2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | www.nist.gov/baldrige Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014 Briefing for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome back! Secondary Language Arts Department Head Meeting Leon County Schools Office of Curriculum Services Tuesday, August 20, 2013.
Advertisements

Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
Site Visit Review Just-in-Time Training. Pre-work and Training Judging Examiner Evaluation Process Stage 1 Independent Review Stage 2 Consensus Review.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Polishing Feedback Comments Sample 4: Results OFI.
1 Performance Assessment Process: The Reviewer’s Perspective May 2014.
The Re-Start Meeting Warren County School Strategic Planning Process Action Team Leaders September 25, 2013.
TNCPE Site Visit Opening Meeting. Site Visit Agenda Introductions What is TNCPE? Where we are in the process Site visit expectations Confidentiality and.
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
WSQA PEPD Mentor Training Session 1: Mentoring role and responsibilities.
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS June 21, 2010
2014 Best Practices. aba.com/GetSmart ABA Staff Point of Contact Jeni Pastier Senior Manager, Financial Education
Stevenson/Whitmore: Strategies for Engineering Communication 1 of 11 Team Writing When to use a team writing strategy  When a large document must be produced.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 8 – Managing Evaluation Projects Step by Step.
Professional Facilitation
 The source for guidance on the roles, qualities, and practice of leadership in NA comes from our and practice of leadership in NA comes from our Steps,
Booster/Refresher Training: Team & Faculty Commitment Benchmarks of Quality Items # 1 –
Charting a course PROCESS.
August 16, Collaboration. 2 3 Data Retreat Clarifying Retreat Commitment Retreat Data Findings CSIP DRAFT GOAL Hypotheses of Practice CSIP Goal.
LONGER SCHOOL DAY PARAMETERS & PLANNING TEMPLATE Longer School Day Design Parameters and Planning Template Tuesday, December 13, :30 – 10:30 AM.
Site Visit. 2 Process Intent Observation (IO) Strength to Comment Intent Observation: “Double plus on the process used for strategic planning.” Comment:
Critical Issues Process Assessment of SSAC Program Effectiveness Cynthia Kuck, Concordia University Chicago October 2006.
1 MBA PROJECT Nasir Afghan/Asad Ilyas. 2 Objective To enable MBA students to execute a client focused challenging assignment and to enhance.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing a High-Quality Scorebook 2015 Presentation for Senior and Alumni Examiners.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Process Management  Identify and involve stakeholders  Find common vision and mission  Define roles and responsibilities  Monitor/evaluate team effectiveness.
+ The Writing Center Collin County Community College Spring Creek Campus.
UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.
5 Steps to Creating Effective Goals. 2 Well-Defined Goals are Motivators Manager and employee have a: – Common purpose. – Common set of values. – Mutual.
Marketing and Sales Production Process. Summary 3 Phases Conceptual Production Execution Roles Sponsor, Producer, Analyst, Senior Executive, Executive,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
New Game Solutions Team 5 Leadership – Lester Frederick September 2010.
Working with the BOSS (Baldrige Online Scoring Solution) Wisconsin Forward Award Examiners
Part TWO The Process of Software Documentation Chapter 5: Analyzing Your Users Chapter 6: Planning and writing your Doc. Chapter 7: Getting Useful reviews.
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
Tax Executives Institute, Inc. Regions V & VI IRS Liaison Meeting May 14, 2012 Quality Examination Process (QEP) Katheryn N. Houston, DFO-East, Natural.
Ongoing Initiatives & Contracting Impacts 17 September 2009 Ms. Joy White Director of Contracting Space and Missile Systems Center.
Site Visit Training. Learning Objectives: Describe the purpose of each phase of the Site Visit process and the team’s deliverables.  Describe the major.
Ensures project work is divided evenly and everyone has the necessary resources to keep the project on track as well as making sure all members contribute.
Building Public Service Capability National School Excellence
Company LOGO Revised and Presented by Rob Coffman, CGMP and Patty Barron, CGMP Welcome To the 2015 Chapter Presidents’ Training Minneapolis – April 28,
Mentoring: The Right Thing to Do Revisions to the FTM Facilitator Training and Approval Process.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
SSTFI Judging Orientation Junior High. Welcome Thank you for taking your time and joining us to create a great opportunity for SSTFI students. If morning.
Kickoff Discussion with ICANN’s Community Leaders on the Development of the FY12 Operating Plan and Budget November
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Team “ WYSIWYG ” Meeting May 4, :00pm. Agenda  Team introductions  Team communication environment – Mandy  Review team Project Plan – Tiera.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | New Examiner Orientation and Examiner Training Experience Welcome to … BALDRIGE.
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing “Straight A” Feedback for Baldrige Applicants 2016 Presentation for Senior.
Creating a Comprehensive Early Warning System to Further Student Success and Retention Shane Hammond CCLA June, 2007.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Finalizing Award Recommendations
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
CSAA Values 360 Follow Up and Development Planning
Updating Items in Scorebook Navigator
Promotions Timeline Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Week ___ ✓ Team Member Category Task Donor Engagement
Planning Services Meeting Client Communications
Wealth Management Meeting Asset Management Execution
Presentation transcript:

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014 Briefing for Senior and Alumni Examiners

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Our Objectives Review steps of the two phases (Part 1 and Part 2) of the tech editing process, as revised in Share process improvements based on your input. Point you to resources for tech editing.

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Tech Editing Process: Part 1 l Before the consensus call, o tech editors will review the teams draft work (focusing on 3 areas: comment conflicts, comment/scoring alignment, and tone based on the applicants view ); o tech editors will give direct feedback to the team leader; and o team leaders will share the feedback with the team, as appropriate.

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Tech Editing Process: Part 2 l After the scorebook is finalized in BOSS, o tech editors will help Baldrige staff review the quality of scorebooks (completing five comprehensive editing tasks); o team leaders may be contacted again by tech editors with questions (e.g., to clarify comments); and o team leaders may share additional feedback with the team, as appropriate.

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Additional Improvements Based on Your Input (Thank you!) 1. Send applications to tech editors several weeks before R-3 review. 2. Give tech editors access to BOSS. 3. Allow some flexibility in tech editor/team leader communications (e.g., feedback can be posted in BOSS if agreed upon). 4. Be sure team leaders are aware of two-part tech editing process. 5. Try to keep the same tech editor with team for both phases. 6. Focus on fewer tasks in part 1 tech editing (2014: comment conflicts, comment/scoring alignment, tone from applicant view).

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Where Can You Find Tech Edit Resources?

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Benefits of the Two-Part Process l Applicant: Best-quality feedback l Team Leader: Feedback to improve and feedback to celebrate teams work l Tech Editor: Time saved by noting concerns earlier in the process

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Call to Action l Alumni: Please let us know if you are interested in serving as a tech editor this year. (Sign up today or us before June.) l Seniors: Please consider the tech editors role in your teams planning to maximize this support (e.g., be sure to communicate scheduling that may impact the tech editors R-3 review, share feedback with team members to help them improve comments). Thank you!