Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management Ordinance Case No. PH-ORD-041 Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection.
Advertisements

UC Berkeley Per F. Peterson Professor Department of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Berkeley California Council on Science and Technology.
Large scale blending of LLRW – Issued interim guidance in 3/2011 LLRW Storage Guidance Working Group – Issued Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) on storage.
Regulation of Low Level Waste Management
IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Module L-051 General Concepts of Exercises to Test Preparedness Lecture.
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.8 Site selection for hazardous waste treatment facilities.
Former NAS Moffett Field
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Checking & Corrective Action
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
MCM 5 – Post-Construction Runoff Control (DRAFT) YES NO Post-construction stormwater management for that construction activity is in compliance with MCM5.
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
J-Field Edgewood Aberdeen Proving Ground. Description From 1940 to 1970s, the Army disposed of chemical agents, high explosives and chemical wastes. APG.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Part III Solid Waste Engineering
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Presentation on recent IAEA activities on RWM Y. Kumano WES / NSRW
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
NRC Decommissioning Activities for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Tritium: Fleet-Wide Assessment Program Zigmund A. Karpa Director Environmental and Regulatory Affairs.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation NYSDEC Public Meeting September 12, 2013 Brooklyn Navy Yard, Building 92 Former Kent Avenue Site 500 Kent.
Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposition Discussion Meeting of the National Governors’ Association April 12, 2001 U. S. Department of Energy.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
Phase 1 Studies Update Quarterly Public Meeting May 22, 2013.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
One Project. One Team. One Goal.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
U. S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project 18096_1 HLW Project Status Bryan Bower, DOE WVDP Denis Koutsandreas, DOE EM HQ Ron Farchmin,
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
U.S Regulatory Process for Uranium Production Facility Licensing and Operation Daniel M. Gillen.
Waste Management Working Group CTMA Point Clear, AL W. T. (Sonny) Goldston EnergySolutions Working Group Chair July 6 - 9, 2015.
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Plan What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) Calendar Year 2011 West Valley Demonstration Project Presented by: John Rendall, Regulatory Strategy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
West Valley Demonstration Project Environmental Characterization Services Contract Update November 14, 2012 Zintars Z. Zadins, Ph.d. U.S.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Phase I Decommissioning Project Update West Valley Demonstration Project Presented by: Bryan Bower, Department of Energy November 14, 2012.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
1 West Valley Demonstration Project FY 2014 Budget Briefing Bryan C. Bower May 22, 2013.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
The Yucca Mountain Repository for Nuclear Waste June Edward F. Sproat III Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department.
Office of Legacy Management Land Transfer and Reuse November 2006 Steven R. Schiesswohl Senior Realty Officer, Office of Legacy Management.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
-EL ABBARI Younes, FADIL Najib (CNESTEN) -SADIQ Younes (AMSSNuR)
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
NDA Draft Strategy.
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Status of Disposal Capabilities for Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Theresa J. Kliczewski GTCC EIS Document Manager Office of.
Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force
Office of Waste Disposal Office of Environmental Management
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Presentation transcript:

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Decommissioning and/or Long-Term Stewardship at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and the Western New York Nuclear Service Center (WNYNSC) (DOE/EIS-0226) Bryan Bower DOE Director West Valley Demonstration Project WVDP Quarterly Public Meeting, January 23, 2008

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_2 Core Team Members U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_3 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Schedule* Interim End State Decontaminate Main Plant Process Building (MPPB) and make demolition-ready Ship legacy waste Remove ancillary facilities Make Remote Handled Waste (RHWF) and Vitrification facilities demolition-ready Cover NRC-licensed Disposal Area (NDA) Dry Waste Tank Farm (WTF) Mitigate North Plateau Groundwater (NPGW) Plume Evaluate relocation of HLW canisters to new on-site storage EIS Actions Major Components of EIS Scope Lagoons Remote Handled Waste Facility Vitrification Facility Main Plant Process Building WTF HLW Canisters NDA and State-licensed Disposal Area (SDA) NPGW Plume Cooperating Agency review of Draft EIS 2009 Six-month public review of DEIS Record of Decision Decommissioning Plan (DP) to NRC Revised DP to NRC *Tentative proposed accelerated schedule Consideration of Public Comments FEIS

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_4 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Starting Point Conditions NDA Cap and Barrier Wall Permeable Reactive Barrier Permeable Treatment Wall Tank and Vault Drying System Vitrification Facility Demolition-Ready Remote Handled Waste Facility Demolition-Ready MPPB Demolition-Ready SDA Cap and Barrier Wall

