Composite-based Verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Advertisements

Empirical Analysis and Statistical Modeling of Errors in Satellite Precipitation Sensors Yudong Tian, Ling Tang, Robert Adler, and Xin Lin University of.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
Exploring the Use of Object- Oriented Verification at the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Faye E. Barthold 1,2, Keith F. Brill 1, and David R. Novak.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
WHAT IS Z?  Radar reflectivity (dBZ)  Microwave energy reflects off objects (e.g. hydrometeors) and the return is reflectivity WHAT IS R?  Rainfall.
Assessment of Extreme Rainfall in the UK Marie Ekström
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorological Division / ESSL / NCAR WRF (near) Real-Time High-Resolution Forecast Using Bluesky Wei Wang May 19, 2005 CISL User.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
Verification Summit AMB verification: rapid feedback to guide model development decisions Patrick Hofmann, Bill Moninger, Steve Weygandt, Curtis Alexander,
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
“High resolution ensemble analysis: linking correlations and spread to physical processes ” S. Dey, R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini Mesoscale group.
“High resolution ensemble analysis: linking correlations and spread to physical processes ” S. Dey, R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini NWP 4: Probabilistic.
Development of an object- oriented verification technique for QPF Michael Baldwin 1 Matthew Wandishin 2, S. Lakshmivarahan 3 1 Cooperative Institute for.
IMPROVING VERY-SHORT-TERM STORM PREDICTIONS BY ASSIMILATING RADAR AND SATELLITE DATA INTO A MESOSCALE NWP MODEL Allen Zhao 1, John Cook 1, Qin Xu 2, and.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
The 2nd International Workshop on GPM Ground Validation TAIPEI, Taiwan, September 2005 GV for ECMWF's Data Assimilation Research Peter
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Accounting for Change: Local wind forecasts from the high-
2/10/03F.Marks1 Development of a Tropical Cyclone Rain Forecasting Tool Frank D. Marks NOAA/AOML, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, FL QPE Techniques.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
“High resolution ensemble analysis: linking correlations and spread to physical processes ” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini.
INFORMATION EXTRACTION AND VERIFICATION OF NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION FOR SEVERE WEATHER FORECASTING Israel Jirak, NOAA/Storm Prediction Center Chris.
Feature-based (object-based) Verification Nathan M. Hitchens National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Object-oriented verification of WRF forecasts from 2005 SPC/NSSL Spring Program Mike Baldwin Purdue University.
Typhoon Forecasting and QPF Technique Development in CWB Kuo-Chen Lu Central Weather Bureau.
An Investigation of the Mesoscale Predictability over the Northeast U.S.        Brian A. Colle, Matthew Jones, and Joseph Olson Institute for Terrestrial.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Applying Ensemble Probabilistic Forecasts in Risk-Based Decision Making Hui-Ling Chang 1, Shu-Chih Yang 2, Huiling Yuan 3,4, Pay-Liam Lin 2, and Yu-Chieng.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office Verification -status Clive Wilson, Presented by Mike Bush at EWGLAM Meeting October 8- 11, 2007.
Fly - Fight - Win 2 d Weather Group Mr. Evan Kuchera HQ AFWA 2 WXG/WEA Template: 28 Feb 06 Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited AFWA Ensemble.
WRF Verification Toolkit Workshop, Boulder, February 2007 Spatial verification of NWP model fields Beth Ebert BMRC, Australia.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
Mesoscale Assimilation of Rain-Affected Observations Clark Amerault National Research Council Postdoctoral Associate - Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey,
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
Roger A. Stocker 1 Jason E. Nachamkin 2 An overview of operational FNMOC mesoscale cloud forecast support 1 FNMOC: Fleet Numerical Meteorology & Oceanography.
Regional-scale OSSEs used to explore the impact of infrared brightness temperature observations Jason Otkin UW-Madison/CIMSS 06 February 2013.
COAMPS ® Ducting Validation Wallops-2000 William Thompson and Tracy Haack Naval Research Laboratory Marine Meteorology Division Monterey, CA COAMPS ® is.
A few examples of heavy precipitation forecast Ming Xue Director
Intensity-scale verification technique
Hydrometeorological Predication Center
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
Verifying Precipitation Events Using Composite Statistics
Spatial Verification Intercomparison Meeting, 20 February 2007, NCAR
Multi-scale validation of high resolution precipitation products
Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
Welcome to The Third Workshop of the
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
What temporal averaging period is appropriate for MM5 verification?
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
Naval Research Laboratory
Tropical Cyclone Structure-2008 (TCS-08) ONR/NRL Funded Projects
5 July 2018 Nikki Privé R.M. Errico
2 METOC Consulting, Monterey, CA 93943,
Predictability and Model Verification of the Water and Energy Cycles:
Composite Method Results Artificial Cases April 2008
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
SWFDP Key Issues for GIFS-TIGGE
COAMPS Coupled Ocean Atmosphere Prediction System Developed by FNMOC and NRL (1996) Operational - MEL/FNMOC Experimental - NRL-MRY 27 km Spatial.
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Western North Pacific Tropical Cyclone Formation and Structure Change
Orographic Influences on Rainfall Associated with Tropical Cyclone
The Flux Model of Orographic Rain
Presentation transcript:

Composite-based Verification Jason Nachamkin Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA References Nachamkin, J. E., 2004: Mesoscale verification using meteorological composites. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 941-955 Nachamkin, J. E., S. Chen, and J. S.Schmidt 2005: Evaluation of heavy precipitation forecasts using composite-based methods: A distributions-oriented approach. Mon. Wea. Rev.,133, 2163-2177.

Meteorological Fields Observations (gridded, point obs, swaths) SSMI winds RFC/ST4, BMRC rainfall Satellite rainfall estimates Storm reports? Forecast data Wind speed/direction Rainfall (resolved, parameterized, snow)

The Composite Method SSMI Winds Composite Forecast m s-1 27 km COAMPS®* wind speed (2001) Identify events of interest in the forecasts and observations Collect coordinated samples Compare forecast distribution to observed distribution *COAMPS® is a registered trademark of the Naval Research Laboratory

Quantifying the Results Given FC Event All Events ≥ 25 mm 24-hr FCST-OBS Bias (mm) mm Given OB Event 27 km COAMPS® rainfall (summer 2003) mm 810 x 810 km

Mistral Statistics Given an event is predicted All northwest winds ≥ 12.5 m s-1 Given an event is predicted Given an event is observed 27 km COAMPS® winds (2001) 810 x 810 km Dist of all known FCST events Dist of all known OBS events

Strengths Simplicity Flexibility Sampling and averages Minimal data manipulation Straightforward uncertainty calculations No dependence on field structure Flexibility Many data types accepted Multiple variables validated Database capable Probabilistic statistics applicable

Weaknesses Simplicity Dependent on event parameters Only general systematic biases No rotation/shape parameters Difficult to apply to single cases Dependent on event parameters Not good for very large, complex shapes (synoptic cloud fields) No funding

Case Study All Events ≥ 0.5 inches WRF2CAPS 13 May WRF4NCAR 13 May WRF4NCAR 1 June in×100 WRF4NCAR 1 June mm 400 x 400 km COAMPS® 27 km 400 x 400 km WRF2CAPS 13 May best overall WRF4NCAR 1 June missed forecasts High-res forecasts show improved ability to resolve more observed events at smaller scales