NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training Script.
North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training Script.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Overview Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
Teacher PDP for the School Year
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
NC Educator Evaluation System Training for New Administrators Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
North Carolina Principals Council Fall 2012 Kimberly Simmons NCDPI Jennifer Preston NCDPI.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
NC Educator Effectiveness System NC Educator Effectiveness System Orientation and Training Southern School of Energy and Sustainability.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Fall 2011 Peer Observation Training. Agenda Process for Peer Observations What am I looking for during the Peer Observation and how do I rate it? How.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
Completing the Summary Rating Form and End-of-Year Summative Conferencing.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards These standards serve as the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NCEES Process: End-of-Year for Teacher Evaluations
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
Supporting Beginning Teachers
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process August 2, 2012
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation ***Complete within the first two weeks of teachers’ first day

Orientation Topics: NC Professional Teaching Standards ABSS REACH Goals NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) HomeBase (Truenorthlogic) – online tool used for NCEES Access to online resources: Evaluation Rubric for Teachers Schedule for Evaluating Teachers NC State Board Policy for Evaluating Teachers (TCP- C-004)

NC Professional Standards for Teachers Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership Standard 2: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students Standard 3: Teachers know the content they teach Standard 4: Teachers facilitate learning for their students Standard 5: Teachers reflect on their practice

Standard 6: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students. Included at the end of the year on the summary rating form Data from 2012-2013 will be recorded on teachers’ summary rating forms in Fall 2013 for teachers employed in 2012-2013. Assessment data includes both school and individual teacher assessment data***

What is Our Focus in ABSS? Rigorous instruction Engagement in 21st century learning opportunities Achievement in support of college/career readiness Community involvement to infuse school culture High quality teachers and administrators

Teacher Evaluation Process Component 2: Orientation Within two weeks of teacher’s first day, the principal will provide: A. The Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers; B. Teacher Evaluation Policy ID Number: TCP-C-004 ; and C. A schedule for completing evaluation process. Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric , the teacher shall rate their performance and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year. STEP 1: Training and Orientation STEP 2: Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the principal meets with the teacher to discuss: self- assessment, professional growth plan a written description of the lesson(s) to be observed. Goal: To prepare principal for the observation. Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process. STEP 4: Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) Component 8: PD Plans Individual Growth Plans-“Proficient” or better Monitored Growth Plans-At least 1 “Developing” Directed Growth Plans-“not Demonstrated” or “Developing” rating for 2 sequential yrs. Component 5: Observations A. Formal observation: 45 min. or entire class period B. Probationary Teachers: 3 formal by principal and 1 formal by peer C. Career Status Teachers: Evaluated annually. During the renewal year: 3 total- 1 must be formal Observations shall be noted using the Rubric. Time: 1 min The first distinction we need to make is between an observation and an evaluation. This language comes directly from page 17 of the Teacher Evaluation Process manual. In Step 3, during observations, the principal and peer (in the case of a probationary teacher) shall *note* the teacher’s performance in relationship to the applicable Standards on the Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers. The data gathered during this step will inform decisions that are made about a teacher’s performance in Step 4. Ratings are not actually given until Step 4, Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting. Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the Teacher Summary Rating Form- Prior to end of school Principal conducts summary evaluation conference with teacher to discuss components of the evaluation. At the conclusion: A. Give rating for each Element in Rubric B. Comment on “Not Demonstrated” C. overall rating of each Standard D. Provide teacher with opportunity to add comments to the Summary Rating Form E. Review completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with teacher and F. Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form. Component 6: Post-Observation Conference The principal shall conduct a post-observation conference no later than ten school days after each formal observation. Discuss and Document strengths and weaknesses on the Rubric.

Before Week 3 of School Year Component 2: Orientation Within two weeks of teacher’s first day, the principal will provide: A. The Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers; B. Teacher Evaluation Policy ID Number: TCP-C-004 C. A schedule for completing evaluation process. STEP 1: Training and Orientation Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process. Resources in Red

Before First Formal Observation Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric , the teacher shall rate their performance and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year. STEP 2: Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the principal meets with the teacher to discuss: self- assessment, professional growth plan a written description of the lesson(s) to be observed. Goal: To prepare principal for the observation.

Within the 1st nine weeks Component 5: Observations A. Formal observation: 45 min. or entire class period B. Probationary Teachers: 3 formal by principal and 1 formal by peer C. Career Status Teachers: Evaluated annually. During the renewal year: 3 total- 1 must be formal Observations shall be noted using the Rubric. STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) Component 6: Post-Observation Conference The principal shall conduct a post-observation conference no later than ten school days after each formal observation. Discuss and Document strengths and weaknesses on the Rubric

Before the End of the School Year Component 8: PD Plans Individual Growth Plans-“Proficient” or better Monitored Growth Plans-At least 1 “Developing” Directed Growth Plans-“not Demonstrated” or “Developing” rating for 2 sequential yrs. STEP 4: Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the Teacher Summary Rating Form- A. Give rating for each Element in Rubric B. Comment on “Not Demonstrated” C. overall rating of each Standard D. Provide teacher with opportunity to add comments to the Summary Rating Form E. Review completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with teacher and F. Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form.

Components of the NCEES (BTs & Probationary Teachers) Orientation Self-evaluation Pre-conference prior to observation #1 Four formal observations (3 administrator & 1 teacher) Summary rating form Professional development plan (developed in collaboration with mentor and principal/designee) – initial, mid-year, final Record of teacher activities form

Components of the NCEES (Career Teachers in Year of Renewal) Orientation Self-evaluation Pre-conference prior to observation #1 Three observations (1 full & 2 snapshot) Summary rating form Professional development plan (developed in collaboration with mentor and principal/designee) – initial, mid-year, final Record of teacher activities form

Components of the NCEES (Career Teachers Not in Year of Renewal) Orientation Self-evaluation Pre-conference prior to observation #1 Two snapshot observations Summary rating form Professional development plan (developed in collaboration with mentor and principal/designee) – initial, mid-year, final Record of teacher activities form

Performance Rating Scale Developing – Demonstrated adequate growth but did not demonstrate competence on standard(s) of performance Proficient – Demonstrated basic competence on standard(s) for performance Accomplished – Exceeded basic competence on standard(s) of performance most of the time

Performance Rating Scale (cont.) Distinguished – Consistently and significantly exceeded basic competence on standard(s) of performance Not Demonstrated – Did not demonstrate competence on, or adequate growth toward, achieving standard(s) of performance [NOTE: If the “Not Demonstrated” rating is used, the evaluator must comment about why it was used.] Not Looked For - No harm, no foul; wasn’t observed at this time.

Online NC Evaluation System Previous online system (McRel) closed 6/30/13 New online system (Home Base) will be accessed via PowerSchool UID provided to access PowerSchool

Initial Home Base Login View Once NCEES uploaded into Home Base, access will display on left side of screen. This will be access point via Power School. Once NCEES is uploaded into Home Base, access will display on left side of screen. This will be access point via Power School.

Teacher’s View in Home Base 3 tabs (Home, Evaluation Process, Help Guides)

Training/Orientation Signature Select Training/Orientation to sign electronically to verify orientation completed within 10-days of start date. Select Evaluation Process tab

NCEES Wiki – Teacher Resources http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NC+Teachers Features to review: Teacher Evaluation Process Manual Evaluation Comparison Chart NC Professional Teaching Standards NCEES State Board Policy (TCP-C-004)