The Road To Success as a Faculty Member Frances K. McSweeney Regents Professor Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What You Need to Know About Tenure and Promotion BEFORE Applying for a Job Henry (Rique) Campa, III, Ph.D. Assistant Dean, The Graduate School and Professor.
Advertisements

Chairs Workshop JSM 2009 Vijay Nair University of Michigan August 1, 2009.
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Promotion & Tenure New Faculty Workshop December 7, 2012.
Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.
EVALUATING FACULTY Lydia Fox, University of the Pacific Jon Harbor, Purdue University.
FAMILY FRIENDLY POLICIES AND RESOURCES Carmen Shockley Director, Academic Personnel Services August 18, 2014.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
New Academic Administrators Workshop August 8, 2013 FACULTY EVALUATION ANNUAL AND COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS.
Reappointment, Tenure & Promotion Procedures Faculty Relations UBC Vancouver October 2008.
Life after New 7.12: Documenting Faculty Choice Arlene Carney, Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
+ PTR at UCONN: Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment of our Faculty Sally M. Reis Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor.
Promotion and Ten ure October 21, 2014 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
UAB ADVANCE Retention Programs and Initiatives. Retention Activities for ADVANCE Symposium with Professor Virginia Valian Seminars for Success.
FACULTY EVALUATION ANNUAL AND COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS Janet Dukerich, Senior Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs August 18, 2014.
Faculty member CURRENT romantic or sexual relationship with a graduate student over whom they have direct or indirect professional responsibility - unmanageable.
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: Dossier Preparation 21 March 2014.
Department Head Expectations of Faculty Guidelines for New Faculty from a Department Head Perspective.
New Administrators Orientation | August 27, 2015 Steve Marcus Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Institute for Systems Research Associate.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Promotion and Tenure for Chairs, Heads, & Administrators: Twin Cities Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty & Academic Affairs.
Making the Leap to Professor Frances K. McSweeney Regents Professor Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs March 10, 2015.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
A PERSONAL ROADMAP (1) Meet Department Chair (2) Plan Ahead (3) Get to Know Your Territory (4) Know Where You Stand (5) Learn What’s Available.
General Faculty Meeting August 23,  For PHHP, maximum = 7 years  For COM, maximum = 10 years (under certain circumstances)  Faculty in the Departments.
Retention, Tenure and Promotion College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics.
Task Force on Women Faculty Report for the Advisory Committee on Faculty Well-Being August 28, 2008.
Tenure and Promotion Processes Arlene Earley Carney Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
Key HOP Policies and Recent Guidelines Jesse T. Zapata & Gail Jensen September 2, 2015.
August 24, 2012 New Faculty Orientation. College Contacts Dean Astrida Tantillo Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Marya Schechtman –
Report of the Teagle Group #2 on The Holistic Department Terry Weiner, Facilitator.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Promotion and Ten ure October 2015 Alyssa Panitch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs PURDUE FACULTY.
Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
POST-TENURE REVIEW University Senate July 8, 2008.
2   Improve teacher development training for instructors at UTSA, including graduate assistants   Mentors the University Teaching Fellows: a year-long.
Office of the Senior Vice President and Provost Promotion & Tenure Debrief Jonathan Wickert Dawn Bratsch-Prince.
PATHS TOWARD EQUITY Melissa R. Gilbert Associate Professor Department of Geography and Urban Studies Temple University Achieving Equity: Women, the Workplace.
Taking the Myths Out of Tenure and Promotion Taking the Myths Out of Tenure and Promotion Frances K. McSweeney Regents Professor Vice Provost for Faculty.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
An Overview of the Promotion & Tenure Process UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 20, 2015 KATIE CARDARELLI, PHD ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC.
Making the Leap to Professor Frances K. McSweeney Regents Professor Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs March 10, 2015.
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
FY16 Promotion and Tenure Debrief
Graduate Student Academic Services would like to present
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
Positioning Yourself for Promotion and Tenure at KSU
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues
New and Improved Annual Reviews
Cultivating An Inclusive Culture for Faculty Retention:
Faculty Evaluation Faculty Workshop on Retention April 2, 2010
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
TIPS: Faculty Advancement, Success, and Tenure (FAST)
Faculty Success and Career Advancement at UKCOM
University Manual FA FA FA
Equity and Diversity Initiatives Winter Forum 2006
Achieving Tenure and Promotion
Tenure Policies Q & A Session
Making the Leap to Professor
Associate Professor to Professor
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Presentation transcript:

The Road To Success as a Faculty Member Frances K. McSweeney Regents Professor Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs

Themes Having a world-class faculty is the key to having a world-class university Having a world-class faculty is the key to having a world-class university We try to develop that world-class faculty. We try to develop that world-class faculty.

