Session One – NSF Grants 101 May 23, :00 am – 12:00 pm EST

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ALLIANCE FOR GRADUATE EDUCATION AND PROFESSIORIATE PROGRAM (AGEP) CONFERENCE NSF Division of Grants & Agreements Chicago, Illinois March 18-21, 2009.
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
DIRECT BENEFITS OF AN INDIRECT COST RATE
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Managing Your Grant: A Roadmap to the Finish Line Carol Gelormine Manager of Grant Accounting Division of Finance & Treasury Catherine Bruno Post-Award.
Alliance Meeting May 18, 2006 National Science Foundation Division of Grants and Agreements Al Wilson, Grants Management Specialist (703)
Life Cycle of an Award1 Office of Sponsored Programs Post-Award Overview of Award Management/ Life Cycle of an Award.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
Grants Pre Award Workshop Barnard College “From A to F (Abstract to Funding)” Fall 2010.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
Biological Sciences Directorate Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management Office of the General Counsel.
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Pathway to Success December 16, 2013 MSP Annual Conference Division of Grants and Agreements.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Close-Outs Presented by Stacy Tedder NOAA Grants Management Division January 31,
Introduction to The Grant Center Fitchburg State University.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Submitting to the NIH ERA Empowerment Series MAY 2014.
National Science Foundation Overview. Agenda Our Legacy: About NSF Our Work: Programs & The Merit Review Process Our Opportunities: Working at the NSF.
NSF Early Career Award Submission Preparation March 21, 2014 Prepared by: Shelly Baczkowski
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgets & submitting your proposal –To give an overview of the guidelines and fundamentals of a proposal.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Cost Sharing. Objectives Review roles and responsibilities Facilitate pro-active, continuous monitoring of cost share commitments Review Cost Share Summary.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP P RESENTED BY : C ATHERINE S TRESING S USANNE S TAMM A WARDS.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
SUBMITTING PROPOSALS AFTER LEGAL CLOSE If you plan to collaborate with VUMC investigators, you will need to include a VUMC proposal for an outgoing billing.
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SUBMISSION FYAP May 5, 2016 Julie Wammack Sponsored Research Administration.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
AISL PI Conference February 29, 2016 Division of Grants and Agreements.
1 Federal Cost Recoveries Georgia Fiscal Management Council October 3, :30pm – 3:30pm.
Post-Award Grant Administration Presented by: Sponsored Program Accounting Updated: Fiscal Year 2014.
Phase II Financial Review Guidance
Building A Budget Jenn Garye, Office of the VP for Research
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Presented by Urmila Bajaj January 26, 2017
Center for Excellence in Applied Computational Science and Engineering
Congratulations - You Have a Grant! Now What?!
KSU Sponsored Projects Overview
Proposal Routing Overview
Sponsored Programs (SP)
JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY JEOPARDY.
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
HBCU-UP PI/PD CONFERENCE Bowie State University
Office of Sponsored Programs
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Session Three – Post Award Management May 25, 2018
Introduction to Federal Funding
Grants Management 101 Part A
Overview of a typical grant budget
Introduction to Indirect Costs Claiming Your “Fair Share”
Session Two – Participant Support Costs (PSCs) May 24, 2018
Overview of a typical grant budget
DGCA Breakfast Briefing
Participant Support Costs
Post-Award Grant Administration
SPONSORED PROGRAM SERVICES OVERVIEW
I want to submit a grant. What do I do?
Phase II Review Process:
Results of NSF Data Analytics and Other Audits
Post-Award Grant Administration
Presentation transcript:

Session One – NSF Grants 101 May 23, 2018 11:00 am – 12:00 pm EST Empowerment through knowledge and engagement – understanding the NSF processes Session One – NSF Grants 101 May 23, 2018 11:00 am – 12:00 pm EST

Introductions Clytrice Watson, Program Officer of the HBCU-UP Program, Education and Human Resource Directorate, Division of Human Resource Development (EHR/HRD) Rashawn Farrior, Team Lead, Education and Human Resources Directorate (EHR) Jannele Gosey, Grants Management Specialist for the Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) and the Division of Human Resource Development (HRD)

agenda What is the National Science Foundation? Statistics Proposal & Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Roles and Relationships New Awardee/Updated Performer Information Delay of Award Indirect Costs and Calculations Notification of Award Pathways to Success Q & A

What is the national science foundation? The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950 "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense..." NSF is vital because we support basic research and people to create knowledge that transforms the future. This type of support: Is a primary driver of the U.S. economy Enhances the nation's security Advances knowledge to sustain global leadership With an annual budget of $7.8 billion (FY 2018), we are the funding source for approximately 27 percent of the total federal budget for basic research conducted at U.S. colleges and universities. In many fields such as mathematics, computer science and the social sciences, NSF is the major source of federal backing.

NSF is located at 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria VA 22314 The NSF is organized into: 2 Offices  9 Divisions 7 Directorates  32 Divisions For a complete listing of the Directorates and Divisions please visit www.nsf.gov The National Science Board oversees the NSF.

