1. A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit

2. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be able to analyze the validity and soundness of arguments.

3. Monday, May 23 Avoiding the question: fallacies 1-7

4. Finding the main issue…asking the right questions…  DEFINITION: Fallacies of relevance have premises that do not “bear upon” the truth of the conclusions, and therefore they introduce an irrelevancy into the argument  In other words, the premises do not have much to do with the issue at hand. While these fallacies all bring some irrelevant issue to the forefront, they sometimes can seem convincing. Usually, this is because they play upon our emotions. If we allow the speaker to get us stirred up emotionally, we are likely to miss the fact that his argument fails to provide good evidence for what he is trying to prove. Sometimes, what is being asserted in one of these fallacies is outrageous and unfair. At other times, it may be perfectly true and reasonable, yet it is still not relevant. The best response in this case is to simply say, “true, perhaps, but irrelevant.  DEFINITION: Fallacies of relevance have premises that do not “bear upon” the truth of the conclusions, and therefore they introduce an irrelevancy into the argument  In other words, the premises do not have much to do with the issue at hand. While these fallacies all bring some irrelevant issue to the forefront, they sometimes can seem convincing. Usually, this is because they play upon our emotions. If we allow the speaker to get us stirred up emotionally, we are likely to miss the fact that his argument fails to provide good evidence for what he is trying to prove. Sometimes, what is being asserted in one of these fallacies is outrageous and unfair. At other times, it may be perfectly true and reasonable, yet it is still not relevant. The best response in this case is to simply say, “true, perhaps, but irrelevant.

5. The 4 Key Questions:  1. What is the issue at hand?  2. Relevance: is the argument relevant to the issue at hand?  3. Presumption: is the argument assuming something illegitimate?  4. Clarity: is the argument clear?  1. What is the issue at hand?  2. Relevance: is the argument relevant to the issue at hand?  3. Presumption: is the argument assuming something illegitimate?  4. Clarity: is the argument clear?

6. The four groups of Fallacies:  1. Avoiding the Question (Monday)  2. Making Assumptions (Tuesday)  3. Statistical Fallacies (Wednesday)  4. Propaganda (Thursday)  1. Avoiding the Question (Monday)  2. Making Assumptions (Tuesday)  3. Statistical Fallacies (Wednesday)  4. Propaganda (Thursday)

7. Pass out Fallacies Packet  Complete each set of fallacies in accordance with the day of the week.

8. Avoiding the Question Fallacies 1-7  Any time we introduce something irrelevant into an argument, we are avoiding the question. The fallacies in this section all avoid the question in some way.  Fallacies 1-7:  Red Herring  Ad Hominem Attack  Genetic Fallacy  Tu Quoque  Faulty Appeal to Authority  Appeal to People  Straw Man  Any time we introduce something irrelevant into an argument, we are avoiding the question. The fallacies in this section all avoid the question in some way.  Fallacies 1-7:  Red Herring  Ad Hominem Attack  Genetic Fallacy  Tu Quoque  Faulty Appeal to Authority  Appeal to People  Straw Man

9. Tuesday, May 24, 2016 Making Assumptions: Fallacies 8-13

10. Making Assumptions  An assumption is something taken for granted, or accepted as true without proof.  Often people who are debating have different assumptions. If they can understand the assumptions of their opponents, they will have more success changing their minds. 1.Circular Reasoning 2.Loaded Question 3.Part-to-Whole 4.Whole-to Part 5.Either-Or 6.Slippery Slope  An assumption is something taken for granted, or accepted as true without proof.  Often people who are debating have different assumptions. If they can understand the assumptions of their opponents, they will have more success changing their minds. 1.Circular Reasoning 2.Loaded Question 3.Part-to-Whole 4.Whole-to Part 5.Either-Or 6.Slippery Slope

11. Wednesday, May 25, 2016 Statistical Fallacies: 14-17

12. Statistical Fallacies 1.Hasty Generalizations 2.Weak Analogies 3.Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc 4.Proof by Lack of Evidence 1.Hasty Generalizations 2.Weak Analogies 3.Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc 4.Proof by Lack of Evidence

13. Thursday, May 26, 2016 Propaganda: Fallacies 18-25

14. Propaganda 1.Appeal to Fear 2.Appeal to Pity 3.Bandwagon 4.Exigency 5.Appeal to Tradition 6.Appeal to Flattery 7.Appeal to Novelty 8.Appeal to Spite 1.Appeal to Fear 2.Appeal to Pity 3.Bandwagon 4.Exigency 5.Appeal to Tradition 6.Appeal to Flattery 7.Appeal to Novelty 8.Appeal to Spite

15. Friday, May 27, 2016  6 Short Logic Videos: A small introduction to a big world of whims  http://twentytwowords.com/6-short-videos-to-teach-high-schoolers-logic/1/ http://twentytwowords.com/6-short-videos-to-teach-high-schoolers-logic/1/  6 Short Logic Videos: A small introduction to a big world of whims  http://twentytwowords.com/6-short-videos-to-teach-high-schoolers-logic/1/ http://twentytwowords.com/6-short-videos-to-teach-high-schoolers-logic/1/

16. Videos: For each video, write down the main ideas presented in your journals 1.Critical Thinking Part 1: A Valuable Argument 2.Critical Thinking Part 2: Broken Logic 3.Critical Thinking Part 3: The Man Who Was Made of Straw 4.Critical Thinking Part 4: Getting Personal 5.Critical Thinking Part 5: The Gambler’s Fallacy 6.Critical Thinking Part 6: A Precautionary Tale 1.Critical Thinking Part 1: A Valuable Argument 2.Critical Thinking Part 2: Broken Logic 3.Critical Thinking Part 3: The Man Who Was Made of Straw 4.Critical Thinking Part 4: Getting Personal 5.Critical Thinking Part 5: The Gambler’s Fallacy 6.Critical Thinking Part 6: A Precautionary Tale