Themes (continued) You were hired to be successful. You were hired to be successful. Your department has a big investment in you. Your department has a big investment in you. Time, money and energy recruitingTime, money and energy recruiting Start up fundsStart up funds MentoringMentoring

Examples of Faculty Policies Stopping the tenure clock Stopping the tenure clock Modified duties Modified duties Reasonable Accommodation Reasonable Accommodation Partner Accommodation Partner Accommodation Professional leaves Professional leaves Phased retirement Phased retirementFaculty.wsu.edu

Themes (continued) The faculty review process assists with faculty development The faculty review process assists with faculty development The process is detailed and thoughtful.The process is detailed and thoughtful. Tenure and promotion should follow logically from prior performance reviews - No surprisesTenure and promotion should follow logically from prior performance reviews - No surprises

Themes (continued) The probability of success is high. The probability of success is high. More than 90% of those who stand for tenure receive tenure, but 45% of those hired drop out before tenure.More than 90% of those who stand for tenure receive tenure, but 45% of those hired drop out before tenure.

The Bottom Line Know the procedures and standards for tenure and promotion in your department and college. Know the procedures and standards for tenure and promotion in your department and college. Dont obsess about it. Dont obsess about it.

Resources Faculty Manual – University web page Faculty Manual – University web page Provosts Instructions for Tenure and Promotion – Provosts web page Provosts Instructions for Tenure and Promotion – Provosts web page

More Resources Provosts Instructions for Annual Review – Provosts web page Provosts Instructions for Annual Review – Provosts web page A Guide to WSUs Policies and Procedures for Evaluating Faculty Members – Provosts web page A Guide to WSUs Policies and Procedures for Evaluating Faculty Members – Provosts web page Workshops on: Workshops on: performance reviews promotion to professor - Human Resource Services home page

Still More Resources Your department chair Your department chair Your mentors Your mentors or call (5-5581) me. or call (5-5581)

You Should Have: A mentor or mentors A mentor or mentors Date for: Date for: Intensive Pre- tenure ReviewIntensive Pre- tenure Review Tenure and Promotion ReviewTenure and Promotion Review

You Should Have (continued) Guidelines from department, college, and university. Guidelines from department, college, and university. Specific job responsibilities Specific job responsibilities If none, assume 40% teaching, 40% research & 20% service

Annual Review Conducted yearly for all faculty by the chair Conducted yearly for all faculty by the chair Performance during the last calendar year entered on WORQS Performance during the last calendar year entered on WORQS You can respond to your review You can respond to your review Used for raises Used for raises

Annual Review (continued) Rated on a 5-point scale Rated on a 5-point scale >3.0 = exceeds expectations 3.0 = meets expectations <3.0 = falls short of expectations

Progress Towards Tenure Review Yearly for pre-tenure faculty Yearly for pre-tenure faculty Differences from annual review Differences from annual review Cumulative performanceCumulative performance All senior faculty participateAll senior faculty participate Results must be discussed with youResults must be discussed with you

Intensive Pre-tenure (Third-year) Review Usually in spring of third year Usually in spring of third year Dry run for tenure - Same procedure except no external letters Dry run for tenure - Same procedure except no external letters

Third-year Review (Continued) Results in one of four evaluations: Results in one of four evaluations: Progress Satisfactory Some Improvement Required Substantial Improvement Required Unsatisfactory – Usually leads to non-renewal

Tenure and Promotion Very thorough Very thorough Usually after 6 years (really 5) Usually after 6 years (really 5) Same procedure is used for promotions Same procedure is used for promotions

Tenure and Promotion (continued) Decision should be consistent with prior reviews when possible. Decision should be consistent with prior reviews when possible. Exact procedures vary by college and department Exact procedures vary by college and department

Tenure and Promotion Procedures The faculty member assembles a file (May?) The faculty member assembles a file (May?) Curriculum vitaeCurriculum vitae Teaching portfolio (limited to 5 pages)Teaching portfolio (limited to 5 pages) Context statement (limited to 2 pages)Context statement (limited to 2 pages) ExhibitsExhibits

External Letters At least 4 external letters are solicited (summer?) At least 4 external letters are solicited (summer?) Optional for clinical track faculty (check department and college)Optional for clinical track faculty (check department and college) Candidate and chair suggest names Candidate and chair suggest names Writers are distinguished professors (e.g., editors). Writers are distinguished professors (e.g., editors). No personal relationship with the candidate.No personal relationship with the candidate.

Departmental Review (August – September?) The Department considers the file. The Department considers the file. Consults with the regional campus when appropriate. Consults with the regional campus when appropriate. The senior faculty recommends whether to grant or deny tenure. The senior faculty recommends whether to grant or deny tenure. The chair makes a recommendation and summarizes the case after consulting the branch campus official. The chair makes a recommendation and summarizes the case after consulting the branch campus official.

