2012 ITE Annual Conference Allen Nie, PhD, PE, HMM June 24 -27, Santa Barbara, CA SR 46 Improvement PSR/PDS Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

Transportation Impact Analysis Presented By Katy Flynn, P.E. Fehr & Peers February 19, 2008.
March 1, Why an interchange at this location? TH 15 Corridor Study 2007 Nine Signalized intersections Six in Top 50 High Crash Cost Study outcome.
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
A34 Corridor Strategy Strategic Route Improvements 25 th November 2004 working together with.
Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
What is the S-48 Corridor? Study Area What’s Happened So Far? Previous Tasks  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct  Planning.
SV-ITS PROGRAM: Silicon Valley Smart Corridor Project Overview
CALTRANS - SIDUE California-Baja California Border Master Plans August 1, 2012.
DDI Traffic Informational Session Town of Cornelius Lake Norman Chamber of Commerce June 11, 2014.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Comparative Traffic Study Morrisville-Carpenter Road versus Crabtree Crossing Extension Presentation to: Morrisville Town Council Prepared by: Parsons.
The State Route 246 Central Avenue Ext. and Purisima Road Traffic Study May 2008.
US 52 Corridor Study Public Meeting November 15, 2010.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Simulating I-710 Corridor Presented in the Western ITE Annual Meeting Santa Barbara, California.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
I-80 Corridor System Management Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission ACTAC Meeting September 7, 2010.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Byron Becnel LA DOTD June 16, Microscopic simulation models simulate the movement of individual vehicles on roads It is used to assess the traffic.
Localized Programming Models for Small Cities: A Case Study of Tehachapi, CA 2012 ITE Western District Annual Meeting Santa Barbara, CA June 27, 2012 Localized.
An Integral Perspective on the S.E. 17 Corridor October 29, 2013 Calgary.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Waheed Uddin, PhD., P.E. Professor and Director, CAIT Center for Advanced Infrastructure Technology Department of Civil Engineering The University of Mississippi.
Welcome to El Dorado Hills. Goals of Presentation Summarize growth, traffic, and road network state affecting planning in EDH - Especially where not easily.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Interchanges, Arterials, And Networks Last Week. Interchanges Freeway – Multilane highway Ramps and weaves are the same Problem comes in when you have.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Limebank Road Environmental Assessment Study February 19, 2003.
A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.
Steven C. Braun, P.E. Senior Project Manager. A Master Plan identified a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the corridor … This LPA was adopted by.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Lexington Town Center Streetscape Project Page 1 Battle Green Improvements Project Intersection of Bedford Hancock Street / Harrington Road Board.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System TAC Meeting December 13, 2006 Robert Bertini.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
South Parkway Refinement Plan F Context of the plan F Goals of the plan F Major issues F Parkway/Third Street alternatives F City of Bend, ODOT assess.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Development of A Traffic Monitoring Program Using Emme 3 Based on A San Joaquin COG Travel Demand Model Jia Hao Wu, Ph.D., Joy Bhattacharya, P.E. and Chris.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Community Outreach Meeting September 10, 2015 Welcome to Santa Clara County I-680 Corridor Study 1.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Route 55: Lauer Rd –TSP & Access Management. Agenda  Welcome and Introductions  Workshop Purpose  Project Introduction & Background  Citizen Advisory.
Fred Luna, SBCAG Paul Martinez, Caltrans District 5 April 3, 2013 SBCAG North County Subregional Committee State Route 246 Passing Lanes.
Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Peachtree Road Transformation Project: Operations and Safety Analysis P.I Fulton County August 25, 2015 Buckhead CID 1.
Metro Highway Program Presentation to CMAA Abdollah Ansari
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Transpo 2012 Yan Xiao, Mohammed Hadi, Maria Lucia Rojas Lehman Center for Transportation Research Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Florida.
EAST CHEROKEE DRIVE PROJECT UPDATE CHEROKEE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MARCH 31, 2016.
Transportation System Comments Santolina Level ‘A’ Master Plan.
Lessons Learned from Intersection Improvements on U.S. Highway 280 PMI Central Alabama Chapter Darrell B. Skipper, P.E.
Waterdown Road Corridor Class Environmental Assessment (Phase 3 & 4) Community Services Committee May 9, 2012.
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
TRB Planning Applications Conference 2017
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
Study Goals Analyze traffic operations along the corridor and at the two study interchanges Provide safety enhancements Improve multimodal performance.
Study Goals Analyze traffic operations along the corridor and at the two study interchanges Provide safety enhancements Improve multimodal performance.
State Route 55 Improvement Project from Interstate 5 to State Route 91
Presentation transcript:

2012 ITE Annual Conference Allen Nie, PhD, PE, HMM June , Santa Barbara, CA SR 46 Improvement PSR/PDS Study

Presentation Outline Background Improvement Alternatives Traffic Modeling Traffic Operations Analysis Project Status Lessons Learned

Project Location – Paso Robles Cambria Wasco

SR 46 E in Paso Robles

Past Studies SR 46 E Comprehensive Traffic Survey, 2005 Golden Hill Retail Center TIA, 2007 State Route 46 E Parallel Routes Study, 2008 SR 46 E Comprehensive Corridor Study, 2009 Paso Robles General Plan Update, 2011

