Department of Health Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOUSING IS HEALTH CARE MARGARET FLANAGAN, LGSW DISABILITY AND CASE MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR Health Care for the Homeless (HCH)
Advertisements

HEARTH Webinar Part II This is Part II of the webinar providing an overview of the local implementation of the HEARTH Act. Thank you for watching, the.
THE COUNTY OF MADERA, CA THE FRONT DOOR A COST EFFECTIVE STRATEGY TO HELP FAMILIES EXIT OR AVOID HOMELESSNESS AND RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING CALWORKS HOUSING.
COMPASS: COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV LEAVING THE JAIL SETTING Emily Patry, BS The Miriam Hospital, Providence,
Hearing: The Road Home Testimony Before the CA Assembly Select Committee on Homelessness Peggy Bailey Senior Policy Advisor Corporation for Supportive.
March 6, 2013 Suzanne Wagner, Housing Innovations 1.
Austin/Travis County CoC PSH Bonus SEPTEMBER 22,2014.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Karen DeBlasio, HUD March 13, 2012 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
Central Receiving Center (CRC) System of Care Donna P. Wyche, MS, CAP Manager, Mental Health and Homeless Issues Division Orange County Family Services.
Permanent Supportive Housing: Impact on Hospital and Jail Usage for High Utilizers Virginia Supportive Housing Kristin Yavorsky Supportive Services Director.
MaineHousing ~ Homeless Initiatives Department NCSHA Conference ~ October 2014.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
Veterans Healthcare Administration Detroit VA Medical Center
HOUSING FIRST Broward County, FL Broward FL-601 Continuum of Care Board October 2014.
Federal and State Funding Shifts to Rapid Re-Housing: The Positive Impact on Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing Programs Audio Conference sponsored.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
LINKAGES IN STANISLAUS COUNTY VOICES OF FAMILIES AT TEAM MEETINGS.
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa Rapid Re-Housing Program (RHP) Presented by Jennielynn Holmes & Tanya Wulff.
1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008.
2014 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) Data Standards for ESG Presented by Melissa Mikel September
A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.
Hospital Discharge of Homeless Persons in Chicago
The Cottages At Hickory Crossing Dallas’ Premier Model of Permanent Supportive Housing A Status Report January 2011.
HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION RAPID RE- HOUSING PROGRAM Sept 2010.
GOVERNOR’S HOMELESS INITIATIVE 1C-7 Application Workshop 1.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
A cross-system collaborative approach to serving frequent users of emergency health services Frequent Users Systems Engagement (FUSE) Initiative of Washtenaw.
Monterey County Housing Support Program The Monterey County Department of Social Services partnered with the Housing Resource Center of Monterey County,
Housing & Services that Work for Homeless Older Adults DMH Housing Institute June 12, Century Park East Suite 4393 Los Angeles, CA
Research on Permanent Supportive Housing for Families NAEH National Conference on Ending Family Homelessness Jacquelyn Anderson Senior Program Manager,
2010 Florida HMIS Conference 1. Using HMIS to Inform Performance Measurement Outcomes Objective: –Enhance awareness and understanding on using HMIS to.
Community Perspective: Using Research and Technology to Identify Effective Solutions to Prevent and End Homelessness Michelle Hayes, The Cloudburst Group.
Supportive Housing: Community and Economic Impacts
September 18-19, 2006 – Denver, Colorado Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD’s Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures.
Beaver County Single Point of Accountability Transition of Care / Transition Planning Protocol.
Opportunities to Address Homelessness in California Sharon Rapport, CSH.
Homelessness: Policy Opportunities CSAC Institute Course: Homelessness Emerging Issues April 14, 2016.
C I T Y & C O U N T Y O F S A N F R A N C I S C O H U M A N S E R V I C E S A G E N C Y C I T Y & C O U N T Y O F S A N F R A N C I S C O H U M A N S E.
How to Implement Housing First
Cost of Rural Homelessness: Rural Permanent Supportive Housing Cost Analysis MHSA Small County TA Call September 15, 2010.
The Research Behind Successful Supportive Housing September 2016.
Crisis Response and Its Relation to Housing the Homeless Robert A. Dolci, M.A. Office of Supportive Housing Santa Clara CountyAugust 26,
Presentation to the Joint CSAC/LCC Homelessness Task Force
An Outpatient Service Continuum Approach to Addressing and Reducing Mental Health Crises CBHDA All Members Meeting August 11, 2016 Debbie Innes-Gomberg,
Factors Contributing to Eviction from HUD-VASH
Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services
National Conference on Ending Homelessness
Health in Housing The intersection between housing and health care Lane County Equity Coalition Amanda Saul, Enterprise Community Partners June 22, 2017.
Prevent Empower Stabilize
BRAP Bridging Rental Assistance Program
Virginia’s Road2Home Project
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Programs (HCHV)
Rapid Rehousing Programs
Health Care for the Homeless and Hepatitis National Hepatitis Coordinators' Conference January 27, 2003 Presented by: Amy M. Taylor, MD, MHS Deputy Chief,
Hospital Discharge of Homeless Persons in Chicago
Emily Patry, BS The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
Featuring: Kristen Rodgers, CommUnityCare Street Medicine Team
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
Bidirectional Association Between Homelessness and Incarceration Among Veterans Participating in HUD-VASH Dennis Culhane, PhD.
System Performance Measure Reports
MAY 20, 2017.
Behavioral Health Crisis Center “A back of the napkin view”
System Performance Measures (SPMs) and Longitudinal System Analysis (LSA) Data Quality 2018.
Getting Landlords to “Yes”: Structuring Incentives for PSH and RRH
Brilliant Corners Nonprofit supportive housing provider in California
RISE T4T Child Welfare Curriculum
Assertive community treatment webinar
Beaver County Single Point of Accountability
Behavioral Wellness Community Housing and Support Services
Presentation transcript:

