IBC Review Pathway Approximate Timeline Online status Online“Sub”State

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference.
Advertisements

MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Introduction to RISe and your “My Home…” Page A User Guide for Principal Investigators and Research Staff.
The Lifecycle of an IRB Protocol in KC
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
Letter of intent By to predefined format (Word file, see guidelines) Chair Scientific Committee Coordination EO To all members of.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Kentucky Work Ready Communities Recertification Recertification updates Extension requests.
IACUC Procedures James Weiland, PhD Professor of Ophthalmology/BME IACUC Chair
O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR Welcome to the Research Navigator Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Learning.
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator HRPP 101, September 2010.
HOW TO SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO A PROJECT THAT HAS ALREADY RECEIVED IRB APPROVAL Submitting an Amendment.
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator Local Accountability Meeting June 2011.
CEUs: Delivering Quality Programs Across Texas Presented by Bret Hendricks and Bobbie Lawrence.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Lifespan 1 Submission Process to the IRB part 2 Revisions to Protocol.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training IRB Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development Electronic.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Safety Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development Electronic.
Planning and Budget Committee May 15, Agenda Current Financial Position Changes in Recurring and One-time Dollars for FY16 FY16 Budget Timeline.
ME 3.0 to ME 5.0 ME3.0 review scheduled during the Joint NDSWG/NATF meeting in July. There were approximately 180 comments on the ME3.0 paper. Deadline.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
CayuseIRB A Quick Start Guide for IRB, IACUC, and IBC Researchers
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Ray Street Academy Home of the “Lions”
Introduction to the Human Research Protections Office (HRPO)
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Graduate Projects Meeting February 10, 2017 Agenda
Curriculum Development at KCC
What’s Changing in Research Administration?
How to Complete IRB Member Review
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Click Training Conflict of Interest (COI) Module
Submission and Approval of Graduate Student Documents
MRHP – REB Member Tutorial
How to Complete IRB Member Review
Approving Timesheets.
IBC REGISTRATION - Overview
Welcome to the Zoom Session, Introduction to the New IRB Software System: ClickTM Research Compliance Zoom Session Structure 45 minutes for the presentation.
Top Ten eIRB Application Mistakes
Staff EPAF Notifications
Click Training IACUC Module
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
Things are getting SERIOUS
Click Training Agreements Module
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
School Improvement October 2016.
PROCESSING SPONSORED PROPOSALS AT THE JOHN F
HREC Operating Procedures for the Review of Low and Moderate to High Risk Projects
AURA IBC Fundamentals.
Position Descriptions
Mark S. Orloff, MD Regional Councillor
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
ADMIT Pools & Workflow.
Common Rule.
Life of a Dossier Redelegated Merit Non-Redelegated Merit
CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
Cayuse IRB - Initial Training
Click on the Biosafety tab to view all your Biosafety applications.
HERE IBC Protocol RENEWAL Last 4 MMDD
Marlon F. Levy, MD Regional Councillor
Elizabeth A. Pomfret, MD, PhD Regional Councillor
Region 8 Meeting Harvey Solomon, MD
USF Research Integrity & Compliance
Click Training Safety Module
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) OVERVIEW
HERE IBC Protocol RENEWAL
Presentation transcript:

IBC Review Pathway Approximate Timeline Online status Online“Sub”State Pre-Submission: The application has NOT yet been submitted to the IBC NOTE: Applications can only be submitted by the PI Time is dependent upon investigator schedule Investigator must submit Office Review –Coordinator Review Submission is previewed by office staff for review criteria Submission is assigned to committee reviewers by office staff 1-3 days Office Review –Member Review Submission evaluated for safety by Designated Reviewers Review comments are returned to the IBC Office Average time of review is 9 days Office Review –Clarification Requested Review comments are collated and sent to the investigator for clarification or edits 1-3 days Investigator must re-submit Committee Review Submission is assigned to an upcoming IBC meeting agenda Note: All IBC members review protocols assigned to agendas Time dependent on proximity to next scheduled IBC meeting Continue

IBC Review Pathway Approximate Timeline Online“Sub”State Online status Continued from previous Approximate Timeline Online“Sub”State Online status IBC Meetings : NIH Guidelines requires IBC review and approval at meetings IBC meeting dates are posted on the IBC website IBC meetings are open and minutes are accessible by public Date of the scheduled IBC Meeting Post-Review: Post-Review: administrative follow-up and record maintenance Chair Letter review: Correspondence review by IBC Chair 1-3 days Correspondence sent by system notification Post-Review –Modifications Required IBC requires edits or action to correct safety issues Committee comments are sent to the Investigator Approval after minor edits Requires re-review by IBC Major safety issues- denied Investigator must re-submit Post-Review: Post-Review: administrative follow-up and record maintenance Chair Letter review: Correspondence review by IBC Chair 1-3 days 1-7 days Correspondence sent by system notification Review Complete Active protocol - research may begin Lapsed/Closed or Discarded – research is discontinued OR