Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Advertisements

Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Needs Analysis Instructor: Dr. Mavis Shang
The Education Adjustment Program Profile – Revised.
Exploring the use of QSR Software for understanding quality - from a research funder’s perspective Janice Fong Research Officer Strategies in Qualitative.
Mentor Update 1 Bridging the Journey from Preparation through Professional Practice.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
School Self – Evaluation
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Student Evaluation of Learning and Teaching (SELT) Survey.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
DRAFT January 2015 Prepared by: A ndrew C hang & C ompany, LLC CRDP Phase 2 Survey Results DISCLAIMER: This data is representative of the survey respondents.
Survey Design and Analysis
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
Engaging tenants in rent setting discussions
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Cheryl Ng Ling Hui Hee Jee Mei, Ph.D Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Attitudes Towards Science and Science Teaching – Understanding How Coursework and Practicum Affect Preservice Elementary Teachers Dr. Victoria Rosin.
Handwriting vs. Keyboard Skills
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
Assessment brief Post graduate route.
CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
National PTA School of Excellence
Learning and Teaching –
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
School Self-Evaluation 
Third Climate-ADAPT Webinar
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
ECH 514 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com
CMGT 445 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Longwood Central School District
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
GBV survey: progress EUROSTAT 20 March 2018.
Validation Team Exit Report
Validation Team Exit Report
Introduction to the training
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Victorian Curriculum: Unpacking Design and Technologies
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
US Department of Treasury Minority CDE NMTC Program Training and Technical Assistance Introduction and Intake Form Overview October 17-18, 2016 W W.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
National PTA School of Excellence
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Item 7 - Roadmap and mandate for the Task Force on UOE Education Expenditure Data Eurostat Education and Training Statistics Working Group - Luxembourg,
User Views on Quality Reporting
Human Resources Management: Module 3 Setting Performance Goals
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Completing your Program Review
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Understanding Standards An overview of course assessment
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Validation Team Exit Report
Presentation transcript:

Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview Jude Cosgrove and Gerry Shiel Educational Research Centre, Dublin October 26, 2017

Overview Aims Design Instruments Analysis and reporting Questions and answers

Importance of the DLF trial Hearing the views of participating schools and teachers will influence the national roll-out of the Digital Learning Framework Taking part is also likely to benefit teaching and learning experiences of school staff and students Thanks to all participating schools for their time, commitment and feedback

Aims To gather information on schools’ views on the Digital Learning Framework (DLF) document in order to highlight strengths and describe potential improvements To gather information from principals and teachers on the DLF trial in order to identify key strengths and challenges in its implementation To explore whether key strengths and challenges vary with the schools’ contexts

Aims To examine whether participation in the DLF trial has had any impact on teaching practices and perceived obstacles relating to teaching and learning in a digital context from the perspectives of principals and teachers To describe key activities, successes and challenges of schools in their work with the PDST during the trial, from the perspectives of both PDST staff and school staff To describe the learning from the DLF trial from the schools’ and PDST perspectives in order to compile information that could contribute to ongoing development and implementation of the DLF

Design The trial is conducted in 30 primary and 20 post-primary schools from Oct 2017 to May 2018 The Educational Research Centre (ERC) has been asked by DES to carry out an evaluation of the trial The ERC is responsible for developing and distributing the questionnaires, conducting the analyses, and drafting a report on the evaluation Schools have been selected so as to achieve broad representativeness by DEIS status, enrolment size, sex composition, language of instruction, and geographic spread All eight domains of the DLF document are represented in the selected schools’ proposals

Design Online questionnaires are administered to school principals, teachers involved in the trial, and PDST staff members supporting schools in the trial The questionnaires contain both closed (numeric) and open (text response) questions To provide a more in-depth understanding of the implementation of the DLF trial, six 90-minute focus groups are conducted with school staff (three primary and three post-primary) during November 2017 All data gathered for the purposes of the DLF trial are treated anonymously. Results that identify individual schools or individual persons will never be published

Instruments Principal questionnaires Teacher questionnaires Two 20-minute questionnaires in November 2017 and April/May 2018 Completed by principal Teacher questionnaires Completed by teachers involved in the trial School questionnaires for the PDST component Completed by principal or nominee after first PDST visit PDST questionnaires These mirror the school questionnaire for the PDST component Students will not be asked to complete a questionnaire However, focus groups with students are planned for April/May

Administration – school and teacher IDs Each school will be assigned a two-digit number by the ERC Each teacher will be assigned a four-digit number. The first two digits consist of the ERC-assigned school ID and the last two digits are sequential numbers, 01, 02, 03 etc. The ERC will provide a form to the principal of each school for principals to put the names of participating teachers beside each ID Teachers will then use this ID to complete the questionnaire. The ERC will never see the name of the teacher assigned to each ID These IDs are needed to process and quality assure the data

Administration – school and teacher IDs In the first week of November, school principals will receive: an invitation email with a link to the first school and PDST questionnaires an invitation email for teachers with a link to the first teacher questionnaire a blank teacher ID form (see next slide) Principals will be asked to forward the teachers’ email along with the completed form to teachers who are involved in the trial Teachers will need to use this form to identify their 4-digit ID number An email address has been set up to respond to queries relating to the evaluation: DLF@erc.ie The ERC website will shortly include a section for the DLF evaluation and the ERC/DLF web address will be included in the introduction email to principals

Administration – example teacher ID form

Analysis and reporting A report on the evaluation of the DLF trial will be submitted to the Department of Education and Skills in July 2018 An interim report will be submitted to the Department about mid-way through the trial Analyses will consist of descriptive statistics of numeric responses as well as thematic analysis of ‘written’ comments Focus group interviews will be drawn on to further illustrate emerging themes

Analysis and reporting The numeric and ‘written’ components will be triangulated (examined jointly) to produce a draft set of findings, recommendations and potential guidelines for national roll-out In drafting conclusions: findings that emerge consistently across all respondent groups will be emphasised findings that emerge as inconsistent across respondent groups will be flagged as indicative of difficulties with implementing the DLF.

Summary of timeline Week of November 6: Invitation email to principals with links to principal questionnaire, PDST questionnaire teacher email with link to teacher questionnaire to be forwarded to teachers blank teacher ID form to be completed and forwarded to teachers if possible, responses within one week Last two weeks in November: Focus group interviews April 2018: Follow-up questionnaire invitation emails sent out, interim report submitted to DES May 2018: Follow-up focus group interviews July 2018: Full report on evaluation submitted to DES

Thank you! Questions and Answers Comments and feedback