Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi November 26, 2008.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for Administrators
THE PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS New Academic Administrators Workshop August 8,
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
By A great Panel of wonderful folks.  Direct the activities of the department subject to the approval of the Dean/Director  Responsible to the Dean/Director.
Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services PERFORMANCE REPORTING 1.
Tenure and Promotion for Extension Faculty: Tips for the Evaluated and the Evaluators Larry Smith Executive Senior Vice Provost Utah State University Annual.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Faculty Performance Evaluation (FPE) Plan
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Reappointment, Tenure & Promotion Procedures Faculty Relations UBC Vancouver October 2008.
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RPT Workshop March 28, :30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Intermountain Network Scientific CC (INSCC) Building, room 110.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Kim Gingerich, Assistant to V-P, Academic & Provost Lisa Weber, Administrative Secretary, Dean of Science Marie Armstrong, Associate University Secretary.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
Academic Advancement As A Clinician Educator Donald W. Reynolds Foundation Grantee 2010 Annual Meeting Daniel Swagerty, MD, MPH Professor, Departments.
Materials presented are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute official University rules, policies or practices, or interpretations.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
A Journey through the Seas of Tenure, Permanent Status, and Promotion at the University of Florida 2012: Angel Kwolek-Folland, Associate Provost for Academic.
PROMOTION & TENURE 2015 – P&T Timetable (during sixth year) School Director and faculty member discuss Fall 2015 possibility for promotion and evaluation.
LECTURER’S EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (LEO) REVIEW PROCESS.
PREPARING FOR THE RENEWAL AND TENURE PROCESSES Michael Smith Department of Sociology.
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi December 20, 2010.
Student Complaint Logs Jodi Pettazzoni – Director, Office of Assessment and Accreditation Kim Zinke – Project Manager, Office of Assessment and Accreditation.
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
TCNJ 2015 Promotion & Reappointment Document Faculty Information Forum November 12-13, 2015.
Tenure and Promotion Timeline and Process University of Oklahoma, Spring 2016 Simin Pulat Vice Provost for Faculty Development.
An Overview of the Promotion & Tenure Process UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 20, 2015 KATIE CARDARELLI, PHD ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
Tenure at McGill: Regulations and Procedures
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Departmental Tenure Committee (DTC) Information Session
Tenure Procedure Northwest Vista College
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Departmental Tenure Committee (DTC) Information Session
Departmental Tenure Committee (DTC) Information Session
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Mid-Cycle Review Process
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Academic Promotion Information session, 22 March 2018.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Lecture Track Faculty Reappointment & Promotion ECAS
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
UTIA Mid-Cycle Review Process
Kazmer Promotion: UMass Process
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop Fall Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
University Tenure Committee (UTC) Information Session
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
UTIA Mid-Cycle Review Process
UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Angela Campbell Associate Provost (Equity and Academic Policies)
PROMOTION & TENURE
Presentation transcript:

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th.

In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus. The vote of the committee is recorded on your Performance Review Form. You have seven days to respond to the vote.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus. The vote of the committee is recorded on your Performance Review Form. You have seven days to respond to the vote. Your Dean may seek advice from the Academic Review & Development Committee (ARDC) – a committee composed of Deans and Directors from across Campus.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus. The vote of the committee is recorded on your Performance Review Form. You have seven days to respond to the vote. Your Dean may seek advice from the Academic Review & Development Committee (ARDC) – a committee composed of Deans and Directors from across Campus. ARDC shall only offer advice and shall not under any circumstances undertake an actual review of your application for promotion.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus. The vote of the committee is recorded on your Performance Review Form. You have seven days to respond to the vote. Your Dean may seek advice from the Academic Review & Development Committee (ARDC) – a committee composed of Deans and Directors from across Campus. ARDC shall only offer advice and shall not under any circumstances undertake an actual review of your application for promotion. After reflection on recommendations from all individuals shown in this review process, your Dean will communicate to you prior to June 30 th her/his decision regarding your application for promotion to Professor.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus. The vote of the committee is recorded on your Performance Review Form. You have seven days to respond to the vote. Your Dean may seek advice from the Academic Review & Development Committee (ARDC) – a committee composed of Deans and Directors from across Campus. ARDC shall only offer advice and shall not under any circumstances undertake an actual review of your application for promotion. After reflection on recommendations from all individuals shown in this review process, your Dean will communicate to you prior to June 30 th her/his decision regarding your application for promotion to Professor. All decisions concerning promotion to Professor take effect July 1 st.

Put together your package (aka the evidence of your worthiness to the rank of Professor) and submit to your Dean by November 30 th. In January, the Initial Reviewer (Department Head or equivalent) evaluates your package, makes a recommendation in writing and discusses it with you. You need to sign the Performance Review Form indicating you have read the Form. Your signature does not mean you agree with the statements made. Within one week of signing the form, you may add additional clarifying information to your package. + The external letters of reference are now added to your package. Your Peer Review Committee will evaluate your package. Your Dean may be an observer in this process. Any verbal submissions made to the committee that are deemed fair and appropriate shall be put in writing, submitted to the Dean and communicated to you. You have seven days after reviewing your peers recommendation to meet with your Dean to interpret, explain or add to the information on the Performance Review Form. Your package is now reviewed by the Campus Promotion Committee, usually in early April. This committee is composed of 10 Professors from across all Faculties on campus. The vote of the committee is recorded on your Performance Review Form. You have seven days to respond to the vote. Your Dean may seek advice from the Academic Review & Development Committee (ARDC) – a committee composed of Deans and Directors from across Campus. ARDC shall only offer advice and shall not under any circumstances undertake an actual review of your application for promotion. After reflection on recommendations from all individuals shown in this review process, your Dean will communicate to you prior to June 30 th her/his decision regarding your application for promotion to Professor. All decisions concerning promotion to Professor take effect July 1 st. The decision to promote you to Professor is made by the Dean alone.