Assessment Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alaskas English Language Proficiency Standards 2005 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development February 8, 2006.
Advertisements

Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
Agenda CCR Assessment Updates Assessment Support for Educators Assessments and Beyond Accountability Updates 1.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
ISTEP+ IREAD3 February 13, 2013 Suncrest Elementary.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools and Keystone Exams PAIUCC Meeting, September 17, 2010 PAIUCC Meeting Classroom Diagnostic Tools and.
ALTERNATE/ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS VGLA AND VMAST UPDATES VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST Regional Administrators Update Training.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
Indiana Education Roundtable: K-12 Education Assessments Presentation to the Indiana Education Roundtable Monday, June 23,
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Montgomery County Schools August 5, 2013.
How to Interpret and Use Standards of Learning (SOL) and ACCESS for ELLs® Data to Make Instructional Decisions for English Learners.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination Program Update Bilingual.
New York State Education Department Understanding The Process: Science Assessments and the New York State Learning Standards.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
1 Sarah McManus and Hope Tesh-Blum North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section North Carolina High.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES January OSPI agency priorities and organization chart.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
Testing Landscape: PSSA, Keystone Exams, Project- Based Assessment and Classroom Diagnostic Tools December 9, 2013.
The latest and greatest STAAR © 2011 REGION XIII.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011 High School.
NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessments of: English Language Arts/Reading 3  8, Mathematics 3  8, and Science 5 & 8 English II, Math I, and Biology at Grade.
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
Charter District Participation in the Student Assessment Program Lisa Cottle, Director of Test Administration Student Assessment Division Texas Education.
END OF GRADE (EOG) AND END OF COURSE (EOC) SPRING 2016 MOSSY CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL PARENT MEETING MARCH 24,
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
Minnesota Assessment System Update “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
WIDA ACCESS Testing Information Session & Community Literacy Resources Parents as Educational Partners Tuesday, January 13, 2015 Jonathan Hudgens- WIDA.
Parent Academy September 17, 2016
2017 Georgia Milestones Update
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
State Testing IREAD and ISTEP+ Lake Station Schools Testing Team:
MRs. J.Fundora Air Base K-8 Center November 30th, 2016
New Developments in NYS Assessments
State Testing IREAD and ISTEP+ Lake Station Schools Testing Team:
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards District Name Date, 2016.
Helping your Child Prepare for Testing
Assessment Information
DOE Panel INPAC.
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment Performance Task
ESL Data-Driven Instruction
End of Course Exams Overview
PARCC Math Options Stephanie Boyd, PARCC Consultant
M-Step Overview, Practice and Instructional Implications
Classroom Diagnostic Tools Pennsylvania Department of Education
INFORMATIONAL SESSION
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Updates on Next-Generation MCAS and Planning for the High School Competency Determination Standard Meeting of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
English Language Proficiency Assessment
E L P A Last updated: 08/31/09.
E L P A Last updated: 08/31/09.
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
“Read by Grade Three” Law
English Language Proficiency Assessment
What it IS, What it means, What it Offers
New Assessments and Accommodations
EOG Retests Summer 2016 EOG Retest Administrations resume with the Summer 2016 Retest as follows: May 16 – July 22, 2016 For students requiring a retest.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Overview

2017-18

ISTEP+ (Grades 3-8 and 10) Continues for 2017-18 with few changes Thoughtful transition to online for 2018-19; expectations for more online assessment in 2017-18 Delaying released items to allow for delivery of solid pool and breach form Improvements for 2017-18 NEW Manual Configurations NEW Science Test Blueprints and Item Specs Practice Test Sessions: Now Preloaded by Pearson Updated Setting: Calculator Accommodation Updated Process: Student Transfers in PearsonAccessNext  

Updates: Instructional Supports ISTEP+ Grade 10 Blueprints https://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/assessment/grade-10-ela-public-facing-blueprint-final.pdf October 6 ISTEP+ Passage Specifications Blank Tutorial Online Form October 13 ISTEP+ Grade 10 Annotations ISTEP+ Grade 10 Specifications November 17 Moodle course (Scoring and rubric analysis)-Secondary November 13 Moodle course (Scoring and rubric analysis)-Elementary December 1 Moodle course (Item development, blueprints, and specifications) February 1

IREAD-3 (Grade 3) The purpose of IREAD-3 is to measure foundational reading standards through grade three. IREAD-3 is a state requirement: HEA 1367 (Spring 2010 PL 109) IREAD-3 consists of Multiple-Choice items only Students who do not pass IREAD-3 in the spring Will have a summer retest opportunity Students who do not pass IREAD-3 in the spring or the summer Will continue to receive instruction in Grade 3 Reading Will participate in the IREAD-3 retest For these students, it is the responsibility of the local school to design a program that meets their learning needs and to determine classroom assignments.

