Strategic Hatchery Management Roadmap to Success Don Campton U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, OR.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.

Advertisements

Develop Local Okanogan Steelhead Brood Stock Proposal # Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.

Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and

Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.

Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.

Funding Monitoring in 2006 – the Programs role in a West Coast Partnership November 16, 2005.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.

Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Fishery Management Overview - Context Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.

CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

SRFB Round VIII & WRIA 8 Three Year Work Plan WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council March 15, 2007.

Conserving Americas Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia River Fisheries Program Office Future of Our Salmon A Vision of Restoration in the.

Summary of Recommendations: Peer Review of FY 13 Science Workplan Trinity River Restoration Program Preliminary Fiscal Year 2013 Science Workplan.

Wild Salmon Policy Update Yukon River Panel March 23, 2011.

11 Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Project #: Aja DeCoteau, CRITFC Watershed Department Manager.

Bonneville Environmental Foundation Model Watershed Program Presentation to the Pacific Northwest Monitoring Practitioner’s Workshop March 16, 2006.

Upper Willamette River Recovery Planning WITHIN OUR REACH New Partnerships for a Healthier Willamette December

Federal Concerns Regarding Hatchery Steelhead Spawning in the Wild NOAA Fisheries Salmon Recovery Division.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.

The Fundamentals of Conservation Design Image by Rex Johnson.

Coho Reintroduction in the Upper Columbia: Using Adaptive Management to Achieve Success Fisheries Resource Management Yakama Nation.

Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.

Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty Cedar River Sockeye Hatchery Proposed Adaptive Management Plan.

Critical Habitat Designation Pacific Salmon and Steelhead Southern Resident Killer Whales.

Recent Events in Water Law and Policy in the United States Portion of the Columbia Basin The Federal Columbia River Power System: Pacific Salmon and the.

Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.

Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.

The FWS-USGS Relationship Two Bureaus – One Mission Paul R. Schmidt Assistant Director Migratory Bird Program US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.

Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.

1 Legal Basis, Endangered Species Act and Hatchery Reform Heather Bartlett, Hatcheries Division Manager.

2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)

Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.

Salmon Recovery Status Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Linda Byers September 14, 2005.

A Decade of Working Together on Conservation & Sustainable Use of Canada’s Natural Assets CBS endorsed by FPT Ministers in April 1996 Federal, provincial,

Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.

IN PUGET SOUND & COASTAL WASHINGTON Hatchery Reform February 2003.

Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.

Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.

Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.

Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.

Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.

Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.

Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange Habitat Issues.

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.

1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.

Energy Beyond Hydropower Atlas Chapter 13 Figure 13.1 – Energy Consumption No PNW sources of natural gas or crude oil Refining crude oil – 4 north Puget.

Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

Implementing Hatchery Reform The Dawn of a New Beginning or more of the same old thing? Mike Delarm NOAA Fisheries.

Pacific NW and California Hatchery Reviews Similarities and Differences.

Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.

Hatchery Reform in the Pacific Northwest: Applying Science to Hatchery Management Applying Science to Hatchery Management, August 2008 Hatchery Scientific.

Settlement Agreement “The emphasis of this Agreement is …restoration and recovery of wild, indigenous salmon runs, including ESA-listed and unlisted.

Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting

BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.

EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.

Presentation transcript:

Strategic Hatchery Management Roadmap to Success Don Campton U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, OR

Scientific Review of Hatcheries: (stimulus): Proposed ESA listing of Chinook salmon in Puget Sound. 1999: U.S. Congress initiates Hatchery Scientific Review Group (HSRG) : HSRG review of Puget Sound and coastal Washington hatcheries (state, tribal, federal) : USFWS review of 15 Natl Fish Hatcheries and 9 Lower Snake River Comp. Plan hatcheries in ID, OR, WA : HSRG review (modeling assessment) of state, tribal, and federal hatcheries in the Columbia River basin : California HSRG review of state and federal hatcheries in California.

Scientific Principles for Hatchery Programs 1.Quantified Goals for populations** Harvest Conservation 2.Scientific defensibility Programmatic (Plan) Culture methods Release strategies 3.Adaptive Management M&E (benefits and risks) Scientific research Program adjustment

Scientific Principles for Hatchery Programs 1.Quantified Goals for populations** Harvest Conservation 2.Scientific defensibility Programmatic (Plan) Culture methods Release strategies 3.Adaptive Management M&E (benefits and risks) Scientific research Program adjustment

Scientific Principles for Hatchery Programs 1.Quantified Goals for populations** Harvest Conservation 2.Scientific defensibility Programmatic (Plan) Culture methods Release strategies 3.Adaptive Management M&E (benefits and risks) Scientific research Program adjustment

Strategic Hatchery Management: New Paradigm View hatcheries biologically as a type of habitat, manage fish as components of sustainable populations, and manage populations – both hatchery and wild - for maximum viability with quantified conservation and harvest goals for populations.

Implementation of Strategic Hatchery Management Main Points Programmatic changes and goal setting require agreement among comanagers. Most operational changes can be implemented with little or no increase in funds. Facility upgrades are often needed to reduce risks. M & E are essential for measuring success towards achievement of population goals (adaptive management).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Initiative Strategic Habitat Conservation (SHC)

The essence of SHC is setting explicit objectives for populations and then figuring out how to attain these objectives. (Strategic Wildlife Conservation)

Strategic Habitat Conservation *Identify conservation goals for populations* Outcome-based Monitoring Biological Planning Conservation Delivery Conservation Design

Strategic Hatchery Management *Identify conservation and harvest goals for populations* M & E Benefits and Risks Design/plan a hatchery program Implement hatchery program Develop or modify facilities and protocols

Conservation in Transition (Vision for the Future) The 21 st Century will demand: A shift from managing individual resources to sustaining species, populations, and systems; An emphasis on science linking work to landscapes, major eco-regions, and species ranges; Increased use of predictive models and measurable biological outcomes; Increased emphasis on biological accountability; Increased emphasis on transparency, public participation, and engagement.

Strategic Hatchery Management: Roadmap to Success Vision for the Future (Quantified Goals, Scientific Defensibility, Adaptive Management) Conclusions Focus on populations, not facilities. Establish conservation and harvest goals for populations, not goals for facilities. View hatcheries biologically as a type of habitat. Use the same scientific principles for managing all populations, regardless of where they spawn. Establish benchmarks for achieving population goals and measuring success. Adjust hatchery programs in response to M&E to increase the likelihood of achieving population goals (increasing benefits and reducing risks).