College Review (October) The Deans Advisory Committee makes a recommendation. The Deans Advisory Committee makes a recommendation. The Regional Campus Chancellor is consulted. The Regional Campus Chancellor is consulted. The Dean makes a recommendation and interprets the case for those outside of the college. The Dean makes a recommendation and interprets the case for those outside of the college. A recommendation that is inconsistent with the department must be explained.A recommendation that is inconsistent with the department must be explained.

The Provosts Review (November – January) The Provosts Advisory Committee makes a recommendation The Provosts Advisory Committee makes a recommendation Can disagree with the prior decisions, but rarely does. Can disagree with the prior decisions, but rarely does. Formal consideration ends. Formal consideration ends.

If Tenure and/or Promotion is Granted The candidate receives a letter and a 10% raise effective in the fall. The candidate receives a letter and a 10% raise effective in the fall. The candidate is recognized at the Celebration of Excellence Banquet at Showcase. The candidate is recognized at the Celebration of Excellence Banquet at Showcase.

If Tenure is Denied Resign within 90 days with no record of the denial and (usually) one more year at WSU. Resign within 90 days with no record of the denial and (usually) one more year at WSU. Appeal to the Faculty Status Committee (FSC) within 30 days. Appeal to the Faculty Status Committee (FSC) within 30 days. Inadequate considerationInadequate consideration Violations of academic freedomViolations of academic freedom Substantial procedural irregularitiesSubstantial procedural irregularities Not: Merits of the caseNot: Merits of the case

Standards for Tenure and Promotion Standards must be met in teaching, scholarship, and service. Standards must be met in teaching, scholarship, and service. Weight depends on job description Judgment of the senior faculty is important. Judgment of the senior faculty is important.

Tenure Myth Tenure is a right. I will receive tenure if I do a reasonable job. Tenure is a right. I will receive tenure if I do a reasonable job. Tenure is a long- term commitment for the University.Tenure is a long- term commitment for the University. The University expects better than average performance.The University expects better than average performance.

Tenure Myth Getting tenure is tough. Most faculty will not receive tenure. Getting tenure is tough. Most faculty will not receive tenure. Faculty are hired on the assumption that they will receive tenure.Faculty are hired on the assumption that they will receive tenure. More than 90% of those who come up for tenure and/or promotion receive it.More than 90% of those who come up for tenure and/or promotion receive it. Some faculty members leave the University before standing for tenure. Some faculty members leave the University before standing for tenure.

Tenure Myth Only research and grant funding count. Only research and grant funding count. Performance in teaching, scholarship, and service all count. The exact factors and their weights vary by department. Learn about your department.

Tenure Myth A majority vote leads to tenure. A majority vote leads to tenure. Tenure is based on many factors (e.g., external letters, summaries of dean and chair).Tenure is based on many factors (e.g., external letters, summaries of dean and chair). Faculty recommendations are advisory only.Faculty recommendations are advisory only. Thoughtful advice carries more weight. Thoughtful advice carries more weight. Some faculty members advice counts more than that of others. Some faculty members advice counts more than that of others.

Tenure Myth If one faculty member votes against me, I wont get tenure. If one faculty member votes against me, I wont get tenure. Negative recommendations may not be decisive.Negative recommendations may not be decisive. Many successful faculty members receive negative reviews.Many successful faculty members receive negative reviews.

Tenure Myth If youre well liked, youll receive tenure; if not, you wont. If youre well liked, youll receive tenure; if not, you wont. Academics tolerate eccentric behavior.Academics tolerate eccentric behavior. Tenure will not be granted if your behavior interferes with the functioning of your unit.Tenure will not be granted if your behavior interferes with the functioning of your unit. Faculty members who are well-liked may have an easier timeFaculty members who are well-liked may have an easier time

Tenure Myth Ill get tenure if I have x papers. Ill get tenure if I have x papers. Teaching and service count. Quality counts. Level of contribution counts. Other factors contribute to scholarship (e.g., grant funding).

Tenure Myth If Professor X got tenure, Ill get tenure. If Professor X got tenure, Ill get tenure. Cases are judged on their merits relative to standards, not in comparison to others.Cases are judged on their merits relative to standards, not in comparison to others. You may not know everything about Professor X.You may not know everything about Professor X. Standards change over time.Standards change over time.

Frequently Asked Questions Can the tenure clock be stopped? Can the tenure clock be stopped? Yes by giving birth (up to 2 years) by serious illness by family emergency by taking leave without pay All requests must be made to the Provost by September 1.

FAQS (continued) Is early promotion and/or tenure permitted? Is early promotion and/or tenure permitted? Performance must be exceptional, not just meet our standards.Performance must be exceptional, not just meet our standards. Only with the Provosts prior approvalOnly with the Provosts prior approval

FAQS (continued) Can excellence in one area mitigate lesser performance in another area? Can excellence in one area mitigate lesser performance in another area? Yes, but no tenure-track faculty member can omit one of the areas teaching, scholarship, and service.Yes, but no tenure-track faculty member can omit one of the areas teaching, scholarship, and service.

The End