Remediation: Guidance for Schools For students who do not achieve a passing score on IREAD-3 and are not eligible for a Good Cause Exemption, schools should design a program that meets the learning needs of individual students and make decisions regarding organization of students for instruction. Local flexibility for this includes: Retention in the traditional sense (i.e., receiving all content instruction at Grade 3 level in a Grade 3 classroom). The student would participate in Grade 3 ISTEP+ in all subject areas and the IREAD-3 retest. Providing Grade 4 instruction in some subject areas (e.g., mathematics). The school must decide if the student would participate in Grade 3 ISTEP+ in all subject areas or Grade 4 ISTEP+ in all subject areas. The student would also participate in the IREAD-3 retest. Providing instruction in all content areas (including reading/literacy) at a Grade 4 level in a Grade 4 classroom, in addition to the Grade 3 reading/literacy instruction. The school must decide if the student would participate in Grade 3 ISTEP+ in all subject areas or Grade 4 ISTEP+ in all subject areas. The student would also participate in the IREAD-3 retest. Local decisions should be based on a student’s performance on IREAD-3 and other local assessment data collected regarding the learning needs of each student. The local school is required to provide additional interventions for a student who does not pass IREAD-3. The interventions should be determined locally; that is, the content, structure, and duration of the necessary interventions provided should be based on the instructional needs of the individual student. This slide provides guidance for schools.

Indiana’s Alternate Assessment (ISTAR) The ISTAR assessments are: Delivered online Student interactive Administered individually The content assessed: Grades 3-8, 10: English/Language Arts, Mathematics Grades 4, 6, 10: Science Grades 5, 7: Social Studies Part 1 (January 15 – February 16, 2018) Placement test; addresses standards taught in the first half of the year Includes items at all three tier levels Results place students into one of three tiers Low/medium/high structural level items Part 2 (April 16 – May 18, 2018) Student will be assigned a Tier 1, 2 or 3 test form. Assesses standards that are part of instruction during second half of the school year

ISTEP+ ECAs (based on 2000/2006) Current Graduation requirement for 12th graders in English 10 and Algebra I The Algebra I ECA is based on standards adopted in 2000; the English 10 ECA is based on standards adopted in 2006. 2017-2018 School Year: English 10 & Algebra I Graduation examination for the remaining class of 2018. 2018-2019 School Year: English 10 & Algebra I This is the last year that the ECAs will be available to students and adults.

WIDA English language proficiency assessment for K-12 students W-APT WIDA-ACCESS Placement Test Provides an indicator of a student’s language proficiency level (1-6) on the WIDA continuum Changing to WIDA Screener for 2017-18 school year Given to students within 30 calendar days of the beginning of the school year or within 2 weeks of enrollment if a student enrolls later in the school year WIDA ACCESS English language proficiency assessment Four Domains: Listening, Speaking, Reading, & Writing Six week testing window beginning January 8-February 23 Alternate ACCESS Available for students with significant cognitive disabilities

Increased Focus on Test Security Goals Deliver accommodations with fidelity Utilize standard protocols and prepare in advance Limit coaching and reviewing student responses Thoughtful practices limit Undetermined scores.