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_5 Draft Decommissioning EIS Purpose:Evaluate the range of reasonable alternatives for decommissioning and/or long-term stewardship of the WVDP and WNYNSC Key Points An EIS is an analytical document that analyzes and compares potential environmental impacts of alternatives The EIS (study) does not determine the decision Regulatory requirements are discussed in the EIS, but compliance is not determined

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_6 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Alternatives Four Alternatives Defined –Site-wide Removal –Site-wide Close In-place –No Action –Phased Decision-Making Recommended by Core Team as Preferred Alternative

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_7 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Site-Wide Removal Alternative Action: Removal of all wastes, contaminated facilities and soils/sediments Key Points MPPB, NDA, SDA, WTF and all contaminated soils/sediments above levels that would restrict land use would be demolished, exhumed, removed Wastes for which there is no available disposal option would be stored on site awaiting shipment

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_8 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Site-Wide Close In-Place Alternative Action: Close existing facilities and contamination in current locations with use of engineered barriers for containment Key Points Analysis of both ongoing institutional controls and loss of institutional controls at 100 years would be conducted For regulatory purposes, would also evaluate loss of institutional control at time = 0 Non-impacted areas of the WNYNSC could be considered for release without restrictions

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_9 Draft Decommissioning EIS: No Action Alternative (Continuing Operations) Action: No decommissioning actions would be taken; active monitoring and maintenance would continue Key Points This alternative is a procedural NEPA/SEQRA requirement Evaluation would begin with Interim End State actions completed Analysis of both long-term institutional controls and loss of institutional controls at 100 years would be conducted

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_10 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Action: Removal of most WVDP facilities; identification and completion of activities to support future decisions on exhumation or in-place closure of remaining WVDP facilities (phased decommissioning); and active on-site management of SDA for up to 30 years Key Points Two-phase decision process with definite schedule for completion First decision would identify removal actions and assessment activities to support future decisions on the WTF, NPGW Plume, and NDA First decision would identify management strategy for SDA Integration of decisions and actions over time is challenging, but essential to progressing toward WVDP completion

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_11 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Phase 1 would include both actions and assessments (studies) –Proposed Phase 1 Actions (~2011 – 2018) Construct new on-site storage facility for High-Level Waste (HLW) canisters; move the 275 canisters of solidified HLW to a new on-site storage facility Remove the Main Plant Process Building including below-grade sections and the source area of the North Plateau Ground Water Plume Removal of Liquid Low-Level Waste Water Treatment Facility, lagoons and all facilities not needed to maintain: Waste Tank Farm, North Plateau Groundwater Plume, NRC-licensed Disposal Area and general site monitoring and maintenance. Further characterize and evaluate site surface soils to identify and remove areas of higher contamination.

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_12 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_13 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Rationale for Proposed Phase 1 Actions –Relocating HLW canisters would place them in cost-effective configuration, ready for shipment –Removal of MPPB would eliminate highly-contaminated 40+ year- old facility and allow removal of contaminated soil (i.e. the source area of the NPGW Plume) under and around the MPPB –Reduction in facilities would allow removal of the radioactive waste water treatment system and lagoons precluding future spread of contamination from lagoon sediments –Removal of areas of higher surface soil contamination would advance overall site soil management

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_14 Draft Decommissioning EIS: After Phase 1 Actions The following facilities/areas would remain and would continue under active management –WTF –NDA, SDA –Remaining contained portion of the contaminated NPGW Plume –Areas of low-level surface soil contamination –Canisters containing HLW solidified in glass –Waste without off-site disposal options

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_15 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Site After Phase 1 Actions Decommissioning decisions on the remaining WVDP facilities/areas would await further assessments Potential Location of HLW Canister Storage

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_16 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Proposed Phase 1 Assessments –A number of activities are proposed to support future decisions on exhumation or in-place closure of the WTF, NDA and remaining portion of NPGW Plume Site-specific erosion data collection Further evaluation of long-term landscape evolution modeling and application to the West Valley site Evaluation of engineered barriers Monitoring and evaluation of exhumation technologies Monitoring and evaluation of potential disposal pathways for site wastes Ongoing site performance evaluations

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_17 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Ongoing Assessment Period –An assessment period is proposed to begin with issuance of the Record of Decision. Evaluations would be conducted during this period and reviews of the WTF, NDA, SDA and remaining portion of contained NPGW Plume would be conducted every five years, in association with: Completion of DOE supplement analysis process RCRA permit renewal (DOE, NYSERDA, NYSDEC) SDA permits and license renewal (NYSERDA, NYSDEC, NYSDOH)

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_18 Draft Decommissioning EIS: Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Ongoing Assessment Period (continued) –Site monitoring and maintenance would continue throughout the assessment period A decommissioning decision (Phase 2) for the WTF and NDA and contained portion of NPGW Plume would be made no later than 30 years after the Phase 1 Record of Decision