Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
Advertisements


1
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
CALENDAR.
Southern Regional Education Board 1 Preparing Students for Success in High School.
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Supported by 1 1 kids learn from people who care welcome! velkomin!
ZMQS ZMQS
Results of the survey to parents / respondents on the quality of the services offered during the school year Presented on October 20,
Michelle L. Doyle For Catapult Learning 1.  What is IDEA?  Who is eligible?  How do they get identified?  How do they get services? ◦ Who pays? ◦
APS Teacher Evaluation
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 6: Observations and Feedback ___________________
The SCPS Professional Growth System
1 of Audience Survey Results Larry D. Gustke, Ph.D. – October 5, 2013.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Bright Futures Guidelines Priorities and Screening Tables
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
VOORBLAD.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” From Paper to Practice: Monitoring IEP Implementation.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
School District U-46 Elementary Language Arts Literacy Framework Survey Results Created and distributed by the District Teacher Leader Curriculum Liaisons.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
1..
CONTROL VISION Set-up. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 5 Step 4.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
CLAS for TAFE Overview Information session for Riverina Institute TAFE staff wishing to use the tool James Worner, Senior Learning Design Officer Last.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Note to the teacher: Was 28. A. to B. you C. said D. on Note to the teacher: Make this slide correct answer be C and sound to be “said”. to said you on.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
SCIA Special Circumstances Instructional Assistance
Student Survey
Week 1.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Manifestation Determination Review
Cook Elementary Parent Satisfaction Survey 2012/13 1.I am satisfied with Cook academic curriculum. 2.I have a clear understanding of how students are performing.
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Profile. 1.Open an Internet web browser and type into the web browser address bar. 2.You will see a web page similar to the one on.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4c: Communicating with Families 1 6/12/201 3.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012

Overview Barnstable Public Schools invited parents of students with disabilities to take a survey in order to gather feedback on the following topics related to their childs education: Communication Issues Teacher/Staff Training Evaluation Process IEP Development Progress Reporting Program Evaluation Future Planning The following report presents survey results. 2

Participation Rate Seven hundred fifty-four parents with children receiving Special Education services were mailed the survey. Two hundred seventeen parents responded to paper surveys available at their childs school resulting in a twenty-nine percent response rate. Those surveys were then given to K12 Insight for analysis. 3 Responding Group Number of Responses (n) Max Possible Responses (Nmax) Response Rate (%) Parents %

Communication Issues I feel that I have been fully informed by the school regarding my own and my child's legal rights in the TEAM evaluation process and IEP development (Annual Parents' Rights Notice of Procedural Safeguards). 4

Communication Issues I feel that I am able to effectively communicate with all of my child's teachers, special and general education. (Effectively means an open exchange of information, responsive to communication and appropriately follows-up). 5

Communication Issues I feel adequate provisions were made for outside assessments of my childs educational needs that go beyond the expertise of the school staff (e.g., blind, cerebral palsy and deaf). 6

Communication Issues As a parent, I received sufficient information and training from the school as a means of understanding my child's Special Educational needs. 7

Teacher/Staff Training I believe that Special Education topics should be a requirement for both regular and Special Education staff's professional development at all levels of education. 8

Teacher/Staff Training It has been my experience that my child's IEP modifications and recommendations have been effectively communicated and implemented between appropriate regular education and Special Education staff. 9

Evaluation Process I feel that the school assessed my child's educational needs accurately. 10

Evaluation Process If your child had an Independent Evaluation, due consideration was given to the report/evaluation. 11

Evaluation Process When discussing your child's IEP during a Team Meeting, do you feel there is appropriate and understandable data to facilitate the discussion? 12

IEP Development My child's IEP goals and objectives were collaboratively written before placement and services were discussed. 13

IEP Development My child's IEP specifies the teaching methodologies and approaches to be utilized in meeting my child's educational objectives. 14

IEP Development My child's IEP states his/her current performance or skill level in measureable terms (measurable terms = 3rd grade level percentiles or test scores; non- measurable terms = low average). 15

Progress Reporting I receive my child's IEP Progress Reports as often as I receive report cards. 16

Progress Reporting I receive my child's IEP Progress Reports in measureable terms (measurable terms = achieved goal with 80% accuracy; non-measurable terms = slow progress). 17

Program Evaluation Do you feel your child's programs and services are effectively addressing his/her educational needs? Please give examples of benefits and list names of programs and services. 18

Program Evaluation My child has the support necessary to effectively participate in non-academic opportunities (Junior Great Books, Odyssey of the Mind, Science Club, after-school intramurals, recreational after-school activities, Future Problem Solvers of America, etc.). 19

Future Planning Would you like to be involved in evaluating or providing feedback of Special Education programs in Barnstable Public Schools? 20

General Questions Generally, how would you rate your satisfaction of education in the Barnstable Public Schools? 21

General Questions Do you think that the Barnstable Special Education Parent Advisory Council (SEPAC) provides a valuable service to the community? Please provide comments on areas that would be useful for you or would add greater value for you and your family. 22

General Questions I am interested in participating in the Special Education Parent Advisory Council, and would like to know more about how to get involved. 23

Open Response Questions The Special Education survey contained comment sections following each question. A total of 692 verbatim responses were collected. The number of verbatim responses are noted next to each questions topic below. Informed legal rights (n=22) Effective communication (n=47) Outside assessments (n=16) Parent training support and information regarding needs of students (n=31) Professional Development for both general education and special education teachers (n=27) IEP modifications communicated effectively (n=40) Assessed student needs accurately (n=41) Considered independent evaluation (n=21) Reason for independent evaluation (n=69) Information and participation in SEPAC (n=59) Appropriate data was used during IEP (n=32) IEP written collaboratively (n=28) IEP specifies teaching methods (n=24) IEP has current performance in measurable terms (n=28) IEP Progress Reports are provided as often as report cards (n=22) IEP Progress Reports are given in measurable terms (n=6) Special education services and programs with examples (n=81) Support for non-academic opportunities (n=37) Participate in future planning of SPED programs (n=20) Overall satisfaction with education (n=62) SEPAC valuable service (n=38) Contact for more information (n=59) 24