John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 18, 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Advertisements

New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS APPROACH CHANNEL EIS/EIR Major Robert Dion and Cameron Sessions Project Managers.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
October Prop K Strategic Plan & 5-Year Prioritization Programs Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee October 24, 2007.
An Update 1 August 4,  The proposed hydro generating station at Bala Falls remains front and centre as an issue of concern to residents and cottagers.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Atlin/Taku Land Use Planning Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #3 March 6, 2009.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Connecting Great Ideas and Great People Guiding Principles for Socially Responsible Associations & Nonprofits.
INSPIRE ePSIplus National Meeting 30 th October 2007 David Lee UK INSPIRE policy team.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Educational Master Plan Update Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) November 19, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
Draft Public Involvement Plan for: Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation August 19, 2010.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
PORT OF TACOMA. 1. Background 2. City Process Update 3. Review Guiding Principles 4. Next Steps General Business: City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
World Bank Safeguards Review and Update
Chapter 4 Assessment.
BLM Decision Making Process
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Minsi Lake Dam Public Meeting October 3, 2016 Paul Urbanik, P.E.
HRM 498 ASSIST Experience Tradition/hrm498assist.com
NFPA Guide for Structural Firefighting
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
HCS 455 EDU Inspiring Minds/hcs455edu.com
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
San Gabriel Mountains Community Collaborative
APS Strategic Plan Steering Committee
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING
September 2011 Public Open Houses
PRO Plan Update Chapter 1
HCS 455 TUTORS Lessons in Excellence -- hcs455tutors.com.
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Welcome to “a conversation” and Q&A with Council staff about COMMUNITY grants September 2018.
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Have your say!.
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Reliability Standards Development Plan
Great Lakes Wind Collaborative: Who We Are and What We Do
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Federal Parliamentary Pre-Budget Consultations in Canada:
Review of Parks Canada’s Planning Permit Process
I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor
Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks - towards implementation SCG, By Maria Brättemark, European Commission, DG Environment,
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Review of Parks Canada’s Planning Permit Process
San Francisco Bay Water Board
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Lower granite master plan revision
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Camarillo Springs Project Draft EIR Scoping Meeting
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision Karen Downey Operations Project Manager John Martin Reservoir 10/27/2016

Purpose of this Meeting -Describe Purpose of Master Plan -Describe the Revision Process -Explain Why Revision is Needed -Seek Your Participation & Input -Answer Questions individually at map stations Bullet 4: How is public input collected? Bullet 5: Once this presentation is finished, ACOE staff and CPW staff will be available to answer questions at informational booths setup around the room.

Purpose of Master Plans The Corps defines a Master Plan as… “The strategic land use management document that guides the comprehensive management and development of all project recreational, natural and cultural resources throughout the life of the water resource development project.” Source: Chapter 3 of EP 1130-2-550 available at www.usace.army.mil/library/publications This definition is included in a national Corps guidance document, EP 1130-2-550. This document is available online at the site noted on the slide. The key terms are land use management, recreational, natural and cultural resources. Cultural resources is a collective term used to describe archeological sites, historical sites and artifacts. The term “Project” is used interchangeably with the term “Lake” or “Lake Project”

What Master Plan’s DO Guides the comprehensive management and development of all project recreational, natural, and cultural resources throughout the life of the water resource project. Informs the efficient and cost-effective management, development, and use of project lands. Vital tool for the responsible stewardship and sustainability of project resources for the benefit of present and future generations.

Key Points Regarding Master Plans Main focus is stewardship of natural and cultural resources and operation of quality outdoor recreation areas Proposed effective life of a Master Plan is 25 years Recreational use of the water surface is addressed Public participation is key throughout the revision process Talking points: Place emphasis on the land and recreation management focus of the Master Plan. May want to state that land and recreation management programs must be implemented in ways that do not conflict with primary project missions of flood risk management and water conservation.

Additional Key Points Key sections of the Master Plan Revision include resource management objectives revised land use classifications management plan for each land classification Potential outcomes could be designation of lands for utility corridors, environmentally sensitive areas… Protection of environmentally sensitive areas is given priority Stakeholder and Public Input is Important Examples of Resource Management Objectives will be provided in later slides Land Use Classifications will be defined in later slides

A Master Plan is Not Is not intended to address the specifics of regional water quality specific management and operations issues water level management *These areas are covered in other plans and policies for the operation and management of the lake, lands, and resources.

Why Revise the John Martin Lake Master Plan? Current Master Plan is dated November 1974 and has exceeded its useful life. The way the lake is managed today is different from the way it was managed in 1974. Recreational trends and Federal Policy have changed in the past 40 years requiring a fresh look at land use designations. The Master Plan must be revised to address current and future growth and changes in human and ecological factors in the region balanced with economic realities.

Facts about John Martin Reservoir Construction of the John Martin Dam and Reservoir began in August 1940, but work was suspended in the spring of 1943 due to World War II. Construction resumed in the spring of 1946 and the project was completed in October 1948. The dam was built for the purposes of flood control and irrigation. The reservoir has a capacity of 603,500 acre-feet with 261,000 acre-feet for flood storage. The dam is a concrete gravity structure with a spillway of 1,174 feet and 16 tainter gates, each weighing 73 tons.

Master Plan Guiding Policy (Chapter 3 of EP 1130-2-550) Provide the best management practices to respond to regional needs Protect and manage project natural and cultural resources Provide public outdoor recreation opportunities that support project purposes and public demands Recognize the particular qualities, characteristics, and potentials of the project Provide consistency and compatibility with national objectives and other state and regional goals and programs Provide the best management practices to respond to regional needs, resource capabilities and suitability and expressed public interests consistent with authorized project purposes Protect and manage project natural and cultural resources through sustainable environmental stewardship programs Provide public outdoor recreation opportunities that support project purposes and public demands created by the project itself while sustaining project natural resources Recognize the particular qualities, characteristics, and potentials of the project Provide consistency and compatibility with national objectives and other state and regional goals and programs

Scope of Master Plan The scope for the John Martin MP revision is to: review the entire current 1974 Master Plan collect data on issues affecting current and future land uses focus on updating land classifications to better serve current and future needs and recognize regional trends and priorities develop broad resource objectives for recreation, natural resources, cultural resources, public safety, and other topics *The scope does not include specific management issues

Master Plan Next Steps Typical lake master plan update will take 18 to 24 months to finalize. John Martin Reservoir Master Plan update is in the early stage of development First 30 day public comment is 28 October thru 27 November Draft MP document: 9-15 months (July 2017) Draft MP / EA public review in October of 2017, followed by another 30 day Public/Agency comment period Final document: 4 - 6 months (December 2017)

How Can I Participate? Attend Meetings Visit our website at: http://www.spa.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil- Works/Recreation/John-Martin-Reservoir/Master-Plan/ Send us an e-mail: (JohnMartin@usace.army.mil) Visit with Corps personnel Tell your friends Fill out a comment card now or take it home and send later (30 days) Tell folks we must have written comments for ideas to be considered Encourage comments on: - Land Classification - Management Objectives

The End Please feel free to visit with staff members, view the maps, ask questions and help us produce an excellent Master Plan