ANCHORAGES INITIATIVE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Invasive Species as a Trilateral Challenge Preventing the Introduction and Spread of Aquatic Invasives Species in North America Commission for Environmental.
Advertisements

Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Revisions to Washington’s Cleanup Rules Martha Hankins & Chance Asher Toxics Cleanup Program Department of Ecology Water Quality Partnership May 20, 2010.
Overview Which IMO measure should you choose? Use of four real world examples Factors to consider in choosing an IMO measure Summary of potential difficulties.
BWEA OFFSHORE CONFERENCE 17 – 18 APRIL 2002 Offshore Consents Planning for the Future Nigel Peace Director, Energy Regulation Department of Trade & Industry.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
Environmental Performance and Energy Efficiency of Supply Chains: Carbon Footprint Project Progress Update Angelina Ermakov, Transportation Working Group.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Spatial planning in the marine environment Gillian Glegg and Jonathan Richards.
Forest Practices Code Transition Larry Pedersen Chief Forester, MOF.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
Maritime Way Scientific Ltd. Operational Oceanography & Scientific Solutions Implementing a Ballast Water Exchange Advisory Service Douglas Bancroft, Marty.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
RAPID ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RAP) Terrestrial Ecosystems Freshwater Ecosystems Marine Ecosystems.
Canadian Experience in Implementing the North American Emission Control Area (ECA) Mexico City, Mexico May 19, 2015.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
BIMCO driving – Maritime Environmental & Efficiency Management BIMCO seminar – in association with Fathom 2 June , Nor Shipping, Norway.
BC Ministry of Environment Oceans and Marine Fisheries Division 1 British Columbia’s Oceans and Marine Interests Presentation to Oceans Governance Workshop.
RELEVANCE OF INTERNATIONAL AND REGIONAL INSTRUMENTS TO NATIONAL COASTAL FISHERIES POLICY UNIT 1 Pio E. Manoa School of Marine Studies Faculty of Islands.
8 th SIPAM Annual Meeting Split, Croatia, june 2005 Constraints and future developments towards enhancing SIPAM at National and Regional level Carla.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
Arctic Marine Strategic Plan Update to the EPPR Working Group Meeting, Ottawa, Canada June 16-17, 2014.
Treaty Negotiations for High Seas Fisheries in the North Pacific Ocean Blair Hodgson Director, International Fisheries Relations International Affairs.
GUINEA CURRENT LARGE MARINE ECOSYSTEM /INTERIM GUINEA CURRENT COMMISSION (GCLME/IGCC) GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY (GEF) NATIONAL DIALOGUE INITIATIVE (NDI)
RATIFICATION OF THE CAPE TOWN AGREEMEMENT OF 2012 ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE TORREMOLLINOS PROTOCOL OF 1993 RELATING TO THE INTERNATIONAL.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Developing Ballast Water Regulations Presentation by Gerard McDonald to the 9th Asia-Pacific Heads Of Maritime Safety Agencies Forum April 2006.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Enhancing Planning Capacity in the Asia Pacific Gateway Presentation to MRTAC November, 2012.
Report from the 3 rd. Meeting of the Task Force Oil Pollution Prevention Picture: EPPR Chair at 80 O North.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
SCIENCE DIPLOMACY US-Russia Cooperation in the Arctic
Interagency Coordination in Long Range Transportation Planning
Supervision of Insurance Market Conduct in Canada
The Citizen in the centre in EU, Bratislava November,2005
Comments on the Marine Spatial Planning Bill
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Stakeholder consultations
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
President’s Report Robert B. Gagosian October 15, 2009
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
PORT ACCESS ROUTE STUDIES AN UPDATE
Land Use Planning Initiative
Masters Module PLANNING AND MANAGING THE USE OF SPACE FOR AQUACULTURE
Internet Interconnection
IESBA Meeting New York March 12-14, 2018
Canadian Navigable Waters Act
Presentation to Islands Trust Council December 6, 2017 – Victoria, BC
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
UK Marine Planning and the Ecosystem Based Approach
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
Update of Guidance document on Wind ENErgy and natura 2000
BETTER AND PROPER ACCESS TO PACIFIC MICRODATA
C-2, London, United Kingdom, 9 – 11 October 2018
Template and Process for Expression of Interest by Countries
5/1/2019 3:12 AM SHARED STEWARDSHIP STABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND PREDICTABILITY IN ALLOCATION November 26, 2010 Vancouver.
73rd General Session of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Chinese Marine Spatial Planning
Finalisation of study report
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT
Finalisation of study report
Presentation transcript:

