San Marcos & Texas State

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council 2007 SRFB & PSAR Grants Project Subcommittee Report & Recommendations July 19, 2007.

Advertisements

Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.

Implementing Committee Meeting May 15 th, 2014 New Braunfels MS4 program and the HCP 1.

Timeline of Key Milestones and Dates DateKey Milestone February 2007Washtenaw County Drain Commissioner’s Office authorizes a project to identify opportunities.

LENTIC CHECKLIST. NATURAL RIPARIAN RESOURCES LENTIC CHECKLIST HYDROLOGIC.

CITY OF SAN MARCOS/TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY 2015 WORK PLAN BUDGETED CONSERVATION MEASURES.

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup. On March 20 th the Implementing Committee created the 2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup due to the impending drought and.

Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.

Rain Gardens: A proposal by the Accept the Greener Challenge Club.

Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan CAC Meeting 2 - Implementation.

Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Why watersheds? ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.

Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.

Applied Research (HCP Sections & ) Nathan Pence Bob Hall.

City of New Braunfels Edwards Aquifer and the Habitat Conservation Plan HCP Implementing Committee May 29,

Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions CAC Meeting #3 July 30, 2012.

Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.

Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.

Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.

New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.

Comprehensive Lakes Plan The Next Phase – Implementation 10/5/20151R.W. Garrett 19 slides Improving Storm Water Management.

Preliminary Nine Element Plan for Lake Conway–Point Remove Watershed and an Urban Watershed Plan for Little Creek- Palarm Creek Sub-Watershed.

The Potential Benefits of Greenroofs in Waller Creek Watershed Katherine Jashinski GIS in Water Resources December 1, 2009.

Stakeholder Committee’s Role. The Stakeholder Committee’s role in Adaptive Management Decision process (AMP) and the HCP Program as follows: Per Funding.

Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.

2015 HCP Work Plan Schedule Tuesday, June 3 rd Submit all comments to HCP Program Manager. Wednesday, June 4 th EAHCP Staff will distribute comments to.

Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.

Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.

2014 Drought Outreach Workgroup Introduction.

Trash Reduction Strategies in the Sligo Creek Watershed Ed Murtagh, Friends of Sligo Creek & Debbie Veliz, Izaak Walton League of America.

By: Rick Ayers Yates County Soil & Water Conservation District

SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Understanding Sedimentation and Land Use Cover Relationships in the Lake Sidney Lanier Watershed Russell A.

Section 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Grants. Mission --- protect the quality of Nebraska’s water resources from nonpoint source pollution and improve.

1 Poseidon Resources (Channelside), LLC Carlsbad Desalination Project Marine Life Mitigation Plan (MLMP) Marine Life Mitigation Site Selection and Preliminary.

Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.

Take & Incidental Take Permit Take: means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in such conduct.

Department of Public Works Submittal of Comments to the County of Los Angeles on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and Proposed Alternatives for the.

JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.

Item W16a February 8, 2012 CCC Hearing A-6-OCN (Altman) 1823 South Pacific Street City of Oceanside.

1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.

Line 9 Across Burlington. Outstanding Concerns: What conclusive independent evidence is there that transport of diluted bitumen at the project’s indicated.

Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.

June 6, 2012 Brian Reis, PE.  RPS Espey’s role in the planning process  Key state and federal requirements  Our unique water quantity and water quality.

Lower Rio Grande Valley Low Impact Development (LID) Implementation and Education by Brianna Saenz,MS, EIT AUGUSTO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M.S, CFM. Institute.

EAHCP Permit Oversight Shaun Payne HCP Coordinator.

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference

TMDL Implementation: Now What?

References/Acknowledgments

Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities’ Request for Modification of Interbasin Transfer Certificate HEARING OFFICERS REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS Toya Ogallo Division.

CHINO BASIN WATERMASTER

L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller

City of New Braunfels Watershed Management Programs

Edwards Aquifer HCP Annual Report

City Council Meeting December 20, 2016

Petticoat Creek Watershed Action Plan.

Spring Lake Dam - Rio Vista Dam

ND Downstream Watersheds Comprehensive Detention Planning

Water & Human Impact: Unit 4

North Shore Restoration Project

Water and Climate Change: Adaptation through Green Infrastructure

Economic Impact Potential of Recycling in Ohio

Strategies to Reduce P Loading and Sedimentation on Forestry Operations in Vermont First few slides will provide some background information on what we.

Water Advisory Board March 29, 2016.

Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments

PWO 13 Freeway Well Planning Project

SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN

Presentation transcript:

San Marcos & Texas State 2017 Nonroutine Adaptive Management San Marcos & Texas State Water Quality Protection Measures Presentation to the IC EAHCP Program Manager February 2017

Introduction Over the course of implementing the Conservation Measures associated with water quality protection in San Marcos, challenges, obstacles, and problems have been identified Analysis conducted through the EAHCP supported WQPP research & development as well as through the larger WPP process HCP provides a mechanism—the Adaptive Management Process—to address this issue

Water Quality Measures Affected City of San Marcos HCP § 5.3.6 Sediment Removal below Sewell Park HCP § 5.7.4 Minimizing Impacts of Contaminated Runoff HCP § 5.7.6 Impervious Cover/Water Quality Protection Texas State University HCP § 5.4.4 Sediment Removal in Spring Lake & Dam to City Park HCP § 5.4.6 Sessom Creek Sand Bar Removal

IC MEETING HERE City Park BMP Downtown BMP Hopkins BMP Veramendi BMP Hopkins BMP

Performance Comparisons Comparison Metric Veramendi BMP Downtown BMP Surface Area Capture 0.18 acres 32 acres Total P Removed/Year 8.5 lbs 24.2 lbs Comparison Metric Hopkins BMP City Park BMP Surface Area Capture 0.1 acre 11 acres Total P Removed/Year 6.4 lbs 16 lbs

Water Quality AMP #1 Timeline BACKGROUND Water Quality AMP #1 Timeline Mar 2 PM submits AMP proposal #1 (“Minimizing Impacts”) Mar 8 SC possibly recommends proposal & evaluation. SC provides input on designs. Mar 16 SH possibly recommends proposal. IC possibly approves proposal and USFWS letter.

Sessom Creek Watershed Reach-based restoration recommended

Sessom Creek Watershed

Water Quality AMP #2 Timeline BACKGROUND Water Quality AMP #2 Timeline March 8 SC will endorse the creation of a Work Group. July 31 PM submits AMP proposal #2 (“Sediment Removal/Water Quality Protection...”) Aug 7 SC possibly recommends proposal & evaluation. Sept 21 SH possibly recommends proposal. IC possibly approves proposal and USFWS letter.