One year on: developments since Duxford 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010.
Advertisements

REF2014 HODOMS Birmingham 8 th April Ann Dowling: Chairman of REF Main Panel B John Toland: Chairman of REF Sub-Panel B10: Mathematical Sciences.
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 3 September 2011 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
The Research Assessment Exercise in the United Kingdom Paul Hubbard International colloquium “Ranking and Research Assessment in Higher Education” 13 December.
What does ‘being returned’ to the REF mean?
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
The Higher Education Innovation Fund Vinnova and British Embassy seminar 21 March 2006.
The Research Excellence Framework. Purpose of REF The REF replaces the RAE as the UK-wide framework for assessing research in all disciplines. Its purpose.
The Research Excellence Framework. Presentation outline The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions: - Overview - Staff - Outputs - Impact.
Consultation on panel criteria and working methods.
REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)
The UK Experience of Quality Assurance in Research and Doctoral Education Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities.
A month in the life of a university bibliometrician Dr Ian Rowlands University of Leicester, UK.
The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.
Introduction to the Research Excellence Framework.
12/9/10 Pilot assessment impact- paperwork Findings of the expert panels- report + appendix Lessons learned- feedback from pilot institutions Examples.
The REF assessment framework (updated 23 May 2011)
Research Excellence Framework 2014 and Open Access 23 rd October 2012.
SIF II Briefing Session 21 st September Briefing Session Content SIF Cycle I – overview Funding and arising issues SIF Cycle II – Process for evaluation.
Research Excellence Framework 2014 Michelle Double Hyacinth Gale Sita Popat Edward Spiers Research and Innovation Support Conference.
Impact and the REF Consortium of Institutes of Advanced Study 19 October 2009 David Sweeney Director (Research, Innovation and Skills)
The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework and guidance on submissions Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.
Excellence in Research for Australia 2015 Update Dr Tim Cahill Director Research Evaluation 1.
Current R& KE Issues David Sweeney
Chairman, Danish Council for Research Policy
Annual Review Meeting for Cohesion Policy Funds Specific Thematic Focus 2 - Review the status and state of play of smart specialization strategy.
Community Services Programme Re-Contracting
State Steering Committee
Ruth Geraghty Data Curator Children’s Research Network
Specialist Leaders of Education Briefing for potential applicants
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
2017 Convening & Collaborating (C2) Awards
Capital Procedures 2017 Source: Marketing – Spring Lane Teaching Building.
Overview of DAF Call for Applications Measure 2: Life After Caring- Transitioning Supports for Carers June 2017.
Orientation Overview April 14, 2017
Phil Quirke RAE 2008 & REF 2014 panels
Funding schema to support public/private initiatives
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
Overview of DAF Call for Applications Measure 2: Life After Caring- Transitioning Supports for Carers June 2017.
Future Fellowships: perspective from a SAC member
Colin McInnes, Ryan Owens, Hannah Payne
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Impact and the REF Tweet #rfringe17
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK 2021
REF 2021 Briefing 25 January 2018.
REF 2021 What we know and thought we knew, in preparation for the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS.
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
REF 2021 Briefing Consultation on the draft guidance
Anglia Ruskin REF Awayday 2017
APICS Chapter innovation fund
Consultation on draft panel criteria and working methods
Ruth Geraghty Data Curator Children’s Research Network
REF 2021 & ECRs: policy & planning in an uncertain landscape
Research Update GERI May 2010.
Consultation on the REF 2021 guidance and criteria
Anglia Ruskin REF Awayday 2017
OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOPS
Towards REF 2021 REF Awayday 2016
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Open meeting on the REF2021 consultation Tuesday 18 September 2018
Social Value Research Proposal
us: REF 2021 – an update Follow us on us:
REF and research funding update
Technical and Advisory Meeting
UCML, London 18 January 2019 REF 2021 Susan Hodgett (D25)
REF2021: Code of Practice Consultation
Professor Pete Murphy Nottingham Business School
Professor John O’Halloran Deputy President & Registrar
Presentation transcript:

One year on: developments since Duxford 2016 Roderick Watkins November 2017

External context Internal context REF2021 decisions Strategic Plan R&I developments REF next steps

External context REF2021 decisions

External context REF2021 decisions Outputs 60% Impact 25% (case studies only) Environment 15%

External context Staff inclusion REF2021 decisions “all staff with significant responsibility for research are returned to the REF” “we will implement an approach whereby HEIs, working with their staff and with guidelines, identify who is in scope for submission among staff meeting core eligibility criteria” “Institutions will need to develop, consult with staff on, and document in their code of practice, the processes to be followed for identifying [staff] who … have significant responsibility, and are therefore in scope for submission”

External context Staff inclusion REF2021 decisions NB: The approach may vary by UoA Criteria must be developed through consultation Proportion of time allocated for research may be one criterion Census date 31 July 2020 Further guidance & template for CoP mid 2018 CoP due Spring 2019

External context Staff inclusion REF2021 decisions Other points: 0.2 FTE minimum Statement required for all 0.2 FTEs re “substantive connection” Category C Things we don’t know…

External context Outputs REF2021 decisions Minimum 1 per staff member returned Maximum 5 per staff member ‘in scope’ (including departed) UoA requirement = total FTE returned x 2.5 ‘Exceptional individual circumstances’ ‘Transitional approach to non-portability’ (NB: date of publication) Open Access – within 3 months acceptance, + ‘deposit exception’

External context Impact REF2021 decisions No institutional impact case studies UoA requirement = 1 + 1 per 15 FTE returned ’Harmonised’ & broadened definitions ‘Body of work’ ‘Additionality’

External context REF2021 decisions Environment Tim….

External context Other stuff…. REF2021 decisions Interdisciplinarity Multiple submissions Exclusion of small units Measures to account for ‘Unit circumstances’

Internal context Strategic Plan “Over the life of this strategy we will deliver a step change in our research capacity to maximise its impact for the communities we serve” “ we will focus our investment in people, infrastructure and our research institutes in key areas of international excellence and regional need, delivering research and innovation of outstanding quality and impact” … … “we will adjust the balance of workload between individuals, to enable our most productive researchers to focus more on research and related activities“

Internal context R & I developments 2016-17 RIDO restructure RI reviews & outcomes Additional £1m internal funding: HSR, MDT & VC’s PhD awards Staffing issues AWBM allocations Lecturer Practitioners Ruskin Fellows

Internal context R & I developments 2016-17 Positive indicators Research grants and contracts up 59% y.o.y (to £6.54m) Total external income up 18% (to £16.65m) IRR completions close to 100% 11% of publications in top 10% discipline-weighted citations Research degree vivas up 135% (to 125) Research degrees awarded up 133% (to 91)

Internal context REF2021: next steps Staff inclusion Consultation & development of Code of Practice Identify staff ‘with significant responsibility’ & confirm workload allocations Review outputs of ex-staff Targeted recruitment Units of Assessment Confirm target UoAs Confirm allocation of staff (+ reserve)

Internal context REF2021: next steps Outputs Targeted support for priority completions Open Access compliance Internal & External quality review Impact Finalise list of proposed Case Studies + reserves Agree next steps for RAND support Consider additional RIDO support

Internal context REF2021: next steps Environment Follow up outcomes of today’s discussions… Analyse & benchmark current metrics @ UoA level Other UoA co-ordinators’ roles & time allocations REFSG UoA level meetings