Indiana’s Alternate Assessment (ISTAR) Changes coming for ISTAR Development of RFP to align to ILEARN Under final review this week Approval for release at November State Board meeting

2018-19

HEA 1003 Established ILEARN assessment system Allows State Board to define graduation pathways Promotes assessment literacy

Types of Assessment Summative Assessment = Assessment of Learning This spectrum demonstrates the wide variety of assessments that should be present in a classroom. Each type of assessment is important and can be used for different purposes. Summative Assessment = Assessment of Learning Formative Assessment = Assessment for Learning

Assessment Development Process Blueprint & Specifications Developed Passages/Items Written Review & Editing Committee Content, Bias and Accessibility Reviews Scoring and Data Review for Field Test Items Scoring and Statistical Analysis for Operational Items Field Test (embedded or standalone) Form Construction (operational and field test items) The flow chart highlights the key steps in assessment development. Most of these steps take place annually, with the exception of standard setting. Standard setting only occurs if there is a new test blueprint or the academic standards have changed. -Blueprints are similar for assessment as they are in the architectural industry. They serve as the basis for defining key details for the assessment including how the standards will be reported by reporting categories and how they are prioritized by overall counts and percentages on the assessment. Specifications, like their name, provide more specific information for item writers about how the items must be written to ensure alignment on the assessment. These often include Depth of Knowledge, limits of the standards for a high-stakes assessment, and content relevant vocabulary that should be expected on the high stakes assessment. Educators are involved in the formulation of these documents. Typically, 8-10 educators participate for each grade and content area. -Item development-this is typically conducted by vendors and managed by the department of education using blueprints and item specifications as a guide. The number of items vary each year based on deficiencies in the item pool and to address those areas of greatest need. -The Indiana Department of Education spends several review cycles working with the vendor to refine the passages recommended or items to ensure alignment to the academic standards. -The passages or items transition to committee reviews following the department review. Educators are involved in review committees. Typically, 8-10 educators participate for each grade and content area. The committees use a quality checklist to determine if the items meet the defined criteria. -For ILEARN, we may have the option to license an existing pool. In this case, the items (or representative sample) would be reviewed by the department and Indiana educators. -Once the passages and items are approved during the committee review, form construction begins. During form construction, operational and field test items are placed into forms to ensure consistency from one administration to another in terms of test difficulty. During form construction, the department must decide whether field test items are embedded or standalone. -Operational and field test items are analyzed following each administration. Operational items that perform differently than expected or do not meet the statistical criteria are removed suppressed from the student’s score. -Field test items continue to scoring and rangefinding and then data review, where the department and vendor define expectations for scoring and then review the statistical parameters for the items and determine if they can move into the operational pool for future use. Once approved, these items move into the pool for the following administration. In the future, educators will also review items for data quality. -Standard setting occurs during the first operational cycle for an assessment. It only occurs again if the assessment has been in place for some time, the blueprints have been revised or the content standards have changed. -Following the operational administration and standard setting if applicable, score reports are available. Field Test Items Move to Operational Pool Operational Administration Standard Setting* Score Reports *Standard setting needed when transitioning blueprints or standards. https://youtu.be/OTDivYR44-8

ILEARN Beginning in 2018-19 IDOE is negotiating contract with American Institutes for Research (AIR) Pending contract execution, work will begin in December or January

AIR Assessment Not-for-profit Statewide assessments Online adaptive testing Gen Education, Alternate, English Proficiency Assessments

How is ILEARN the same? Same IN academic standards Same content areas (ELA, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies) A graduation requirement exists An accountability component exists Utilize technology for assessment

How is ILEARN the same? Same IN academic standards Same content areas (ELA, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies) A graduation requirement exists An accountability component exists Utilize technology for assessment

How is ILEARN different? Utilizing computer adaptive testing (CAT) and technology as the primary mode for assessment for all item types Additional accommodations and student supports All reporting complete by July 1 Single test window Revised cut scores New blueprints and specifications

Graduation Pathways Recommendations approved by panel on November 7. State Board work session on December 5. Potential vote on December 6.

Next Steps Contribute to conversations regarding graduation pathways Develop scope of work related to potential pathways Continue work for the 2019 assessment

Next Steps Begin work on assessment: Develop a blueprint with IN educators based on our standards Reporting Categories Appropriate distribution How much is number sense v. geometry v. stats… https://youtu.be/DI9gEW7ayD4 Develop test and item specifications with IN educators Considers how the standards can be assessed through different types of items Which standards can be assessed via MC, Open-ended… New development of items that is needed to fulfill the blueprint Delivered operationally in 2018-19

Next Steps Educators will be involved in every step of the process to develop the new assessment Blueprints, specifications, development, cut scores are all based on feedback and recommendations from educators

Recruitment Educators are needed throughout the process for development. Once contract is executed, educators will be recruited for the following: Blueprints Item specifications Item audit Item review Standard setting