Division & 44th

Landscape/Streetscape – Division & 54th

Landscape/Streetscape – Division & 60th

Project Schedule and Next Steps Schedule October/November, 2012 – Project Construction Grant Agreement November/December, 2012 – Final Design April, 2013 – Construction Begins August, 2014 – Revenue Operations Next Steps Continued public outreach and preconstruction activities Open channels for feedback, questions, and concerns at: on twitter