ANCHORAGES INITIATIVE

Background An efficient marine transportation system is critical to Canada’s economy There will always be a need for anchorages – but they can have environmental and social impacts that must be considered Port authorities control and manage anchorages within their boundaries. When ports are at capacity, vessels must anchor elsewhere. Lack of sufficient anchorages within the ports became an issue in 2014 and led to increased use of anchorages along the South Coast of British Columbia Currently, Canada has no formal process to identify anchorages and guide vessel behavior outside of port boundaries Provide examples of economic importance of ports/anchorages, e.g. over 20-30 % of Canada’s GDP flows through the Port of Vancouver, and over 60% of Canada’s total trade is by ship. Approximately one fifth of Canada’s international trade is handled by Canadian ports, including 61% of exports to countries other than the United States. We will never have a future scenario where there are no anchorages outside Port boundaries --- but we can work together to identify an optimum system A formal identification process used to be in place in the 1970’s to identify suitable anchoring spots, and have these locations marked on marine charts. That is no longer the case. The right to anchor is established in international maritime law.

What Transport Canada has heard … Specific issues vary across Canada, but there are some common concerns - Noise and light from vessels Scouring of the ocean floor Potential discharge of pollutants Introduction of invasive species Risk of Collisions Ports are often at capacity and use of coastal anchorages has increased Management and oversight of anchorages outside ports is not visible We have some ideas why the demand for anchorages has increased – e.g. rise in numbers of ships, increase in size of vessels, changed behavior patterns of ships agents … but there does not appear to be any one root cause. This question will be further explored as part of the Anchorages Initiative Similarly, many people believe that anchoring has a negative impact on the ocean ecosystem --- the challenge is how to measure that impact accurately and factor in the concerns when we select new anchoring sites How should ships at anchor be managed? Do we need to consider changing to our national systems or regulations?

What is the Anchorages Initiative? The National Anchorages Initiative will bring governments, marine industry, Indigenous groups, community organizations and stakeholders together to Develop a practical process to identify anchorages; Analyze and respond to environmental, economic and cultural concerns now and over the long term; Draft a best practices at anchor manual; and Recommend oversight/management options for these anchorages. Why are we doing this? (repeat previous points for emphasis No formal process to identify anchorages outside of Port boundaries Need for anchorages is increasing and ports are often at capacity A number of coastal communities have expressed concerns about the impact of so many anchored vessels on the quality of water, the marine life, and the ocean bottom --- how do we measure After the review of impacts and processes is over, we need to determine whether we need new or changed regulations Project is led nationally by Transport Canada Marine Policy in Ottawa – introduce Caroline Robitaille if she is in the audience

Pacific Region Data Pacific Pilotage Authority has kindly shared their data on use of anchorage sites – we are working together with industry to monitor and analyze information … just at the beginning of a comprehensive review. Clear to see that in the Pacific Region the use of South Coast anchorages has risen in recent years. Our early data analysis shows that some South Coast Anchorages are used far more than others Demand is likely to stay high --- how do we best manage going forward Some increase in overall #’s of vessels visiting B.C. and some increase in the average length of stay at anchor … More detail to come as we work through our analyses

