Data Literacy Survey results and Data Protocols

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Advertisements

Progression, Achievement and Pathways for Junior Social Studies
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 Literacy and Numeracy Across the Curriculum May 2008.
A big picture of the curriculum Adapted with thanks to colleagues at the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) Working draft: With.
Principles of Assessment
Overall Teacher Judgements
Tracking Progress in the Broad General Education Lyndsay McRoberts Kyle Academy.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling 3-18.
1 Making sound teacher judgments and moderating them Moderation for Primary Teachers Owhata School Staff meeting 26 September 2011.
Transforming lives through learning Arts and culture education ‘Content and outcomes in Scotland‘ Education Scotland September 2013.
School Development Internal Review Building a Professional Learning Community.
Lynwood Park Public School Cyclical Review Report Date: 9-13 March 2012.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1 Health and Wellbeing For All. 2 Katie Paterson Programme Officer - Education NHS Health Scotland.
A Curriculum for Excellence Routes for Learning study day February 2007 Jessie Wojciechowski Professional Adviser.
Exploring Evidence.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
Access through sharing materials Lessons of experience from the implementation of a national upgrading programme – the NPDE Tessa Welch 24 January 2005.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Florence/Workshop Two Perceptions of Teaching: The Professional Perception - Teaching is a complex process which includes: 1. Identifying students' needs.
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES & PPGES Strategy Team.
Office of Service Quality
Innovation What does it look like in Adult Learning?
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Early Years CfE Improvements Through Self-evaluation Equalities / Anti-bullying.
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education Dr John Boereboom Director Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring (CEM) University of Canterbury.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Building Our Curriculum Louise Turnbull Head Teacher Livingston Village Primary School All for the children, for all of the children!
‘Time to TaLK’ Finham Park School.
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
CAPABILITIES WHAT IS A “CAPABILITY?”
Strengths/weaknesses
Teachers’ Competences
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭 英語閱讀與會考命題趨勢 國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭
Self-Evaluation in Schools
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
St.Augustine’s Primary School
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
HIGH YIELD STRATEGIES Language of learning Learning process
STTEP project Supporting Transition Towards Education Progression
Junior Cycle Information Evening.
For further school friendly materials visit
Literacy Twilight 2 March 2017
The Purpose of Reflective Practice in the Delivery of Digital Literacy
Chapter 2 – What Is a Professional Learning Community?
Strengths/weaknesses
Lecturette 2: Mining Classroom Data
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Using data for instructional decision-making
Competencies for beginning teachers
Introducing Digital Technologies
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
Professional Learning Teams
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Monitoring and Evaluating FGM/C abandonment programs
Ensuring Success through Assessment – Introduction
Evolution, not Revolution – TLC to PDC (and PES)
Beeslack Community High School
Assessment (SOLAR).
National Literacy and Numeracy Learning Progressions: Overview
Presentation transcript:

Data Literacy Survey results and Data Protocols Data Workshop #3 Data Literacy Survey results and Data Protocols

Introduction The data team is working hard to ensure that our use of data continues to reflect the work of staff, and remains purposeful and relevant. All teaching staff were asked to participate in a survey to establish a baseline which reflects current data literacy at Dandenong High School. 133 staff responded. Responses were split to reflect data literacy of teachers who predominantly teach Years 7 to 9, and Years 10 to 12. Limitations may include: responses ask staff to identify data processes in teaching areas outside their own, therefore responses are a reflection of awareness more than actual practice Staff may teach equally across senior and junior levels Staff may be new to the school, or new to the teaching area and have limitations to knowledge Staff may be in positions of responsibility that makes them uniquely aware of school processes or programs A number of responses were incomplete or skipped by 4+ staff (this should be a minor limitation based on the total number of responses)

The Findings: House based responses Answered: 126 Skipped: 7

The Findings: Teaching area split Answered: 131 Skipped: 2

The Findings: Years 7 to 9 Answered: 67 Skipped: 66 62 of these “skips” were due to being redirected to the Years 10 – 12 questions Answered: 67 Skipped: 66 A majority of the 66 staff who “skipped” this question were redirected to the teaching area Years 10 - 12

The Findings: Years 10 - 12 Answered: 60 Skipped: 73 69 of these ‘skips’ were due to responses being redirected to the 7 – 9 questions.

The Findings: A comparison Q5: What data are you currently using to inform your teaching? Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q5: What data are you currently using to inform your teaching? Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q7: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement and progress in Literacy Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q7: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement and progress in Literacy Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q8: The schools uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement and progress in Numeracy Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q8: The schools uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement and progress in Numeracy Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q9: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement and progress in Science Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q9: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement and progress in Science Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q10: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement in other subject areas (e.g. Humanities, Creative Arts, Languages, Physical Education) Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q10: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor school-wide achievement in other subject areas (e.g. Humanities, Creative Arts, Languages, Physical Education) Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q15: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor student resilience and well-being Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q15: The school uses tests and other assessment tools to monitor student resilience and well-being Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q16: The school uses data to identify starting points for improvement Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q16: The school uses data to identify starting points for improvement Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q18: There are processes available for effective collection and analysis school-wide data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q18: There are processes available for effective collection and analysis school-wide data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q19: There are processes for effective communication of data to staff Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q19: There are processes for effective communication of data to staff Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q21: Teaching staff have broad, easy access to a range of data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q21: Teaching staff have broad, easy access to a range of data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q22: All teaching staff use data to analyse and study individual and cohort data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q22: All teaching staff use data to analyse and study individual and cohort data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q23: Professional development is provided to build capacity in analysing interpreting data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q23: Professional development is provided to build capacity in analysing interpreting data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q24: Time is spent in teams to review achievement data relating to their areas Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q24: Time is spent in teams to review achievement data relating to their areas Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q27: The school uses data as part of a process of building a culture of self-evaluation and reflection Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q27: The school uses data as part of a process of building a culture of self-evaluation and reflection Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q29: The school staff use data and evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of programs, initiatives and interventions Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q29: The school staff use data and evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of programs, initiatives and interventions Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q45: Rate your level of confidence with the use and interpretation of student data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q45: Rate your level of confidence with the use and interpretation of student data Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q47: What is student Achievement The Findings: A comparison Q47: What is student Achievement? How do you think that it is measured at our school? Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12

The Findings: A comparison Q48: What is student growth The Findings: A comparison Q48: What is student growth? How do you think that it is measured at our school? Years 7 to 9 Years 10 to 12