Department of Health Services Los Angeles County Mitchell Katz, M.D. mitchell.katz@nychhc.org

goals Create 10,000 units of housing End chronic homelessness in LA County Reduce inappropriate use of expensive health care resources Improve health outcomes for vulnerable populations.

Clients housed Housing for Health provides housing and supportive services to homeless clients with physical and/or behavioral health conditions, high utilizers of county services, and other vulnerable populations. 

Hfh client process CLIENT IDENTIFICATION by DHS facilities, County departments, CES, and other partners REVIEW/EVALUATE/ROUTE REFERRALS by HFH Administrative/Clinical Team INTERIM HOUSING RECUPERATIVE CARE STABILIZATION HOUSING PERMANENT HOUSING

Supportive Housing Quarterly and Program-to-Date Outcomes Total # of clients who have attained housing since HFH began in November 2012 3968 Total # of clients who are currently housed 3572 Total # of clients housed July—September 2017 379

Health Conditions of clients Housed MOST COMMON CONDITIONS: Depression Seizure Disorder Hepatitis C Bipolar Disorder Asthma Cancer Substance Use Disorder Neuropathy Schizophrenia Schizoaffective Disorder Anemia HIV/AIDS Most HFH clients have MULTIPLE CHRONIC HEALTH CONDITIONS

Gender of Clients housed

Age of Clients housed

Race of Clients housed

Ethnicity of Clients housed

Health Insurance of clients housed

Income Sources of Housed Clients During the client intake and assessment process, the Intensive Case Management Services (ICMS) provider obtains information on the client’s income and health benefits. If the client appears to be eligible for a benefit they are not currently receiving, the ICMS provider will assist them to obtain any necessary documents and will complete and track applications for DPSS Services (CalFresh, Medi-Cal, GR, CalWORKs, and IHSS) and SSI. *Please note that clients can have more than once source of income.

Type of Housing Subsidy

Intensive case management Every client connected to services. Individualized service planning and linkages to health, mental health, and substance use disorder services. Help clients retain housing and reach health and wellbeing goals. Services provided by on-site staff or mobile teams.

Housing status and retention Homeless Status The average length of time that clients experienced homelessness was 3 years and 6 months and the median length of time was 2 years. The majority of HFH clients were chronically homeless (81%), which means they were homeless for more than one year or experienced four or more episodes of homelessness in the last three years. Housing retention rate 97% of clients retained housing (remained in unit or exited to other permanent housing) after 12 months. Exits from housing this quarter Fifty three (53) clients exited housing this quarter. Nine (9) passed away, twelve (12) voluntarily surrendered, five (5) moved into other independent living situations or moved in with family and friends, fifteen (15) left for an unknown reason, eight (8) were incarcerated, one (1) was evicted, three (3) moved to a higher level of care.

Flexible housing subsidy pool

HFH Evaluation background In 2017, RAND quantitatively analyzed and evaluated 890 Housing for Health clients*: 83% met HUD’s definition of chronically homeless 88% had a co-occurring medical and mental health or substance use condition More than 96% were stably housed for at least one year *Published report will be available in December 2017.

KEY Evaluation Findings The average public service utilization cost per participant the year before housing totaled $38,146. In the year after receiving housing and services, the total cost per participant totaled $15,358. Taking PSH costs into account, this represents a 20% net cost savings to the county.

KEY Evaluation Findings 76% reduction in inpatient medical services in the year after housing placement 67% reduction in emergency medical services in the year after housing placement 59% reduction in crisis stabilization services in the year after housing placement