Workshop for Debate Teachers

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.

Advertisements

The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify the types of fallacious reasoning discussed in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 discusses fallacies of insufficient.

Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.

Understanding Logical Fallacies

Three Basic Fallacies All the fallacies we deal with are forms of three basic fallacies: - Irrelevant Reason - Hasty Conclusion - Problematic Premise.

Refutation China Debate Education Network:. Definition of Refutation Refutation involves one debater directly responding to an argument of an opposing.

Chapter 6 Lecture Notes Working on Relevance. Chapter 6 Understanding Relevance: The second condition for cogency for an argument is the (R) condition.

LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.

Chris Girouard, Mississippi House of Representatives Refutation 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University.

ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 4: APA, Grammar, & Punctuation.

Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.

Media Literacy Week 13.  According to Webster’s Dictionary, a fallacy is an error in reasoning or a flawed argument.  It’s an argument that does not.

What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.

Today’s Quote Use soft words and hard arguments English Proverb.

Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.

Visual Argumentation.

Copyright  2010 Pearson Education Canada / J A McLachlan Chapter Five Principles of Discussion and Debate.

Recognizing Fallacies.  Logic ◦ The study of the methods and principles of reasoning  Premises ◦ Facts or assumptions  Fallacy ◦ A deceptive argument-

Important Things to Know About Processing an Argumentative Essay There are three steps that every AP student should do every time he or she reads an argumentative.

Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.

Angle of Vision. Ethos The credibility and trustworthiness of the speaker/writer is shown. Ethos in a message can be increased through knowledge of the.

INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.

Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance

The Quality of Arguments: Fallacies Pei Lei:

Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

Day 13 Research Reading Professor Suffixes quiz Subjects, Verbs and Objects Fallacies introduction.

Fallacious reasoning is “false thinking.” People use fallacious reasoning when they draw incorrect or false conclusions. Fallacious reasoning may be either.

Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.

Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

Refutation. Purpose To challenge someone else’s argument. –This can involve a specific written argument (which is what we’re doing with the Postman text)

September 23 Objective: To know the significance of various molecules involved in metabolic processes and energy conversions that occur in living organisms.

China Debate Education Network: Structure of Argument.

LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”

Logical Fallacies: Begging the Question. By Dean Berry, Ed. D. This PowerPoint represents the first half of the lesson.

Go To Next Slide This tutorial will help you identify examples of the types of fallacies discussed in Chapter 5. Chapter 5 discusses fallacies of relevance.

A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.

Tutorial 4: Critical Reading. Inductive Arguments White swan Therefore, all swans are white. Discuss Activity G (only first paragraph).

A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency

Or how to win a debate by changing the topic.

a valid argument with true premises.

Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning

Chapter 10 notes Logic and Reasoning.

Developing your arguments

c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:

Logical Fallacies.

Logical fallicies By: Zeke Sloan.

Workshop for Debate Teachers

Philosophy : Thinkers, Theories and Questions Chapter 2

Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.

Are they Sound, Relevant, and Sufficient?

Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance

Analyzing Arguments What cultural contexts inform the argument---and what do they tell you about where the writer or creator is coming fro? What emotional,

Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?

Persuasive Speech Bellringer #

Logical Fallacy Study Guide

Using Principles of Logic to Strengthen Argument Writing

Argumentation Strategies

Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches

Choose the Most Appropriate Counterclaim for a Given Claim

FOR TEACHERS Monday – Focus on exposing students to vocabulary, getting definitions, and practicing Tuesday – Slip or Trip activity to begin practicing.

Day 21 Research Look at rubric Drafting Wednesday and Thursday

DO Now-2/28/18 Have your homework Ready for a check in!!

D11 – Bellringer Which of the following topics is most interesting to you? Let’s pick one, research, and debate! (20 minute research, 15 to debate!) Format:

(hint: not just a fight!)

Common Logical Fallacies

Refutation International Debate Education Association

PROOF SURROGATE Jessica.

SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Presentation transcript:

Workshop for Debate Teachers GUET—CDEN Workshop for Debate Teachers December 11 – 13, 2015 Identifying Fallacies of Argument

Johnson & Blair’s Model of Argument Cogency RSA Triangle: Criteria a good argument must meet. Relevance Acceptability Sufficiency

Johnson & Blair’s Model applied to the Structure of Argument Logically Adequate (More or Less) Acceptable ??? Relevant ??? Sufficient ??? Link Evidence Claim

Three Basic Fallacies: #1: Problematic Premise Unacceptable Evidence Unsuccessful Claim

Three Basic Fallacies: #2: Irrelevant Reaon No link between claim and evidence Evidence Unsuccessful Claim

Three Basic Fallacies: #3: Hasty Conclusion Evidence 1 Insufficient link between claim and evidence Evidence 1 Unsuccessful Claim Evidence 1