Existing Intersection & Mainline LOS

2025 Intersection & Mainline LOS

Delays Source: Caltrans SR 46 E CCS

Paso Robles Land Use

Traffic Issues – Local Perspective S

Improvements along SR 46 LocationImprovementStatus US 101/SR 46 SB Ramps Add WBL and EBT lanesIn construction, to be completed in 2014 US 101 / SR 46 NB Ramps Add WBT lanesTo be completed by CT in the future SR 46 / Golden Hill RdRestriping, add left turn lanes on all approaches; widen northbound approach to Completed SR 46 E / Airport RdWiden SR 46 to 4 lanes from Airport Rd to Shandon Completed SR 46 / Union RdTBD by this studyPSR

The PSR Project Team

Alignment Alternatives ALT 1 –Two-way Stop-controlled (No Build) ALT 2 – Signalization ALT 3 – Roundabout (West) ALT 4 – Roundabout (East) ALT 5 – Overcrossing ALT 6 – Interchange

ALT 4 – Roundabout (East)

ALT 6 – Interchange

Caltrans Responsibility Maintain / Increase Hwy 46 throughput Reduce travel delay Traffic controls (signal) Congestion (queue spillovers, weaving issues, etc) Improve travel time reliability Multimodal and safety Vision - grade separation, limited # of access points

Citys Expectation Easy access to Highway 46 and US 101 Better & reliable connectivity Support multimodal transportation (bike & Ped) Fit into the Citys Circulation Master Plan Cost concerns Phased development

Citys Circulation Master Plan

Work Process Kickoff Meeting Traffic Modeling Operational Analysis Alternative Assessment Project Management and QA/QC Project Management and QA/QC Traffic Data Field Survey Alternative Development

City of Paso Robles Traffic Model City model based on the SLOCOG county model Three-step highway model Feedback loop Detailed GIS roadway network Horizon years modeled

Traffic Model Enhancement Post- processing

Model Enhancement Study Area City Area The rest

Day of Week Fluctuation Highway 46 Vs. Local Arterial

Traffic Model Calibration ComparisonCoefficient (slope)R^2Intercept Before Calibration AM Peak PM Peak After Calibration AM Peak PM Peak Comparison% (GEH <5) Before Calibration AM Peak50% PM Peak53% After Calibration AM Peak100% PM Peak100% Before Model CalibrationAfter Model Calibration

GEH Statistics (Before) (After) Traffic Simulation Criteria: 85% (GEH < 5)

Seasonal Fluctuation

Ramifications of Traffic Fluctuation Data Collection Use of old counts – consistency issue Model Calibration which month? Previous studies failed to consider this Traffic operations Worst or average Design For the worst?

Traffic Operations Analysis Intersections Signalized Stop-controlled Roundabout Hwy 46 multilane highway Hwy 46 Weaving Simulation (optional)

Finalized Study Scenarios & Elements

Preliminary Results: 2016 No Build

Performance Comparison To be updated!

Project Status Data Collection - done Alignment Alternative - 90% Model Development & Calibration - Approved Traffic Forecast – 85% Traffic Operations Analysis – 25% Overall project - Ahead of schedule

Challenges & Lessons Learned Data Collection Seasonal & day of week fluctuation Timing / consistency Always validate your data Scenarios Management Communication Work closely with all stokeholds Consensus Building Use your traffic model

Thank you! Questions & Answers

Hatch Mott MacDonald Allen Nie, PhD, PE Tel: Richard Davis, VP Tel: Hacienda Dr., Suite 300 Pleasanton, CA Fax:

Stop right here

City Zoning

Project Development Process Caltrans

Project Study Report Initial document of the project Include Scoping of the physical work Budget and schedule to deliver the project Define the needs and purpose Timeframe 6 months to 12 months

Draft Project Report A decision making document Document the need for a project Summarize Key points from the Draft Env. Doc The studies of the scope, cost Overall impact of alternatives Help make informal decision whether to proceed to the public hearing phase of the project

ALT 1 – Two-way Stop-controlled (No Build)

ALT 2 – Signalization

ALT 3 – Roundabout West

ALT 5 – Overcrossing

Future Year O-D Calculation The Difference Method

Half Clover Leaf Interchange

Roundabout Alternative

Background

The Consideration of Recession People are talking about it Not enough data to fully measure the impact on traffic level in the project study area Would be a decision from the City and Caltrans To consider it at all? Which growth pattern to choose?

The Impact of Recession Legend Line 1: w/o recession Lines 2 - 5: w/ recession

Traffic Modeling Task Forecast future year traffic 2016, 2020, 2025, 2035 Forecast traffic under different alignment alternatives Traffic assignment Explore traffic circulation pattern to support traffic operations analysis E.g. weaving analysis Support alternative development

Model Validation Supply side Link attributes Network coding Turn penalties Demand side Land use consolidation (type, quantity) Zone disaggregation Trip rates review

Additional Model Improvement & Testing Upgrade to TransCAD 5.0 Additional tools in GISDK for OD operations Sensitivity testing in the project area Through trip assessment (select link analysis) Trip patterns (select link / zone analysis)