1. Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010

2. The proposed REF framework Outputs (60%)Impact (25%)Environment (15%) Case studies and narrative statement, supported by indicators Expert review of selected outputs (informed by citation information in appropriate UoAs) Narrative supported by indicators Quality of all types of researchEconomic, social, cultural and quality of life benefits Quality of the research environment Including user significance where appropriate Including structures for user engagement

3. Definitions Research: a process of investigation leading to new insights effectively shared; An excellent submitted unit will be characterised by: Portfolio of high-quality, original and rigorous research; impact beyond the discipline, effective sharing, benefits to economy & society, effective dissemination and application, engagement, applying findings….

4. Assessment Expert panels will continue; Graded profiles and sub-profiles will remain; Criteria and weightings of assessment to be consistent, as far as possible, across all panels.

5. Panels 4 Main Panels (from 15 in 2008) broadly aligned to: ABiomedical BSTEM CSocial Sciences DArts & Humanities

6. Sub Panels 30 sub-panels reduced from 67 in 2008; New subject descriptors rather than simply merging 2008 panels; Issues with single/multiple submissions (eg: Pharmacy, Dentistry, Optometry & Nursing); Use of Associate Members; Feedback to the consultation means the configuration is likely to change.

7. Selection of Staff Academic Staff…whose primary employment function is research, teaching or both; Lower number of outputs would be acceptable where justified by personal circumstances; Proportion of staff submitted will not be a factor in assessing quality.

8. Outputs Expert review (informed by bibliometrics in some UoAs); 4 outputs likely; Inclusion of grey literature cautiously welcomed; Publication between 2008 - 2012

9. Impact Broad definition – economic, social, public policy, cultural, and quality of life; Will assess at the level of the Unit, in terms of Reach and Significance; Reported impacts (evident during the REF period) can derive from research undertaken up to 15 years ago;

10. Impact Each unit will need to submit: a single Impact Statement per submission Case studies (1 per 5-10 FTEs) Data against common set of indicators

11. Environment Standardised narrative at the level of the Unit, supported by indicators to cover: Resourcing Management Engagement

12. Proposed Timetable Sept-Dec 2009 Consult on REF proposals Initiate Impact pilot Spring 2010 Publish consultation outcomes Make Impact Pilot submissions (March) Invite nominations to panels Autumn 2010 Report on outcomes of Impact Pilot Publish Guidance on submissions Late 2010Appoint panels 2011Panels consult on and publish criteria Dec 2012HEIs make submissions 2013Panels Assess submissions Dec 2013Publish Results Feb 2014Determine funding outcomes

13. Where are we now? Post RAE discussions with Schools: Research management Internal Peer Review Research Award Targets & Success Rate data Implementation of the Concordat Infrastructural developments: Strategic Investment Funds – Building Academic Excellence Online Research @ Cardiff (ORCA) & I-Wire Project Arian Cardiff People Engagement with REF Developments: Impact Pilot PVC Research on Russell Group REF Group Russell Group RAE/REF Managers Group Establishing REF Steering Group

14. Research Staff Forum How can the University support you in the preparations for the Research Excellence Framework?