Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype.

Published byGwenda Lewis Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype."— Presentation transcript:

1 Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. (A) Growth rates of the multiple knockouts compared with wild type are shown in a heat map. Each row indicates the first gene deletion. Columns group indicates the second gene deletion, as well as the time point (24 or 48 h) and medium. The results for second mutations in talAB are enlarged in the lower panel. (B) RGIe and RGIs score are shown side by side for comparison. Tiles shown in black indicate conditions under which RGI scores were not calculated. The numbers at the bottom indicate the medium, as shown in panel A. The conditions mentioned in the text are highlighted by red boxes. Kenji Nakahigashi et al. Mol Syst Biol 2009;5:306 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend

Download ppt "Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype."

Similar presentations

Cluster analysis of 50 genes identified as affecting variability and or pheromone response output Cluster analysis of 50 genes identified as affecting.

Cluster analysis of 50 genes identified as affecting variability and or pheromone response output Cluster analysis of 50 genes identified as affecting.
GFP‐Sed5p localization defect in sgt2Δ.

GFP‐Sed5p localization defect in sgt2Δ.
Growth rate‐dependent gene expression under glucose limitation.

Growth rate‐dependent gene expression under glucose limitation.
Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits from DNA sequence Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits.

Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits from DNA sequence Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits.
Inferred dynamic model of transcriptional regulatory network.

Inferred dynamic model of transcriptional regulatory network.
(A) gToW growth phenotypes occur in the absence of leucine, and red squares indicate a significant growth‐rate defect as compared with the empty plasmid.

(A) gToW growth phenotypes occur in the absence of leucine, and red squares indicate a significant growth‐rate defect as compared with the empty plasmid.
Analysis of mutational effects of parameters on the phenotype (i. e

Analysis of mutational effects of parameters on the phenotype (i. e
Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the Hnf4a locus Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the.

Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the Hnf4a locus Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the.
Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. (A)

Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. (A)
(A) Graph depicting interaction between the five regulatory motifs measured by synergy and cooccurrence. (A) Graph depicting interaction between the five.

(A) Graph depicting interaction between the five regulatory motifs measured by synergy and cooccurrence. (A) Graph depicting interaction between the five.
Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.

Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.
Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.

Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.
Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.

Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.
Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.

Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.
Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.

Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.
Tumorigenic attributes of FUT9

Tumorigenic attributes of FUT9
(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.

(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.
The TBON model. The TBON model. (A) Representative confocal images of E14Tg2A cells stained for Tcf3 (green), Nanog (red), Oct4 (magenta), and total β‐catenin.

The TBON model. The TBON model. (A) Representative confocal images of E14Tg2A cells stained for Tcf3 (green), Nanog (red), Oct4 (magenta), and total β‐catenin.
Topological overlap matrix (TOM) plots of weighted, gene coexpression networks constructed from one mouse studies (A–F) and four human studies including.

Topological overlap matrix (TOM) plots of weighted, gene coexpression networks constructed from one mouse studies (A–F) and four human studies including.
Structure of in‐frame deletions.

Structure of in‐frame deletions.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google