Effective Implementation: Initial Implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Decision Making
Advertisements

The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Implementation Science overview
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Indistar Implementation Science Performance Management MAUREEN RICHEL AND SAM REDDING CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
Designing and implementing a developmentally appropriate state-wide Kindergarten Entry Assessment and K-3 Formative Assessment System: Necessary Considerations.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
: The National Center at EDC
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: INSTALLATION
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: FULL IMPLEMENTATION
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: FULL IMPLEMENTATION
Module 6: Coaching System
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
School Psychologists in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: A Discussion of Roles, Challenges, and Successes Elena Diamond, Lewis & Clark College Angela Whalen,
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Coaching and Supervision:
Accreditation External Review
NC State Improvement Project
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Effective Implementation: Full Implementation
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
TAIS Overview for Districts
Effective Implementation: Initial Implementation
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Effective Implementation: Installation
PBIS PRACTICES.
Structures for Implementation
IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURES
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Effective Implementation: Initial Implementation http://goo.gl/cwJ1O4

NC Implementation Structures Leadership and Policy State Implementation Team: C&V, PD, TAC, RE Implementation Design Team Implementation Design Team Implementation Design Team Implementation Design Team

NC Implementation Structures Leadership and Policy State Implementation Team Implementation Design Team Implementation Design Team Implementation Design Team Implementation Design Team K-3 Formative Assessment MTSS LEASA

“Students cannot benefit from interventions they do not experience.” Rationale RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE GAP Why do we have to pay attention to implementation practice? “Students cannot benefit from interventions they do not experience.”

Formula for Success Implementation Math WHAT: Effective Interventions HOW: Effective Implementation WHERE: Supportive Contexts WHY: Positive Outcomes for Students We know that for implementation to be successful, we must have all three (effective interventions, effective implementation, and supportive contexts) in place to get positive outcomes for students. Just like with multiplication, if any of these three factors are “0” then the outcome will also be “0”

Active Implementation Frameworks Stages Drivers Usable Interventions Cycles There are five frameworks in the Implementation Science model – let’s review them quickly Teams

Linked Team Structures “We tend to focus on snapshots of isolated parts of the system and wonder why our deepest problems never seem to get solved.” —Senge, 1990 School-based Implementation Team District-based Regionally-based State-based Decision-makers: Data, Curriculum, Funding, Personnel To ensure appropriate support, we need to not work just in teams, but in linked teams. A good communication flow between levels of teams leads to effective and efficient implementation by providing a structure for barriers or challenges identified along the way to be pushed up to the team that can problem-solve to remove the barrier

Performance Assessment Usable Interventions Performance Assessment Operational Definitions Essential Functions To be truly usable, interventions must be well-defined in ways that implementers can understand what is expected of them. Being able to describe what the intervention should look like in action is critical to high fidelity implementation. Clear Description

Implementation Drivers Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Systems Intervention Training Organization Drivers Facilitative Administration Competency Drivers Each of the drivers plays a role in ensuring success of implementation. Competency drivers are about making sure implementers have the knowledge and skills to implement as intended, but without organizations that are good host environments, and leadership capable of solving both technical and adaptive challenges, implementation won’t be successful Selection Decision Support Data System Leadership Adaptive Technical © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 10

Improvement Cycles: Usability Testing Plan Study Act Do Anytime we are trying new things, we can expect unanticipated challenges to arise. If we enter implementation with the mindset that we are engaging in a continuous improvement process, we can be prepared for making changes along to way as the data informs our process. 11

Implementation Stages Initial Implementation Exploration Installation Initial Implementation Full Implementation Assess needs Examine intervention components Consider Implementation Drivers Assess Fit Acquire Resources Prepare Organization Prepare Implementation Drivers Prepare Staff Adjust Implementation Drivers Manage Change Deploy Data Systems Initiate Improvement Cycles Monitor & Manage Implementation Drivers Achieve Fidelity & Outcome Benchmarks Further Improve Fidelity & Outcomes Finally, Implementation doesn’t occur all at once. By paying close attention to the stages of implementation, we can focus our work, anticipate challenges, and prepare for what’s coming next. 2-4 Years

Initial Implementation “Work to do it right.” The “awkward stage” The first use of an innovation by newly trained teachers in a school and district environment that is just learning how to support the new ways of teaching. Later in the stage, will also require balancing multiple cohorts. During this stage, staff are attempting to use and apply the newly learned skill, practice or program. This is a fragile stage where the difficulties and challenges encountered in change can result in staff falling back to old ways and habits. We can not wait for everything to be perfect before getting started… we have laid the groundwork, now we need to get started and then work at getting better using the communication loops that were established in the installation stage. The motto for Initial Implementation is “Get started, then get better!”  To play an instrument, learn to drive, or initiate anything requiring new skills, we know it will take time to become good at it.  However, until you actually begin, you will not know your strengths or what needs additional attention.  Get started, then get better!    Questions to Consider: Is it working? Are we doing it right?

