Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter architecture. Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chapter 8, part B Microbial Genetics.

Advertisements

Chapter 8, part B Microbial Genetics.

Supplementary figure 5.

Microtubule perturbations affect pathway variability η2(P) and transmitted signal P at or upstream of the Ste5 recruitment step Microtubule perturbations.

GFP‐Sed5p localization defect in sgt2Δ.

Tuning the response of the DPI

Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits from DNA sequence Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits.

Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.

Thermal proteome profiling in Escherichia coli

Inferred dynamic model of transcriptional regulatory network.

Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the Hnf4a locus Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the.

Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.

Epistatic interactions and gene expression variation.

(A) Protein biosynthesis on a chip and in solution.

Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.

Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.

(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.

Comparative analysis of RNA and protein profiles.

Prediction of IGHV status based on Factor 1 in the CLL data and validation on outlier cases on independent assays Prediction of IGHV status based on Factor.

A mathematical model for transcription factor‐activated gene expression allows clustering of promoters and detailed quantitative characterization. A mathematical.

Luminex phosphorylation measurements are reproducible and have broad dynamic range Individual difference in insulin‐induced phosphorylation of ERK measured.

Correlating protein to mRNA and proteins per mRNA ratios

Spatial proximity of genes affects mRNA but not protein regulation

Coupling immunophenotypes to Drop‐seq data

Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48 protein complexes and communities Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48.

Hierarchical structure in the yeast transcription regulatory network.

Protein–lipid map in yeast.

Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype.

Downstream antagonism.

Differences in cellular organization emerge from quantitative proteomic experiments Differences in cellular organization emerge from quantitative proteomic.

The limiting, degrading entity hypothesis

Examples for intrachromosomal mRNA co‐regulation patches

Lysozyme expression in isolated Paneth cells and linage tracing of Notch1+ cells Lysozyme expression in isolated Paneth cells and linage tracing of Notch1+

Target identification of ampicillin and ciprofloxacin

Effect of the loss of Kar4 on the induction of various promoters

Characterization of Factor 5 (oxidative stress response factor) in the CLL data Characterization of Factor 5 (oxidative stress response factor) in the.

Chemical inhibitors of microtubule function attenuate signal but do not affect pathway variability Chemical inhibitors of microtubule function attenuate.

Advanced challenges in assessing translation efficiency.

Neurogenins induce a network of transcription factors that mediate iNGN neurogenesisA network of transcription factors involved in iNGN neurogenesis was.

QRT–PCR analysis of tissue‐specific candidate gene expression in response to reduced IIS qRT–PCR analysis of tissue‐specific candidate gene expression.

Allele‐specific expression at single‐cell resolution

Two‐way unsupervised uncentered unnormalized hierarchical clustering using a Pearson's correlation of the phenotypic profiles of 4281 nonessential genes.

Transcriptomic and epigenetic changes associated with Factor 1 in the scMT data Transcriptomic and epigenetic changes associated with Factor 1 in the scMT.

Comparison of proteomics and RNA‐Seq data.

Categorizing cell type‐specific auxin responses.

Submodules of the light yellow module define distinct interneuron classes with common developmental origins. Submodules of the light yellow module define.

Simulation showing that the cell length variability of the entire population can mask abnormal cell length variability at a specific cell cycle period.

An integrated NHR network.

Design and optimization of the computational model.

Subnetworks enriched for the hallmarks of cancer.

Population kinetics and simulation of E2 induction. Related to Fig 4

Proliferative advantage depends on environmental dynamics

PKA mediates the primary transcriptional response of cells to glucose.

Protein interactions at the nuclear pore.

Melting behavior of protein complexes

TIPI mediates rapid degradation of proteins in yeast.

Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. (A–D)

Global and focused views of human interaction map.

Rare and abundant codons.

Interaction of Gpr1/Gpa2 and Sch9.

Dynamic regulatory map and static network for yeast response to AA starvation. Dynamic regulatory map and static network for yeast response to AA starvation.

Integration of proteomic data into the model

The transcriptional behavior of GREB1 changes with estrogen dose and exhibits considerable cell‐to‐cell variation (see also Fig EV2 and Movie EV2)‏ The.

Perturbation of ligand depletion affects the ultrasensitivity of long‐term P‐Smad2 responses to different doses of TGF‐β stimulation. Perturbation of ligand.

Sequence dependence of Met4 recruitment.

Many of the diseases associated with high coevolution scores share genetic components. Many of the diseases associated with high coevolution scores share.

Metabolic differences in the small intestine AMetabolic genes as well as the associated reactions involved in the formation of glutathione (GSH) are presented.B,

Intestinal differentiation is coupled with global rewiring of gene expression Intestinal differentiation is coupled with global rewiring of gene expression.

Chapter 8, part B Microbial Genetics.

Genetic hubs and genetic disease in humans.

Presentation transcript:

Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter architecture. Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter architecture. Genetic interaction hubs in yeast tend not to have TATA box (A) and nucleosome‐occupied (B) promoters. All plots for quantitative variables are shown for equally sized group of genes (n=100), ranked according to the variable under consideration. OPN, occupied proximal nucleosome, DPN, depleted proximal nucleosome. Solip Park, and Ben Lehner Mol Syst Biol 2013;9:645 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend