Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Permitting Process Overview Alasdair McKellar PPC Compliance Officer Environment Agency.
Advertisements

Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen SoE meeting 12 June 2007, Copenhagen.
GHG emissions from landfills for EPER reporting Ian Whitwell Pollution Inventory team Environment Agency of England & Wales.
Regulation of Low Level Waste Management
SWWMG: MARCH 2013 LEGISLATION UPDATE. UPDATES  Industrial Emissions Directive  Waste Carrier/Brokers and Dealers (reminder)  The Packaging Regulations:
BULGARIAN COMPETENT AUTHORITIES IN THE FIELD OF IPPC Kalin Iliev Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria.
Consolidation of he Environmental Monitoring System in Albania (CEMSA) An EU-funded project managed by the Delegation of the European Commission to Albania.
Site Waste Management Plans Presentation – September 2009 Planning Agents’ Forum.
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
Environmental Permitting Regulations Tom Fowler – Environment Officer
The Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory (SPRI) Bob Boyce - SEPA Senior Environmental Assessment Officer.
The Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 Came into force on 29 th March 2011 Update some aspects of waste controls Regulations implement the revised.
Implementation of IED Implications for industry, particularly those involved in waste management, and the influences it has on permitting Dynes Solicitors.
The Environment Agency Alasdair McKellar – PPC/COMAH Regulatory Officer.
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
THE ADMINISTRATION, REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 1 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY; LOCAL AUTHORITIES; SECRETARY OF STATE 1 Environmental Law.
Seveso II in the UK Mark Maleham tel + 44 (0)
Public Access to Environmental Information in Serbia Filip Radović Environmental Protection Agency Geneva, December
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
SAFESPUR FORUM - Challenges in reducing the burden on the UK’s national Low Level Waste Repository 29 April 2009, Birchwood.
Reporting to the EPRTR in the UK Alex Hole Assessment & Reporting Advisor.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Regulation of distribution and farm level uses Paul Adamson & Helena Cooke.
WHO COURSE FOR THE CARs MONITORING AND AUDITING OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT.
IPPC Directive state of play and future developements
1 The European Pollutant Emission Register 4th WHO Ministerial Conference Budapest 23 June 2004 Andreas Barkman European Environment Agency.
Emission control in Bulgaria The involved institutions at national and local (sub-national) levels in Emissions inventory are Ministry of Environment.
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
Discussion Topic 2 Discussions TOPIC 2: Implementation costs.
From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
SEPA Compliance Assessment Scheme. Aims and Benefits 1.Proportionate 2.Consistent, fair and legally correct 3.Transparent and accountable 4.Targeted,
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
Justyna Grzywacz Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection 4th November,2011.
Managing data in our Pollution Inventory Alex Hole Assessment & Reporting Advisor.
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
Strengths and weaknesses of the permitting system and enforcement process in RIEW – Veliko Turnovo Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water - Veliko.
Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of.
Legislation Update Mark Stouph Director of Risk Management.
Iuliana CHIDU European integration counsellor Ministry of Environment and Water Management Prague - CZECH REPUBLIC April 2005 DIRECTIVE 96/61/EC.
E-PRTR dataflow management Introduction and informal review process Eva Goossens Head of Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme.
The Permitting Process under the Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations Ian Halliday Senior Policy Officer.
Annual Conference October 2011 Water Services Training Group 15 th Annual Conference Water Services in Ireland – Organisational modernisation and new challenges.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
Statistical office of Montenegro (MONSTAT) & Environmental Protection Agency of Montenegro (EPA) GENEVA, 04 November 2013.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
E-PRTR incompleteness check Irene Olivares Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme Eionet NRC workshop on Industrial Pollution Copenhagen.
European Commission - Environment Directorate-General 14 February 2003 Developments in the framework of the IPPC Directive Magnus.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
Legislation Carl James.
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
From data collection to reporting - experiences and boundary conditions for an aggregating reporting system Michael Nagy Umweltbundesamt Wien Experience.
Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
Cross-validation of waste statistics data
IPPC and refineries: England and Wales
E-PRTR Regulation PRTR Protocol
Reporting of priority substances in Norway
Lynne McNaughton – Specialist II National Carbon Reduction Unit
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
Quality aspects of EPER
PRTRs building on existing reporting structures: The French PRTR
EEB 2017 report ‘BURNING: THE EVIDENCE’
Presentation transcript:

Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation Bob Boyce, Senior Environmental Assessment Officer, Environmental Quality Department, Edinburgh

Introduction UK competent authorities 2007 EPRTR reporting summary UK and regional PRTRs Quality Assessment Guidance

The UK Bunkerland England Wales Northern Ireland Scotland

UK – 5 competent authorities Numbers in brackets refer to the number of 2004 EPER reporting installations. All CA except DTI will have an increase the number of installations reporting under E-PRTR. DEFRA is often the lead organisation representing the UK and the Environment Agency representing the environment agencies/competent authorities within the Commission. Scotland and Northern Ireland have different legal systems which is why they have implemented different Regulations under the IPPC Directive. One “volunteer” from SEPA or EA is appointed to collate the UK data return and submit it to the EEA. SEPA collated 2007 report.