Initial Implementation “Work to do it right.” Initial assessment of selection, training, and coaching Ensure coaching is provided Repurposing of school roles, functions and structures Communication links and protocols Initial Assessment of Selection, Training, and Coaching- use this stage to learn what works and what needs to be adjusted for the next cohort of staff. Classroom data, observations of instruction, and teacher reports further inform what, if any, changes are needed in future trainings and coaching routines.  This allows for adjustment before moving into the full implementation stage.   Ensure Coaching is Provided As we learned earlier, research is clear about the need for coaching in order to bring new practices into the classroom.  Training alone will not translate into classroom use of skills.  After training ends, educators continue to receive guided practice with feedback and support to build their confidence and competence as they move closer to full and effective use of the innovation.  During the Exploration and Installation Stages a coaching service delivery plan is developed.  The plan details the coach’s frequency of observations, methods of support, and routines for providing constructive feedback in a safe environment. Repurposing of school roles, functions, and structures In earlier stages, the Implementation Team and leadership determined how schools and classrooms (e.g. scheduling, staffing) might need to change to create a hospitable environment for teachers and staff using the innovation.  During the Initial Implementation Stage, the plan is put into action.  Since no plan is complete, unanticipated changes will add to the “awkward” moments as adjustments to the plan occur.   Resolve systems issues The initial implementation stage is an important time to monitor outcomes, identify barriers and challenges and to develop plans to move initiatives forward to assure outcomes are achieved. Communication As this new process unfolds, all stakeholders need to stay in communication to maintain the flow of information.  During the Initial Implementation Stage, teams are tapping resources, staff members are spending time and energy on the new way of business, and frustrations can run high.  To maintain “buy-in” it is crucial to keep everyone “in the loop” by providing updates on progress, a venue for questions, and opportunities for clarifications and problem-solving.

Initial Implementation Example

Tools & Resources

Tools & Resources http://ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/EC+Institute+-+Initial+Implementation http://ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Initial+Implementation+Resources The Active Implementation Hub Quick Start Video Stages of Implementation Analysis for Education by NIRN/SISEP

DCA

Activity: Coaching System Checklist http://ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/file/view/Coaching+System+Checklist.2016-03.docx

General Supervision SPP/APR Data Collection Dispute Resolution System Policies, Practices and Procedures Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives, & Sanctions Targeted Technical Assistance Fiscal Management NCDPI has the responsibility to ensure that all children with disabilities receive FAPE. The comprehensive general supervision system: 1. Supports practices that improve educational results and functional outcomes for children and youth with disabilities; Uses multiple methods to identify and correct noncompliance; and Utilizes mechanisms to encourage and support improvement and enforce compliance. (make connections to this PD)

Continuum of Transitions SSIP: Focus for Improvement Academics Continuum of Transitions Behavior Engagement So while General Supervision defines the responsibilities of the EC Division and of LEA EC services, the State Systemic Improvement Plan, or SSIP, focuses specifically on improvement in graduation rates for students with disabilities. To accomplish that goal, the EC Division has identified broad root causes to inform our focus statewide on Academics, Behavior, and the Continuum of Transitions. For each of these, it will be necessary to consider how we are addressing engagement of students, staff, families, and communities. This framework allows you to inform, explain and make connections between Academics, Behavior, Continuum of Transitions and Engagement to increase the success of every student. Engagement efforts should encourage students and families to be involved in the process from PreK through adulthood.

Continuum of Transitions This Professional Learning Supports Improved Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities by: Academics Active implementation of evidence-based instruction, preK through secondary Local capacity building Technical and adaptive leadership Comprehensive and efficient assessment system Student, Family, Staff, and Community Engagement Behavior Active implementation of evidence-based behavioral programming, preK through secondary Local capacity building Culturally responsive instruction Positive school/class climate Comprehensive and efficient assessment system Student, Family, Staff, and Community Engagement Engagement This slide lists some specific considerations for improving academics, behavior, and the transition continuum. This professional learning supports: (highlight areas) by (direct connections) Continuum of Transitions Active implementation of evidence-based transition practices, preK to post-secondary Local capacity building Systemic and coordinated supports (including wraparound), preK to post-secondary Consistent attendance Extracurricular and/or employment opportunities Student, Family, Staff, and Community Engagement

Contacts: Alicia Miller, Wake County Public School System amiller3@wcpss.net Jami Graham, Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge, NCDPI Jami.graham@dpi.nc.gov Laura Winter, MTSS Consultant, NCDPI Laura.winter@dpi.nc.gov Heather Reynolds, State Implementation Specialist & Data Analyst, NCDPI heather.reynolds@dpi.nc.gov NCImplementationScience@dpi.nc.gov http://ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net