What approach are we taking? Public engagement and information sessions National Anchorages Working Group Evidence-based reviews Data analysis – trends and forecasts (e.g. traffic, shipping routes and patterns, anchorage usage, scientific and environmental, fish habitat) Legal and regulatory analysis Review of stakeholder concerns Develop and recommend changes to present practice Cost-benefit analysis of options Today’s session is the first formal public engagement in Pacific region, A similar session will be held in Quebec City November 7-8, 2017 Atlantic (and Arctic) meetings are still being planned Any changes that we propose (e.g. prohibitions) must be on the basis of sound analysis – SO IT IS IMPORTANT TO DO IT WELL Rigorous data analysis will be a challenge since the characteristics of southern B.C. do not exist elsewhere in the world

Pacific Region activities Pacific Region Interim Anchorages Protocol – a short term set of guidelines to evenly distribute the use of South Coast anchorages, require vessels to adhere to a code of conduct, and increase monitoring Pacific Region Anchorages Advisory Committee – proposed as one method of ongoing engagement Additional engagement meetings. Dialogue with Indigenous groups and user communities will be essential to success. Work together with other OPP teams to identify data needed for analysis Information on the Interim Protocol will be distributed in the next couple of weeks. The Anchorages team will work together with other OPP initiative such as cumulative effects, EMSA, RRP so that all planning and information needs are coordinated … Some Ports in Canada and in other countries have best practices for ships at anchor (e.g. Prince Rupert) … we believe that these best practices should also apply to anchoring at locations that are currently not actively managed --- that is something we will want to explore as part of the comprehensive review Taking all needs and impacts into account (ports, shippers, economics, social, environmental, etc.) should Canada have a different system? There are many questions related to the use of anchorages .. How are they identified (technical considerations) What else should be considered before they begin to be recommended for use Are there best practices that we can recommend which would mitigate any impact on the community and the ecosystems How do we measure impacts --- do we have a good baseline? Should there be periodic reviews? Etc.

When? Form working group(s) with Indigenous and Coastal communities Over the next 12 to 18 months, Pacific region will Form working group(s) with Indigenous and Coastal communities Review data and science Determine how impacts will be measured and monitored Identify criteria for selection and use of anchorages Complete a best practices guide Conclude recommendations for change One of the questions we want you to consider today is how we best interact with First Nations on this important subject We’ve proposed a Pacific Region Advisory Committee on Anchorages --- would love to have you on that Committee WE NEED TO HEAR BACK FROM YOU Could also have a FN only working group – looking for your suggestions on how to work together, and then if there is more than one working group, how to meld the two together to hear each other’s views and come to consensus on recommendations

Next steps – we need to hear from you …. What is your vision for the future management and use of anchorages? What suggestions do you have on the best way of working together to review anchorages issues? What are your ideas on how we can together evaluate the environmental and social impact of anchorages? The comprehensive Anchorages Initiative is our opportunity to work together for a future that we can all support. We need your active involvement so that we can be sure that all factors have been considered. We need to work together with coastal residents, scientists, and industry --- BUT we also need to recognize that we are in this together and that we will each need to make compromises to develop a future system that works best for all. We’ve proposed a Pacific Advisory Committee to bring everyone together --- do you have other ideas and suggestions? As much as we would like to meet with everyone one on one, no one (either us or you ) has the capacity to attend hundreds of meetings, so we do need to work in groups --- and, we get to hear each others views. We also cannot make individual agreements and our final solution(s) have to be in considered of the good of the whole.

Getting involved… Additional information on how you can provide comments and feedback will be provided after the forum. For specific questions about anchorages, email us at TC.Anchorages-Ancrages.TC@tc.gc.ca We are drafting a discussion paper with additional background that we will make available in the weeks to come

Anchorage Contacts Pacific Region National Lead Vija Poruks, Project Manager Pacific Region Oceans Protection Plan Transport Canada / Government of Canada vija.poruks@tc.gc.ca Tel: 604-666-2387 National Lead Caroline Robitaille Policy Analyst, Ports and Seaway Policy caroline.robitaille@tc.gc.ca  Tel: 613-993-7660

Questions?