Distribution of facilities in UK according to EPER website

UK National and Regional PRTR The UK-PRTR went live in early 2009. Public and industry consulted in PRTR development. DECC, DEFRA and NI do not have PRTRs. SEPA and the England and Wales Environment Agency (EA) have regional PRTRs. The EA-PRTR started in 1998 and SEPA’s Pollutant Release Inventory in 2002. Similar electronic data capture and public access systems. Use a common list of 215 pollutants, thresholds (much lower than E-PRTR) and activities (some capacity thresholds lower and additional activities). A UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory is available for a few pollutants. (http://www.naei.org.uk/) BRT = a company must report if they have releases above zero but below the reporting threshold, they do not report a value but BRT. A UK wide public consultation will take place in the summer of 2007 to determine what is in the UK PRTR and how it looks.

Regional PRTR The EA, SEPA and NI PRTR collect data from: All large IPPC sites, similar to E-PRTR; Sewage treatment works > 15K PE; All marine fin fish farms (no capacity limit); Major sites that use radioactivity, e.g. nuclear power plants, hospitals, research centres, universities; Off-site transfers of waste by weight. Over 5500 sites report – only half report to EPRTR. DECC, NI and DEFRA do not collect data beyond E-PRTR

Quality Assessment Procedure

Quality Assessment – Online validation Release value must be greater than threshold Last year’s release > 50% or < -50% this year AND/OR > 5 years data then > 2x standard deviation Operator must supply explanation if above is true. Operator must explain if a pollutant is added or removed or increased or decreased wrt threshold. Use of indicative lists at EC and local level Pre-populate return with indicative pollutants for new sites and last year’s submission for old sites Below Reporting Threshold (BRT) must be reported BRT we do this for three main reasons: It helps with identifying sources of pollutants It helps us determine if threshold is set correctly

Quality Assessment - Site Inspector Annual on-site inspection: check some details of PRTR reporting: Full PRTR audit when necessary. Check release data based on process equipment, production type and volume. Are any increases/decreases in reported values accurately and properly justified? Was the correct methodology used for that type of process in any measurement methods for producing release values? Was the correct methodology and parameters used in calculations or estimations for that type of process? Comparison with historical values (trends). Are all pollutants reported as BRT correct? Are there any missing pollutants? At least one annual on-site inspection will include checking of at least some aspects of PRTR reporting. A special full PRTR audit is carried at some installation each year.

Quality Assessment – Public validation Revealed: Scotland's 17 serious polluters General public includes: Other operators in sector Local pressure groups Other Local and National Government departments Non Governmental Organisations (NGO’s) Public service organisations (e.g. ENDS - Environment News Daily) and local newspapers DO NOT underestimate the passion and effectiveness of this validation group (at least in UK) Environmental Data Services (ENDS) has been a leading provider of environmental intelligence in Europe since 1978. A UK based company.

Guidance - sector specific tools and guidance Landfill: ConSim leachate estimator tool and GasSim model for estimating landfill gas emissions (free “lite” versions available) Waste water estimation tool (developed and funded by regulators and UK Water Industry) Guidance (available on website - http://www.sepa.org.uk/spri/guidance.htm) Waste Treatment, Transfer and Storage: non-landfill waste activities Combustion Activities Petroleum Activities Food & Drink Cement & Lime Chemicals Incineration Metals (ferrous and non ferrous) Paper & Pulp Quarrying and mining (in development) Waste Water – a collaborative approach between industry and regulators.

Penalties No penalties have been issued to date. UK uses Notice under IPPC Regulations to require reporting. These are separate from permit enforcement penalties. IPPC notice can be used to cover non-IPPC activities for purposes of an inventory. The Notice is served against a company, the company named on the authorisation, the chief executive is usually responsible.

Penalties UK uses an Information Notice under the PPC Regulations to collect data, penalties for non-compliance are: Under a summary conviction: Max fine of about £5,000 (7,000 euros) or Upon conviction on indictment: a fine or up to 2 years imprisonment, or both

The End Thank you