Title I A Comparability Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Title I Comparability Paul Williams Principal Consultant ISBE September 2011.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
1 Title I Comparability Requirement Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
1 TITLE I COMPARABILITY – Determinations & Reporting Thomas Chin October 5, 2010.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Enrollment, Attendance, and Support Units New Superintendent Workshop.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
TITLE I FISCAL ISSUES. FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUNDING ISSUES Supplement not Supplant Maintenance of Effort Comparability Time and Effort 100% Certifications.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
1.  “Long Term Care & Treatment” programs are intended for the treatment of children with mental health and/or behavioral issues.  There are 47 programs.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Determining Comparability Georgia Compensatory Educational Leaders Conference Savannah, Georgia February 24-26, 2014.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
1 Determining Title IA School Allocations Title IA Online Training
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Budget and Legislative Update Alexis Schauss Director of School Business.
QEIA Monitoring Regular Application Schools April 29, 2010 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association QEIA Northern and.
PAPFC Annual Conference May 3-6, 2015 Presented By: Cindy Rhoads Division of Federal Programs Pennsylvania Department of Education.
TITLE I FISCAL ISSUES.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Intro of the presenters.
PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Duxbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2017 Operating Budget
Department of Exceptional Student Education
SBDM ALLOCATIONS Jody Maggard Perry County Schools.
Community Eligibility Provision
Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant (SNS) Under ESSA
General Rank Order Rules
Kansas Alliance for the Arts in Education
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision
Proposed Expenditure Budget
State of Education December 2011
School Business Division NC Department of Public Instruction
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Comparability Reporting through CDE’s Online Data System
Title I Part A Reporting
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Reporting and documenting the data for:
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
Understanding Title I Programs: An Overview for Parents
Roles and Responsibilities
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Taylor ISD Title I Parent Meeting
AYP and Report Card.
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Annual Title I Meeting
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Module 6: Parental Placement
Title I Part A Reporting
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability & Supplement, Not Supplant
Harmony School of Excellence-El Paso Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Title I A Comparability Report 2016-2017 School Year

Purpose A Local Education Agency (LEA) may receive funds under Title I, Part A and Title I, Part C if: State and local funds will be used in participating schools to provide services that, taken as a whole, are at least comparable to services that the LEA is providing in schools not receiving Title I, Part A or Title I, Part C funds.

Meeting the Requirement An LEA is considered to have met the statutory comparability requirements if it has implemented (1) an LEA wide salary schedule; (2) a policy to ensure equivalence among schools in teachers, administrators, and other staff; and (3) a policy to ensure equivalence among schools in the provision of curriculum materials and instructional supplies.

The Oregon Department of Education (ODE) has developed a standard for comparing student/ instructional staff ratios. School systems must complete an annual comparability status report that compares the average number of students per instructional staff in each Title I-A school with the average number of students per instructional staff in schools not participating in Title I-A.

Which Districts? This requirement applies to all public school districts that accept Title I-A funds with the exception of any LEA that does not have more than one building per grade span. In addition, if a district has a school with fewer than 100 students enrolled the school does not need to be included in the comparability calculations.

Which Schools? All district schools (including public charter schools) are part of the calculation. The comparison is made between like grade spans, i.e. elementary-to-elementary, middle-to- middle, high-to-high school. Student/teacher ratios and/or expenditures are calculated between Title I-A schools and non- Title I-A schools.

Which Students? All students enrolled in Title I-A and the non- Title I-A schools must be included in the Report. Kindergarten students are included and their count is determined by whether or not they attend full or half-day sessions.

Which staff? Calculate the Full Time Equivalent (FTE) numbers of certified and non-certified instructional staff who are paid with State and local funds that are regularly assigned to each school listed. Staff members whose full salaries are paid with federal dollars are not to be included in this report.

When comparing student/instructional staff ratios, the LEA must consistently include the same staff members in the ratios for both Title I- A schools and the comparison non-Title I-A schools. “Instructional staff” is defined as anyone who provides direct instruction to children or who assists or supervises those staff members who provide instruction.

Meeting the Requirement A Title I-A school is comparable if the school’s average student/teacher ratio does not exceed 110 percent of the average student/teacher ratio of schools not participating in Title I-A. For example, if the average ratio of students to instructional staff is 20 to 1 for an LEA’s non- Title I-A schools, the ratio at each Title I-A school can be no higher than 22 to 1.

When? All Title I-A funded schools in an LEA should meet the Title I-A “equivalence” staffing requirement by December 1 of each school year. Per statute, any Title I-A school not in compliance with this comparability requirement is subject to suspension and withholding of Title I-A funds.

Next steps: In order to meet the annual target date of December 1, an LEA should collect the comparability report information by October 1 of each school year. This will allow the LEA sufficient time for allocation, placement, and/or realignment of staffing in Title I-A schools prior to December 1st.

Questions?