Improving the Lives of Callers: Call Outcomes and Unmet Needs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information and Referral: Call Center Proposal Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
Advertisements

Bankstown Family Relationship Centre (FRC) NIHAL DANIS Manager.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Education, Health and Care Plans Conversions. Background  We currently have over 800 pupils with Statements in West Berkshire  We also provide funding.
Th June 2012 Halfway Houses Primary School Secondary Admissions Briefing for Parents.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Adults Reading to Two Year Old Children: A Population-based Study Olivia Sappenfield Emory University School of Public Health.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
Staying Healthy Assessment Training (SHA) Information for non-clinical staff and providers on completing the Staying Healthy Assessment Provider Relations.
Final Presentation of Survey Results December 8, /8/20141 The.
Statistics Critical Thinking in Intro Stats Roger Woodard.
WHO The World Health Survey HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE
Intandem evaluation.
Introduction to the Domains
Introduce yourself and the school you are representing
At a glance Health access and utilization survey among non-camp refugees in Lebanon UNHCR November 2015.
The Association of Exposure to Adverse
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
University of Akron – Akron, OH For further information
intandem Evaluation Presentation contents Why do we do evaluation?
Angelika H. Claussen, PhD,
Effective Support for Children and Families in Essex – July 2017
What’s working and what’s not?
Understand factors to consider when selecting child care programs.
A Workshop for Richland One School District
Staying Healthy Assessment Training (SHA) Information for non-clinical staff and providers for completing the Staying Healthy Assessment Provider Relations.
Think about it… “What are some of the reasons parents enroll their children in child care?” 2.01-Child Care.
Release of PARCC Student Results
Case management for preventing child abuse and neglect: Working with multidiscipline group of professionals and local welfare commissioner Azusa Arimoto,
Determining Access.
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Open Comment Period on the Model State Plan: National Webinar An OSCOE National Webinar Tuesday, December 19th 2017 Dr. Jarle Crocker | CCAP, NCRT Director.
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
The Power of Statistics and Why We Need Them
Testing Efficiency Indicators
A Managers Guide to Parental Leave
The European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Services for your Child
Bell Ringer Open your student workbook and turn to page 65.
Analysis of Parental Vaccine Beliefs by Child’s School Type
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
TN Migrant Education Parent Training Program Pre-K Students
Denver Office of Children’s Affairs
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Overview of the Title I Program at Bayview Elementary
Do now – identify the sampling method
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Making it Real for Young Carers
FIRST RESPONSE Making a good referral.
What we will cover in today’s webinar
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Community Health Needs Assessment
Integrating Gender into Population and Housing Censuses
Work It Well Employee Orientation
“The Approach” One-on-one Problem Solving
Transitions The wellbeing of young people is at the heart of the transition process.
Results from County Extension Educator Survey January 2017
Why don’t you want to work with older adults?
Promoting early childhood health and literacy
Collecting the Data Tim Vizard, Office for National Statistics.
Who Are We? United 4 Children (Birth –18) Child Day Care Association
Berrien County FACT SHEET
Contact: Anuradha Bhatt, MPH
Chapter 5: The analysis of nonresponse
Kristal C. Kim BS, Shannon D. Simonovich
The Annual Report to Congress on IDEA
2015 Bradford County Needs Assessment
Admission to Secondary School in Kent September 2020
Presentation transcript:

Improving the Lives of 2-1-1 Callers: Call Outcomes and Unmet Needs Sonia Boyum Health Communication Research Laboratory Washington University in St. Louis 2015 AIRS I&R Training and Education Conference Dallas, TX

Call outcomes and unmet needs Call outcomes study What happens after referrals are given? 2-1-1 specialist survey What issues would improve the lives of callers most? Discussion The first part of the presentation will focus on a study of call outcomes for Missouri 2-1-1 callers. The second part of the presentation will focus on a survey of 2-1-1 I&R specialists, managers and call center directors. We asked them what issues they think would improve the lives of their callers most. And the third part will bring up some discussion points for how we can use what we learned to improve not only 2-1-1 service, but also lives of 2-1-1 callers

Call outcomes study 2-1-1 Missouri callers Participants in study on incorporating cancer control referrals into 2-1-1 service Follow up 1 month after original call Results for first service request and up to 3 referrals Part of a larger study we did on incorporating cancer control referrals into 2-1-1 service. For each service request, we measured several outcomes one month after the original call.

Remembered receiving referrals (N=1235) Sample description Original sample (N=1898) Reached at 1 month (N=1379) Remembered receiving referrals (N=1235) Mean age: 43.5 years 86% female 60% African American 27% < high school education Participants were those eligible and consented to participate in the cancer control study. A greater proportion were female than in the larger 2-1-1 caller population, but other demographic characteristics were similar. 1379/1898=73%, 1235/1898=65%

Reason for calling (first request) Utilities – Gas, electricity, water Home and family – holiday gifts, clothing, furniture, school supplies, aging etc.

Outcomes measured at one month For each of 3 referrals Did you attempt to contact this referral? Did you reach this referral? What happened as a result of this contact? Did you resolve the problem? As each question is answered, the sample size gets smaller.

Outcomes Did you attempt to contact this referral? 91% of callers attempted to contact at least one referral Why not contact? Not enough time - 37% Resolved problem another way -16% Lost the numbers - 10% Waiting to call – 8% Already knew the numbers - 6% Referrals not helpful - 6% Other - 37% What are the other reasons? Could indicate more than one reason.