Statistics – Fiscal year 2017

Proposal & Award Policies and Procedures guide NSF 18-1

What is your role? Principal Investigator (PI) – means the individual(s) designated by the proposer, and approved by NSF, who will be responsible for the scientific or technical direction of the project. The PI and any identified Co-PIs, however, will be jointly responsible for submission of the requisite project reports. Program Officer (PO) – The NSF program officer reviews the proposal and analyzes the input received from the external reviewers. After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the program officer makes an "award" or "decline" recommendation to the division director Grants Management Specialist/Grants Officer – A DGA officer reviews the recommendation from the program division/office for business, financial and policy implications, and the processing and issuance of a grant or cooperative agreement. DGA generally makes awards to academic institutions within 30 days after the program division/office makes its recommendation. Office of Sponsored Research (OSP)/ Sponsored Research Officer (SPO) - Full responsibility for the conduct of project activity and for adhering to the award conditions. Must ensure that the institution is in compliance to all applicable Federal requirements and to manage all expenditures and actions prudently. And also ensures that expenditures are allowable, allocable, and reasonable.

Working relationships

Division of grants and agreements (dga) What Kind of Awards are Issued by DGA? Assistance Awards - the principal purpose of which is to transfer anything of value from NSF to the grantee for them to carry out a public purpose; and not to acquire property or services for NSF’s direct benefit or use. Grants (Standard and Continuing) Cooperative Agreements Fellowships How Many Actions Does DGA Process? DGA typically approves approximately 17,000 funded actions, and 4,000 non- funded actions each year.

Dga’s role in the award process

New awardee and updated performer information New Awardee – A new awardee is an institution (the award is made to the institution, not the PI) that has never received an NSF grant award. Before an NSF award is made to a New Awardee institution, a review is completed by DGA (if awarded amount will be $225K or under) or NSF’s Cost Analysis and Pre Award Branch (CAAP) (if awarded is over $225K) to verify the accounting system capability and the institution’s financial viability to be able to handle the federal funding. Updated Performer – An institution that has received NSF awards, but hasn’t had an award in 5 years (end date of last award).

New awardee/updated performer package The New Awardee/Updated Performer Package will be requested from the Office of Sponsored Research in the form of an email and the required documents are to be returned within 15 days. Examples of information requested are: Copy of the Project Cost Ledger Institutions policies and procedures on Participant Support, Allowability of Costs and Subawards Last 2 years of financial statements Once your information is received, it can take up to 60 days for the CAAP decision to be made.

The DGA Review Process – items that WILL delay processing Federally Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate (NICRA) – Upon completing your budget, you must use your current NICRA for your institution and any subawards. If you or your subaward doesn’t not have a rate, you (they) can use the 10% de minimis rate (Modified Total Direct Cost). Budget and Justification Issues – Unallowable costs usually found in Budget Line Items F. Participant Support and G. 6. Other Direct Costs that aren’t fully described in the budget justification. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Documentation – This documentation NEEDS to be submitted before the Proposal can receive funding.

Indirect cost calculation Please understand the terms of your NICRA, as it explains what your rate is along with the base. Base – Salaries and Wages; Salaries, Wages, and Fringe Benefits; or Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC). If your base is Salaries and Wages and your indirect cost rate is 35%. Then you would simply multiply the total for Salaries and Wages by 35% and the answer is the indirect cost amount. If your base is Salaries, Wages, and Fringe Benefits and your indirect cost rate is 35%. Then you would simply multiply the total for Salaries, Wages, and Fringe Benefits by 35% and the answer is the indirect cost amount.

Indirect cost calculation – modified total direct costs (mtdc) If you have a MTDC base rate agreement – you must exclude: participant support equipment in excess of $5,000 you will pay indirect costs for subawards the first $25K of each subaward (regardless of the length of the award), the remaining amount is excluded Tuition May be other exclusions, please refer to your rate agreement

Sample mtdc indirect cost calculation You have been awarded a 5 year grant with the following details: Indirect Cost rate is 45%, Equipment costs $20K, 2 subawards (1 for 100K and the other for $30K), Participant Support Costs $150K, and tuition costs (not participant support) $30K. Your current total direct costs on your budget (prior to calculation) is at $1M. Total direct costs - $1M Subtract equipment ($20K) Subtract subaward excess ($80K) Subtract participant support (150K) Subtract tuition costs ($30K) $720,000 X 45% = $324,000 (indirect cost amount)

Notification of award Award Letter by email Solicitation 16 – 538 Research Terms and Conditions (RTCs), occasional special conditions, and other documents incorporated by reference

Pathways to success! Focus on the objectives of the project/program; Effective communication between everyone involved; Good accounting practices; Official records

Jannele Gosey, jgosey@nsf.gov, 703-292-4445 CONTACT INFORMATION Jannele Gosey, jgosey@nsf.gov, 703-292-4445

ASK EARLY, ASK OFTEN!