Presented By: Mike Stout – PPL Glenn Neises - INPO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 CMBG Conference Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna, LLC June 17-20, 2007 Charleston, SC Engineering Change Impact Evaluation Process.
Advertisements

INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG
1. 2 ANSI/NIRMA Standard CM 1.0 The Rear View Mirror and What’s Ahead.
Cyber Security Plan Implementation Presentation to CMBG Glen Frix, Duke Energy June 20,
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
1 ANSI/NIRMA Standard CM 1.0 – 2007 Update Presented By: Rich Giska NIRMA ANSI Coordinator.
Configuration Management Publications at IAEA
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
1 CMBG History Presented By: John Parler CMBG Steering Committee.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
2006 CMBG Conference Sam Melton Supervisor, Configuration Management Brunswick Nuclear Plant Progress Energy June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA CM04 Facility.
ANSI/NIRMA Standard CM 1.0 Status Update
CM Training Best Practices John Parler VC Summer Station.
Modification Process Simplification Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
1 Configuration Management Publications at IAEA Presented By: Kent Freeland WorleyParsons.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG CMBG History Presented By: Mike Stout CMBG Steering.
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.
A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG Presented By: John Parler CMBG Steering Committee June 25, 2012 Chicago, Illinois.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
2006 CMBG Conference Workshop 2: Facilitator: Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
2006 CMBG Conference CMBG History Presented By: Rick Harris CMBG Steering Committee.
1 Configuration Management Performance Indicators Presented By: Lloyd Hancock LRH Consulting Services.
2010 CMBG Conference Temporary Design Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June , 2010 Charlotte, NC.
2007 CMBG Conference A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG Presented By: Rick Harris CMBG Steering Committee June 17-20, 2007 Charleston,
Warm-Up -8 – 7 = 4 x (-8) = -6 x (-6) = 48 / 8 = 9 – 12 = -66 / 6 =
2007 CMBG Conference Sam Melton Progress Energy June 19, 2007 Charleston, SC Configuration Management Principles And Practices for New Nuclear Plants.
Potential Topics for a Comment Letter for Steering Committee Review TWG agreed to engage in a discussion at the Denver meeting in order to identify “topic.
CMBG Conference 2013 Atlanta GA June 3, 2013 ANSI/NIRMA Standard CM Year History.
ANSI/NIRMA Standard CM 1.0 Status Update CMBG Conference 2016 West Palm Beach Gardens FL June 6, 2016.
Industry Standard CM Indicators Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear CM SME CMBG Steering Committee.
Introduction to Software Project Management Lecture1.
Instructor: Lloyd Hancock
CM-101 Configuration Management Fundamentals
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
NEI Configuration Control Benchmark – Palo Verde
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
Development Projects / Analysis Projects / On-site Service Projects
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group (www. cmbg
CMBG Performance Indicator Working Group
Promoting CM Breakout Session
Configuration Control and the Standard Nuclear Performance Model
Facilitator: Rick Harris and Mike Stout
Goal Reality Options Will
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry and the CMBG
Temporary Alterations in Support of Maintenance and Temporary Modifications Beth Kernes Krause - Cooper Station February 24, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
CMBG Steering Committee
Jim Powers - Director, Fleet Engineering
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee April 9, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
BREAKOUT 8: CM and The Next Generation of Plants
Workshop 1: Processing Facility Configuration Information
BREAKOUT 3: CM Health Reporting
Liaison report from 802 Architecture Group
I&C requirements and configuration management
Break Out 5: AP-929 Revision
Brief Queries in Probe Frames
THE FEDERAL LAW «ON STANDARDIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION»
Legislative Process: How a Bill Becomes a Law
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Commas in Dates WHERE DO THEY GO?!?.
Presentation transcript:

Presented By: Mike Stout – PPL Glenn Neises - INPO INPO AP-929, Rev.1 Presented By: Mike Stout – PPL Glenn Neises - INPO

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1 Draft developed by INPO at the request of the CMBG Steering Committee Draft dated May 2003 never issued Draft really deals with modification process and some design basis; not a configuration management process Steering Committee and INPO have agreed to work together to develop the revision that describes a configuration management process

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1 Approach Establish scope of the document 80/20 rule – several members of the group will be asked to work on the document and meet for 2 days to develop the best document in that time frame Make it consistent with ANSI/NIRMA CM 1.0-2000 Start with new process model (IDEF0)

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1 Standard Nuclear Performance Model (IAEA same) Evaluate problem or request Consider whether a design change is required If no, then consider whether a plant change is required If no, then consider whether a FCI change is required Or, do nothing more and document decision

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1 Missing Definitions are not complete Changes Configuration Change Design Authority Design Specifications Time effect on completed and installed design  Changes The activities in Rev. 1 are not incorrect, they are incomplete.