Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lexington Area TransCAD Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group Meeting Kyeil Kim, Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates,
Advertisements

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
About this presentation Target audience: Prepared for Dr. Mitsuru Saito’s BYU graduate level class. Feb Please contact Mike Brown at
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Amar Sarvepalli. 500 projects in 6-8 weeks Need VMT, VHT and More.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Development of the Idaho STDM Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Increasing Precision in Highway Volume through Adjustment of Stopping Criteria in Traffic Assignment and Number of Feedbacks Behruz Paschai, Kathy Yu,
Knoxville Regional Travel Demand Model Upgrade Program May 6, 2004 Knoxville Regional Travel Demand Model Upgrade Program May 6, 2004.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented to 13 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference prepared and presented by David.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Myriad Uses of the Ohio Statewide Travel Demand Model for Access Ohio 2040 Rob Bostrom Greg Giaimo Sashi Gandavarapu Don Vary Paul Hershkowitz May
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
ECIA A Regional Response to Local needs Travel Demand Forecasting Model for DMATS Area Chandra Ravada.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Leveraging Web-Based GIS for Managing Transportation Model Network Information TRB Planning Applications Conference May 10 th, 2011 Reno, Nevada Steve.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Generation CE331 Transportation Engineering.
FSUTMS Calibration and Validation Standards presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Robert Schiffer, AICP Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Robert G. Schiffer, AICP Thomas.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
16th TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference
Using Linked Non-Home-Based Trips in Virginia
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Leta F. Huntsinger, PhD, PE Senior Technical Principal, WSP
Determine and Assign Area Type for Network Links Using GIS Technology
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
One-way travel to two-way travel conversion.
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
TRB Application Conference
TNMUG – MPO Data Needs Discussion Knoxville Regional TPO Perspective
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model

Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model March 6, 2008

WSA’S Presentation Participants Rob Bostrom, P.E. – Project Director W. Hollis Loveday, P.E. – Project Manager Jennifer Humphreys, AICP – Lead Modeler Liza Runey, EI – Modeler

Overview Input Data Model Steps Base Year Model Calibration and Validation Future Year Models User Interface

STUDY AREA

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL how did we get there? Network Development Base Year (Existing Conditions) Forecast Year (E+C, LRP) Network Attributes Lanes, Speed, Capacity, Functional Classification AADT

BASE YEAR NETWORK

NETWORK ATTRIBUTES

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL how did we get there? TAZ Socioeconomic Data Collection Base Year (Year 2005) ESRI and Dunn & Bradstreet Forecast Year (Year 2030) Woods & Pool and Dunn & Bradstreet TAZ Socioeconomic Data Population and Dwelling Units Retail Employment and Non-Retail Employment

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES (TAZs)

THREE STEP MODEL Trip Generation Model Production and Attraction Rates Trip Distribution Model Gravity Model External Trips Traffic Assignment User Equilibrium

TRIP GENERATION MODEL Trip Production Rates (Person Trips) Trip Purpose Trip Production Rate Home Based Work (2.04 * Dwelling Units) Home Based Other (6.13 * Dwelling Units) Non-Home Based (0.72 * Dwelling Units) + (4.48 * Retail Employment) + (0.95 * Other Employment) Trip Attraction Rates (Person Trips) Trip Purpose Trip Attraction Rate Home Based Work (1.45 * Total Employment) Home Based Other (0.9 * Dwelling Units) + (9.0 * Retail Employment) + (1.20 * Other Employment) Non-Home Based (0.72 * Dwelling Units) + (4.48 * Retail Employment) + (0.95 * Other Employment) External-Internal Home Based Work External-Internal Home Based Other External-Internal Non-Home Based (0.5 * Dwelling Units) + (4.1 * Retail Employment) + (0.95 * Other Employment) Trip Generation Summary by Trip Purpose (Base Year 2005) Internal Vehicle Trips Purpose Total Internal Trips 2005 Home Based Work 127,235 Home Based Other 382,328 Non-Home Based 154,857 TOTAL 664,420

TRIP DISTRIBUTION MODEL Average Trip Length by Trip Purpose Purpose Average Trip Length (Minutes) HBW 12.26 HBO 8.47 NHB 6.87 Friction Factor Source: Kingsport Travel Demand Model

EXTERNAL TRIPS

TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT MODEL

MODEL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION

MODEL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION

MODEL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION Comparison by Functional Classification Functional Class Observations AADT 2005 Model Estimate Difference Percent Difference FHWA Goal Pass/Fail 11 - Interstate 22 419,631 405,727 12,904 3.08% 10% Pass 14 - Principal Arterial 36 626,120 653,271 27,151 4.34% 10% Pass 16 - Minor Arterial 93 754,656 710,909 43,747 5.80% 15% Pass 17 - Collector 48 155,981 156,598 617 0.40% 25% Pass 19 - Local 14 60,996 61,131 135 0.22% 25% Pass Overall RMSE – 29.34% Assign vs. Count – 1.42% Observations – 213

FORECAST YEAR MODEL (2030) Socioeconomic Data Woods and Pool Complete Economics and Demographics Database Forecasts EE Trip Forecasts TNDOT projections NCHRP 365 Traffic Assignment “No Build” “Existing plus Committed” “Long Range Plan”

FORECAST YEAR MODEL (2030) “NO BUILD” 2005 Calibrated Model 2030 NO BUILD Total Demand (vph) 603,091 931,400 Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) 112,220 193,486 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 3,856,293 6,169,519 Network Miles Traveled (No Centroid Connectors) (VMT) 3,441,494 5,546,590

FORECAST YEAR MODEL (2030) “EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED”

FORECAST YEAR MODEL (2030) “EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED” 2005 Calibrated Model 2030 NO BUILD 2030 E+C Total Demand (vpd) 603,091 931,400 Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) 112,220 193,486 190,208 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 3,856,293 6,169,519 6,161,503 Network Miles Traveled (No Centroid Connectors) (VMT) 3,441,494 5,546,590 5,539,361

FORECAST YEAR MODEL (2030) “LONG RANGE PLAN”

FORECAST YEAR MODEL (2030) “LONG RANGE PLAN” 2005 Calibrated Model 2030 NO BUILD 2030 E+C 2030 LRP Total Demand (vpd) 603,091 931,400 Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) 112,220 193,486 190,208 188,128 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 3,856,293 6,169,519 6,161,503 6,165,024 Network Miles Traveled (No Centroid Connectors) (VMT) 3,441,494 5,546,590 5,539,361 5,544,411

USER INTERFACE

USER INTERFACE

“MOVING AHEAD” Data Availability Network Attributes Socioeconomic Data Local Quality Control Agency Involvement Interagency Coordination

QUESTIONS? THANK YOU! Glenn Berry – JCMPO Manager Jeff Rawles – JCMPO Staff Bob Rock – TNDOT