Outcomes Did you reach this referral? 82% who called a referral reached someone

Outcomes What happened as a result of this contact? 36% received assistance Did not receive assistance: No funds available 34% Did not qualify for services 25% Other reasons 7% No reason given 34% 25% of whole sample received assistance

Outcomes What happened as a result of this contact? 36% of those received assistance Did not receive assistance: No funds available 34% Did not qualify for services 25% Other reasons 7% No reason given 34% 25% of whole sample received assistance

Problem resolution Did you resolve the problem? ~50% of participants resolved the problem by one month follow up Received assistance – 70% Did not receive assistance – 41% We asked, “Did you resolve the problem?”

Problem resolution There wasn’t a statistically significant difference between categories.

Unmet basic needs (next 30 days) Not enough money for unexpected expenses Not enough money for necessities Not enough living space Neighborhood safety No place to stay Not enough to eat Physically threatened Wanted to understand what factors were related to resolving problems, other than whether or not the caller received assistance. Unmet basic needs or life circumstances are separate but of course related to the caller’s reason for calling. At baseline (time of original call to 2-1-1) callers were asked how likely it was that they would have the following needs met in the next month.

Unmet Basic needs Participants had on average 2.4 unmet needs % of sample that had each basic need unmet Average number of unmet needs=2.4

Problem resolution Do unmet basic needs, receiving assistance predict whether or not the caller will resolve his or her problem? Logistic regression model controlled for number of service requests, age, sex, race, income, education, employment status, children in the home, study group from cancer control study We estimated a model predicting problem resolution and included the basic needs, age, sex, race, income, educational level, employment status, child in home. We attempted to include type of service request, but it was not significantly related, so we excluded it in the final model.

Model results More likely to resolve problem: Received assistance (3 times more likely) Less likely to resolve problem: Not enough money for necessities (2/3 as likely) Physical threat (1/3 as likely)

Conclusions 2-1-1 Missouri is highly effective in connecting callers to needed services But, need for services greatly exceeded availability Receiving assistance increases chances of resolving problems Limitations – there are more than 200 2-1-1 help lines, but this is only for 2-1-1 Missouri

Conclusions Due to unmet basic needs, some callers may be less likely to solve their problems How can we explain this? Outcomes studies can tell us more than just outcomes of referrals Understand the “why” of outcomes What can we do to improve outcomes? What else can understanding call outcomes tell us? Can we use outcomes studies to tell us more than just outcomes of referrals, but also to understand WHY and WHAT we can do to improve outcomes?

Part II: 2-1-1 Survey results

The survey Washington University staff in partnership with AIRS delivered the online survey Survey invitations sent from AIRS leadership Participants were from across the US and Canada Survey administered between Feb 25, 2013 and March 31, 2013.

Who took the survey?

Who took the survey?

Survey content Resource Availability and comfort Top 3 Need categories (A, B, C) A: Rank Top 3 Sub-categories Resource Availability and comfort B: Rank Top 3 Sub-categories C: Rank Top 3 Sub-categories Participants were asked to rank their top 3 priorities for improving the lives of their callers from a list of categories. For each selected need, they were then asked to rank the top 3 subcategories and then were asked two questions about availability. How would you rate the number of resources available for this subject? And acceptability: How comfortable would you feel bringing up this subject with callers.

What is most important for improving the lives of your callers? Preface: thinking broadly BEYOND things in your current database, or things that you know are already available… what additional resources and skills would REALLY make a difference ? Rank top 3 categories

Needs for those with children Parenting Child health and health care Child care Child development and learning Home and child safety Enriching children’s learning beyond school We will ask you to think about the lives of both adult callers AND callers who have children in the home. We then asked to rank the importance of subcategories within these main categories. As I have limited time, I’m going to on needs of callers who have children in the home today.

Callers with Children % of sample that ranked each category in top 3. Health care and child care are also important topics.

Within the categories you prioritized, what would help callers most? The next section will ask you to think further about what you said is important for improving lives.

Parenting Ranking within top 3 subcategories categories, of those who ranked parenting as a top priority.

How would you rate the number of resources available? The next section will ask you to think further about what you said is important for improving lives.

Parenting resources

If a caller did not ask about this issue, how comfortable would you feel bringing up this subject? The next section will ask you to think further about what you said is important for improving lives.

Parenting discomfort Ranking within top 3 categories, of those who ranked parenting as a top priority.

Child health and health care

Child health and health care

Child health and health care

Child care

Child care

Child care

Summary Parenting, child health and health care, child care were top priority issues Often high priority subcategories have inadequate resources 2-1-1 staff report low levels of discomfort with discussing sensitive topics with callers - how often are these high priority issues also reasons for calling 2-1-1?

Summary Potential proactive role in connecting 2-1-1 callers to resources beyond their primary reason for calling Highly ranked topics adequate resources Highly ranked topics inadequate resources Different approaches needed for addressing those highly ranked topics with adequate and inadequate resources. If adequate resources exist, it may just be a matter of linking those in need with appropriate resources. If inadequate resources exist, partnerships with community organizations will be needed.

Discussion Outcomes surveys 2-1-1 survey results Understanding impact of 2-1-1 referrals What other questions might be relevant to assessing the “why” of call outcomes? 2-1-1 survey results Possibility of proactively address needs of callers How well 211 is doing is more than number of calls or number of referrals – what happens afterwards?